The reports came from Kate McCann's mother, I think. She said her daughter worked part-time as a doctor, and when she was home with the children she needed help on a regular basis because they (Madeleine and the twins) were too much for her alone.
I know many parents in the same situation who did it all by themselves. Once upon a time my best friend's oldest three children were 4 (barely), 2 and 1, and the only time she needed help was when she wanted to go shopping. Since several of my kids were the same age, I was only too happy to accompany her and we'd help each other keep an eye on the hatchlings.
I was a foster parent for many years and remember caring for 2-3 foster children at a time plus my own. My youngest two were 14 months apart, and often I'd have a smaller one in tow. Did it supremely well? Maybe not. But I did it on my own.
What you see isn't always what you get it to be....
If your uncle dies - you may be sad for days, crying etc.
But, at the funeral - you briefly smile at your aged aunt, to comfort her ... the press take that picture , crop you aunt out of it - and you will have been smiling away at your own uncle's funeral for all the world to see.
Happy as a lark as your loved uncle is lowered below.
It's easy to fake a picture - anyone who displeased one newspaper that I knew of was put on the end of the line which was being pictured and cropped off later. Thus - they were not even at the event.
A photograph doesn't give the the whole picture. Neither does a film. In the USA you may not have seen the story about the Queen apparently storming out ofa photo session with an American photographer - Annie Liebowitz(??). Untrue - as the chronological order of the film was reversed and the pictures shown showed her entering the room, rather than leaving it. Apologies all round.
So if newspaper articles are sometimes hype, photographs can be cropped and films reversed - it's wise to be cautious, when thinking you know all about personalities that you see in the media. In fact, some are exactly like they are portrayed on screen, others are quite unlike their media selves. Your gut reaction can be manipulated.
Even if you - Calikid - were almost exemplary with your young children, I bet a good photographer could come up with a shot that would show you distracted or cross by being pictured at the wrong moment from the wrong angle. You know that the paparrazzi will shout abuse at personalities just to get that sellable reaction on film.
Personally, I really don't know what to think about the McCann's leaving their children. I've never left mine. But I'm not willing to make the parents into the people I hate simply because I know that I don't know all the facts.
If there was an employed nanny, I find it hard to belive that the press haven't yet tracked her down, as, if she exists, her story would be worth reading.
As for those fun-loving globe-trotting parents, what's the alternative for the couple? Pack up, go home and forget all about their daughter?
I can write the story for you now.....
The McCanns, parents of the lost Madelaine, today refused to meet Mr Important saying it was more necessary for them to return from Portugal to their luxury *£450,000 home in Leicester.
Despite the fact that their four-year-old daughter has been missing since May 3, the pair have turned their backs on the investigation, dismissing the idea that their daughter could be alive, in their eagerness to get on with their lives. etc etc
(* No I don't know how much their home is worth but you get the picture).
Just refuse to be manipulated by what you read and think you see and keep an open mind.