Maybe the bar didn't release their own video to YOU. I don't know that they did not release it to Law Enforcement. Do you?
The market, according to the links I provided, released their video to the Marr family.
The bar has no obligation to the public.
MOO
The bar has no obligation to the public.
Resectfully, I disagree. If nothing "happened" that had a role in what has transpired, why not release their video. Clear up what was going on.
How would management "know" he was not denied reentry. I am assuming a bouncer does not report to management when they bounce a patron on a Friday night.
In addition imo , I would tend to think management would be aware of potential problems down the road. I would think more likely than not , that if they quesioned the bouncers , the bouncers tendancy would be , in light of the fact that a patron had vanished from their establishement, to deny.
I wound also bet that bouncers in that area would be totally aware of the lawsuit in thier neighborhood recently. Not only would they not want to get terminated, they sure as heck dont want to have to go to court, depostions and all the stuff. (See below)
I would also hope in hindsight, that if that is what occured, without his jacket, and he is found frozen to death somewhere it would be pretty clear that the bar is going to have , at least, some cival liability.
Making a specfic mention of that (not denied reentry), IMO indicates an awareness that they could have some liability.
Property owners owe the highest degree of care to invitees to make sure they are safe from dangers on their property. - See more at: http://realestate.findlaw.com/ownin...y-to-prevent-injury.html#sthash.RMcGjJKh.dpuf
Restaurant owners in the Finanial area, I would assume had heightened awareness of the potential of being sued.
Receently in that very area the exact same thing happened and they were sued.
In February 2014, Eric Munsell was ousted from the Market bar and lounge after a bouncer saw him stumbling and bumping into other customers. Although it was below freezing outside, Munsell was not given a chance to retrieve his coat or tell his friends he was leaving, the lawsuit says.
The bouncer did not tell Munsell’s friends he had been kicked out or call him a cab, it alleges.
hope the suit encourages bars to take more care ejecting intoxicated customers.
There is really no logical reason tho, if not bounced, not go get your coat, when it is minus 9 out with 16 mile an hour winds- knowing full well you have to walk when the bar closes to somewhere.
If we go with cog hypothsis the text telling cousin they wont let me in would make sense.
But if he did not leave to "start over" what would the intent be to text cousin stating that they refused him entry?
His "lets leave" does sound like an intent to rejoin them. It also makes sense that he did feel the need to advise them of that so they dont worry when he is gone for a time peroid longer than a cigg.
In thinking about the start over (grandm a comes into the mix ) IMO
It did also sound as if stuff was looking up. He was in school full time (IMO a looking forward to something actvity) working full time.
That also IMO complicates the suicide notion. A hallmark of suicde is the notion of hoplessness, nothing in the future, while going to college indacates IMo the opposite
It is very confusing sitution with so many confusing variables
At this point its like MAL 370
http://www.suicide.org/hopelessness-a-dangerous-warning-sign.html
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...or-sues-bar/SaxUUj931fBrMQDKOpVXaN/story.html
