VERDICT WATCH MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #35 Retrial

If anyone is interested, you can follow @ LawCrimeVerdict on x/twitter to be alerted when the verdict is in. I don’t usually use twitter but since it’s lunch break I’m going to follow it and set it so that I’ll get an alert on my phone when it’s time. Someone mentioned this during T1 and it helped me out then so passing the idea along
It is the only X account I get notifications from lol I always smile when I get a verdict notification... sometimes even if I haven't followed trials, I will go watch ;)
 
If anyone is interested, you can follow @ LawCrimeVerdict on x/twitter to be alerted when the verdict is in. I don’t usually use twitter but since it’s lunch break I’m going to follow it and set it so that I’ll get an alert on my phone when it’s time. Someone mentioned this during T1 and it helped me out then so passing the idea along
So yeah , I am not watching the jury instructions either .. I will read them.
Also I need to check that link about the day the sate rested the case.
 
What are the guesses - Hos long will the jury deliberate?
I think... I would like more info on who is going to deliberate first. Some reporters give some info on them, but never know which way they are actually leaning.

I am unsure if we will get a guilty/not guilty though... hate to think it will be hung jury again.
 
Hank just suggested something I don’t think ever ever heard form the CW before - that Karen potentially stopped at Fairview to look at John’s body BEFORE going to Jen McCabe’s house?!

I believe that was stated in this filing before the first trial, it's 49 pages long so I'm not going to look for it lol but I remember reading that in a filing early on.

 
hmmm I know it was implied in the first trial... I am not sure if it came out like that in any testimony in this trial.

I do believe they "said" they looked for video.. isn't that part of "missing" video (maybe it didn't show what they were hoping.. that she went there before Jen's? Conveniently went missing?)
They tried to use cell tower data in the first trial to imply this but it backfired since it showed she connected to the same tower the 2 times we know she was at 34 Fairview. The time they tried to insinuate she went back by herself, she was connected to a different tower.
 
By the time they get sent to deliberate, they will only have a few hours, then break for the weekend. Not sure if it’s better that way or not
I like that they'll get a chance to at least get to release some of their questions and comments and likely stress to each other before the weekend. I wonder if they will do a vote before the weekend just to see where the numbers stand. It's such a heavy burden on these jurors to decide this case.
MOO
 
I hate that Auntie Bev gets to choose the foreperson; who came up with that idea?
Some state legislator or other. "This is how we do it in MA Mr Jackson"
The problem I have with it, is she selects the foreperson before the other 17 go into the barrell. So she chooses personally. I do not agree with this court statute because it allows a judge to influence the make up of the deliberating jury after voir dire and after a case has concluded.
 
I like that they'll get a chance to at least get to release some of their questions and comments and likely stress to each other before the weekend. I wonder if they will do a vote before the weekend just to see where the numbers stand. It's such a heavy burden on these jurors to decide this case.
MOO

No matter what their decision ends up being... there will be people that don't agree with them. I hope the court prepares them for that.

It will not be easy. And they probably have no idea what is coming.

JMO
 
I like that they'll get a chance to at least get to release some of their questions and comments and likely stress to each other before the weekend. I wonder if they will do a vote before the weekend just to see where the numbers stand. It's such a heavy burden on these jurors to decide this case.
MOO
I think it should be relatively easy for them unless they somehow forget it is the state's burden and what reasonable doubt is.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
358
Total visitors
429

Forum statistics

Threads
625,549
Messages
18,505,977
Members
240,813
Latest member
AmyLangshaw
Back
Top