I agree with that, but didn’t the canton police officer who removed the taillight admit he broke it when he testified during the early days of the trial?There is no way I would describe the tail light we are seeing as "cracked" or "missing a piece" - most of the tail light is missing!
if that is true, that makes it really odd that Proctor would testify it looks just as he saw it on the car the morning after the murder.I agree with that, but didn’t the canton police officer who removed the taillight admit he broke it when he testified during the early days of the trial?
MOO
When I drop a glass and it breaks off part of the side of the glass, it looks like one hole in the glass, not multiple holes. When I sweep up my mess, there are usually multiple shards of glass in the dustpan.That's quite a stretch.
Are taillights actually made of glass?When I drop a glass and it breaks off part of the side of the glass, it looks like one hole in the glass, not multiple holes. When I sweep up my mess, there are usually multiple shards of glass in the dustpan.
It does. Not the first time the CW witnesses have contradicted their selves.Kinda the record keeper? Good lord.
if that is true, that makes it really odd that Proctor would testify it looks just as he saw it on the car the morning after the murder.
ExactlyWhen I drop a glass and it breaks off part of the side of the glass, it looks like one hole in the glass, not multiple holes. When I sweep up my mess, there are usually multiple shards of glass in the dustpan.
When I drop a glass and it breaks off part of the side of the glass, it looks like one hole in the glass, not multiple holes. When I sweep up my mess, there are usually multiple shards of glass in the dustpan.
A stretch? How soThat's quite a stretch.