http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Bal.png
the above photo shows that whilst the mccann patio doors were easily accessible on a path that was quite open, the other two ground floor flats had patio doors that were more secluded, and as the patio doors could not be locked or unlocked from the outside locking them meant having to use the other door. The upstairs flat ha dpatio doors that led onto a private balcony. However, why is it odd that a child was abducted from the one flat that was left unlocked. If an abductor was prepared to take any child why would they spend ages trying to pick a lock, when the nearest flat was unlocked. If two cars were next to each other which would be more likely to be stolen, the unlocked on or the locked one? So ti is hardly an odd coincidence that an intruder chose to go into an unlocked flat rather than a locked one.
And no-where doe sit say o'brian wa snot in the flat. Given the police witnesses I agree with gem, that I think the PJ may have been able to point that one out. He says he did not go into the children's bedroom, but as it was a multi-room flat rather than studio style this does not contradict his statement about being in the flat itself.
And to work out when the child was last seen and heard everyone needs to put in what they did to ensure that in actual fact they were not the last ones to hear or see the child. For instance matt had checked the children at nine thirtyish, now it woudl be easy for someone else to assume he had heard or seen madeleine and say she was last seen at nine thoirty, but by making a timeline and getting people to say what happened when, they coudl easily dismiss this since it turne dout matt had not actually gone into the room. the same with everyone else, it needed to be known if they had heard madeleine as they went past. Plus it is useful to know if they were close by and if they saw anything. For instance, jane stated later she saw a man carrying a child. Now if it had turne dout one of the others had actually spoken to him and he was just a father with his own child that woudl have been cleared up straight away. But importantly a timeline idenetifies who last saw or heard madeleine. And again I have never heard a missing children's charity advise not to do this.
hesitation a year after an event when describing it is hardly a sign of deception. I suspect those that want to implicate the mccanns would say it was deceptive if she rolled out a hesitation free speech with no prompting errs, or erms etc, and claim it was prepared.
So the picture shows the rear patio entrances, where then are the supposed according to your posts dark alleyways?
As for the comment about the patios being more secluded, I dont see it they are all pretty much the same and it is a total waste of time to mention the patio doors because everyone elses were locked, therefore the only entrance would be the front door (you know, the ones down dark secluded alleyways or whatever)
Odd though that the McCanns apartment was the nearest one to the road and they chose to leave the patio door open, even though it was so close to the main road
So the abductor (or car thief) just knows that the doors of the apartment (or the car) are unlocked does he?
Or does he have to try all the doors and finds the one that is unlocked, because from what I understand about car thieves, it takes seconds to open one, so why would it matter if it was locked or unlocked?
For the supposed abductor that we have no evidence at all of, to have known the patio door was unlocked he would either have had to had inside knowledge or would have been watching the apartment and also known that the door could not be locked from the outside, but then, had the time to leave by the front door which again may have been locked, why not go throught the already used patio door?
why mess about trying to find a different exit?
Are we to believe that the abductor entered by the patio door just after Gerry McCann left but then managed to almost fly to the end of the street in time to have Jane Tanner see him (but not Gerrry McCann or jeremy Wilkins) and before that in the seconds he was picking up Madeleine who miraculously managed to stay asleep, opened the windows, busted the shutters and then managed to get out the locked or unlocked front door?
totally unbelievable in my opinion.
Your opinion on the RoB statement is merely that - an opinion, it really doesnt matter what you think, RoB states what I posted from his statement, I merely reproduced his words and your angle on what he said doesnt have any effect on those words at all to be honest, unless you have inside knowledge, you are reading from the same hymn sheet as the rest of us.
Back to your timeline comments, they do not make any difference, whoever was the last confirmed sighting of Madeleine in that apartment is the only relevant sighting, it doesnt matter at all in the early search if Matt Oldfield walkked past the window and heard nothing, it means absolutely nothing in terms of if Madeleine was there or not, what matters is the last confirmed sighting, then the Police have a timeframe for how long the child has been gone and how far she could feasibly be.
Everything else, can wait for the interviews the next day, someone walking past the apartment and not hearing anything doesnt narrow any window of opportunity at all
As for the repeated reference to missing people charities, what does that matter? isnt it the Police force that does the investigation and actual searching? Rather pointless to keep mentioning missing persons charities, I hardly think that if your child is taken from you apartment, that your first point of call would be to get n the internet and see what the missing persons chairty says, its not exactly rocket science and it certainly doesnt take a scientist to work that out lol!
k:
ullhair:
