NOT GUILTY MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #38 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #241
AJ blasted both the judge and Brennan in his chat with Howie Carr. I really hope he and the other lawyers speak publicly and in more detail.
 
  • #242
I can sum up most of that long, gruelling court case in two words:

Objection!
Sustained
!

Over and over and over again.

For goodness sake, even the jury sent a note to the judge asking that the witnesses just be allowed to answer the questions.
 
  • #243
what makes this acquittal so sweet is that the jury spoke and despite a judge that did all possible to insure a CW win it did not happen. The defense won IN SPITE of her rulings and the way she conducted the courtroom.
 
  • #244
I can sum up most of that long, gruelling court case in two words:

Objection!
Sustained
!

Over and over and over again.

For goodness sake, even the jury sent a note to the judge asking that the witnesses just be allowed to answer the questions.
a high % of time these last weeks was spent waiting and sidebars.
 
  • #245
a high % of time these last weeks was spent waiting and sidebars.
So much of that. We viewers had the benifit of skipping through on YouTube. The jury had to wait it out. An enormous waste of time and an enormous waste of taxpayers money.
 
  • #246
  • #247
Michael Morrissey has spoken:

" The jury has spoken".

Yep. That's it folks..... ( Insert WB cartoons music here)


Pathetic as always! They are going to vote this buffoon out next election and I can't wait!
 
  • #248
Michael Morrissey has spoken:

" The jury has spoken".

Yep. That's it folks..... ( Insert WB cartoons music here)

This is pathetic! I am so tired of these people blaming everyone else for their failures. Seriously? These citizens, taxpayers, spent weeks on that jury, putting their own lives on hold, to hear your sorry excuse for a prosecution. And now because you lost so badly, you're not even going to acknowledge them or thank them for their service?
 
  • #249
  • #250
  • #251
I can sum up most of that long, gruelling court case in two words:

Objection!
Sustained
!

Over and over and over again.

For goodness sake, even the jury sent a note to the judge asking that the witnesses just be allowed to answer the questions.
You forgot

Side bahhhhhh
 
  • #252
How about you start with Buhkenik and Tully, Colonel? Both still collecting fat salaries.

Watching Michael Proctor last night, two things struck me. First, he was clearly planning on making himself look like the victim here if he'd been called to the stand by the defense. Probably to the point of weeping about his "dumb remarks" whilst insisting he did a bang-up job otherwise. Good call not calling him.

Secondly, he's incredibly dumb. Like unbelievably stupid. Just the kind of idiot who would routinely plant evidence to make his work easier because he's so clueless as to how to actually proceed with a thorough, impartial investigation. Quality work takes work. And this work takes a least an average amount of brain cells. Something Proctor doesn't appear to have.
I’ll bet he’s used to doing the bare minimum at work - phoning it in, so to speak. I wonder if he even recalls HOW to be a a professional LEO. Unfortunately, that attitude is ‘catchy’. If Proctor is only phoning it in, yet collecting a full paycheck, others may follow. He’s been taking shortcuts and phoning it in for years.

Here’s an example of his ‘professionalism’:
…with an Albert brother, no less 🙄

2 Mass. officers connected to Karen Read investigation disciplined
 
  • #253
  • #254
Yes, I was thinking she was in the parking lot getting ready to leave when the call came in, I don't recall her (or anyone) saying she was on patrol (though that could be the case), but since she was in the control room when on overtime, I figured that was where she had been on her shift.
What exactly did Dever originally say (& to whom) and when and how did she backtrack her original statement? TIA

Her attitude was remarkable!
 
  • #255
What exactly did Dever originally say (& to whom) and when and how did she backtrack her original statement? TIA

Her attitude was remarkable!
She said she saw Cheif Berkowicz and Brian Higgins in the sallyport the night of January 29th while Karen's Lexus was there and they spent a weird amount of time in there. Then later she said she was shown the car got there after her shift ended so she couldn't have possibly seen what she said she saw or thought she saw. It was strange.
 
  • #256
The phone and car data proved it, as well as the actions and words of KR. ALL just my opinion.
The physics and math proved he was not hit by a car, nor did her car hit him. So there’s that. IMO.
 
  • #257
This is one intelligent juror. He's standing up against interviewer suggesting to him that the jury needed to believe in a conspiracy in order to acquit. He's educating the interviewer about how they only considered the facts and evidence they were presented with in court. Impressive. Jmo
I just got here and scanned a few pages and I don't think LYK was posted.
I'm going to listen now.


 
  • #258
She said she saw Cheif Berkowicz and Brian Higgins in the sallyport the night of January 29th while Karen's Lexus was there and they spent a weird amount of time in there. Then later she said she was shown the car got there after her shift ended so she couldn't have possibly seen what she said she saw or thought she saw. It was strange.

She also originally reported this to The FBI, then reported back in to them....after claims of her " False Memory".

For me personally, this strange and belligerent testimony of Ms Deever was the cherry on the top of CORRUPTION claims/ reasonable doubt, if there ever was. The woman was about as believable as dirt...
 
  • #259
She said she saw Cheif Berkowicz and Brian Higgins in the sallyport the night of January 29th while Karen's Lexus was there and they spent a weird amount of time in there. Then later she said she was shown the car got there after her shift ended so she couldn't have possibly seen what she said she saw or thought she saw. It was strange.
She lied in this trial and said it was a false memory. There is a snip of a vid that was unearthed once Proctor was fired of , I def believe it was her, walking into the sallyport, standing for a second towards them, then an ABRUPT turn around and out. It was if they said, you saw nothing, get out and keep your mouth shut'.. FOR REAL. imo
 
  • #260
She also originally reported this to The FBI, then reported back in to them....after claims of her " False Memory".

For me personally, this strange and belligerent testimony of Ms Deever was the cherry on the top of CORRUPTION claims/ reasonable doubt, if there ever was. The woman was about as believable as dirt...
Some commenters said calling Dever "backfired" for the defense. Oh, no, quite the opposite. It gave the jury the opportunity to see a real life corrupt (former) Canton cop blatantly lie and behave badly on the stand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
2,870
Total visitors
2,980

Forum statistics

Threads
632,113
Messages
18,622,225
Members
243,023
Latest member
roxxbott579
Back
Top