Madeleine McCann General Discussion Thread #27

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now, in a move that must be making some folks very nervous, the PJ has also announced they are reopening their own, fresh, independent investigation.


Carrie-Marie Bratley, who works for the Portugal News in Lagoa, in the Algarve, told Sky News the Portuguese detectives "were chosen for their emotional and physical distance from this case in the hope that maybe they could go over it with a fine-tooth comb and come up with something, which it seems they may have done."

The team is separate to the group of six Portuguese officers based in Faro who have been assisting the Metropolitan Police
.

http://news.sky.com/story/1159161/madeleine-mccann-portugal-cops-reopen-case

This is starting to get really exciting.
 
It is time people face the fact that The McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance. She was taken and by someone that did not have the last name of Mccann.

http://news.yahoo.com/report-portugal-reopens-madeleine-mccann-case-122724598.html

The fact that Portugal is reopening the investigation, Proves that they did not get it right. It is time to look at it by the facts.

" Portuguese prosecutors have ordered police to reopen their investigation into the disappearance of British girl Madeleine McCann after a review of the evidence found new leads in the case, Portugal's state broadcaster and British police said Thursday."


I won't exclude them until we find out definitely what happened to Madeleine, but I lean towards abduction-just barely.
 
I'm new to this forum and before reading here I was certain the parents weren't involved and now after reading all of the theories and information that hasn't received media attention I'm not sure what to think. I am leaning more to the idea that the parents drugged the children to keep them sleeping whilst they dined but Maddie overdosed and they tried to cover it up. They would of had access to the drugs and would of had a knowledge of dosage amounts, foolproof in their eyes until it went horribly wrong, I can't understand why Kate was suspicious about the twins not waking throughout the commotion of discovering Maddie's disappearance and had to check they were still breathing yet they weren't taken to hospital to get checked over, even amidst the panic and upset of trying to find Maddie, I'd want to make sure my other children were safe. I'd like to think that she was abducted and that one day she'll be discovered if the parents are innocent. It will be very interesting to see what the new investigation uncovers but whatever happens I can't bear to think about the pain and suffering Maddie must have gone through if she is found alive. :(


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

As far as I know, there isn't any evidence that the parents sedated the children other than the fact that they are both doctors, vacationing with more doctors. Interesting theory because of the ruckus the previous night, but, no evidence that has been made public
 
It proves they are finally listening to the rest of the world. If they are opening the case back up, There is a reason.

I don't believe the McCanns had anything to do with this crime. There is nothing whatsoever that says they did except conjecture and a lot of made up scenarios.

Do you still think Jane Tanner's witnessing of the man carrying "Maddie" has merit?
 
It proves they are finally listening to the rest of the world. If they are opening the case back up, There is a reason.

I don't believe the McCanns had anything to do with this crime. <modsnip>.

Scarlett, if the rest of the world are suspects, then the McCanns are included in that "world" as so IMO they should not be ruled out, either.
 
I have to wait till Saturday morning before you all catch up. :D

Waitaminute....does that mean I'm ahead, or actually behind? :waitasec: :scared:

I can't even contemplate time zones... Daylight savings time messes me up for weeks!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
 
Denver (U.S.A. - Colorado) Friday, October 25, 2013 at 8:00:00 AM MDT UTC-6 hours

New York (U.S.A. - New York) Friday, October 25, 2013 at 10:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 hours

London (United Kingdom - England) Friday, October 25, 2013 at 3:00:00 PM BST UTC+1 hour

Sydney (Australia - New South Wales) Saturday, October 26, 2013 at 1:00:00 AM AEDT UTC+11 hours

Los Angeles (U.S.A. - California) Friday, October 25, 2013 at 7:00:00 AM PDT UTC-7 hours
 
<modsnip> The McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance. She was taken and by someone that did not have the last name of Mccann.

http://news.yahoo.com/report-portugal-reopens-madeleine-mccann-case-122724598.html

The fact that Portugal is reopening the investigation, Proves that they did not get it right. It is time to look at it by the facts.

" Portuguese prosecutors have ordered police to reopen their investigation into the disappearance of British girl Madeleine McCann after a review of the evidence found new leads in the case, Portugal's state broadcaster and British police said Thursday."
Thank God you made his post. :seeya::loveyou:
 
Scarlett, if the rest of the world are suspects, then the McCanns are included in that "world" as so IMO they should not be ruled out, either.

The quote SS posted up thread said the Mccanns we're not suspect.
 
Denver (U.S.A. - Colorado)Friday, October 25, 2013 at 8:00:00 AMMDTUTC-6 hours

New York (U.S.A. - New York)Friday, October 25, 2013 at 10:00:00 AMEDTUTC-4 hours

London (United Kingdom - England)Friday, October 25, 2013 at 3:00:00 PMBSTUTC+1 hour

Sydney (Australia - New South Wales)Saturday, October 26, 2013 at 1:00:00 AMAEDTUTC+11 hours

Los Angeles (U.S.A. - California)Friday, October 25, 2013 at 7:00:00 AMPDTUTC-7 hours

Show off!

:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
 
NEWS FROM PORTUGAL:

A report from state broadcaster RTP has this evening stated that Kate and Gerry McCann have been excluded as having had any involvement in the disappearance of their daughter.

http://www.theportugalnews.com/

I would love to hear comments re this.. especially from a person who is often quoted in here - Joana Morales :)

Hope she realises now how much harm she has done to Madeleine herself by her blahblahing !

Joana Morais only transcribes ALL information for this case its very useful. She even transcribed this article so we could READ it......


Transcript
Rogério Alves - The reopening of the investigation means that there are new leads, new paths which weren't explored and that now the Judiciary police will undertake a new search, or, rather a new set of investigative lines in order to reach the truth. That's what matters, to reach the truth. The family was informed of this reopening of the process. the family was informed of the reason behind the reopening of the process, and the family knows as well that this new line of investigation excludes any responsibility of the parents.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

'Everyone is getting excited even me that we might find out what happened to Maddy. If the parents are innocent of harming her thats fine by me.....I still will however never forgive them for their terrible parenting but that is how i feel. I have always been on the fence....

BUT they are looking at stuff that MIGHT be of interest it could all turn into NOTHING.

The worrying thing for the McCanns really is the PJ say the investigation by the SY is not nothing to do with their investigation, so are we to assume the SY have not RULED the McCanns out.............:fence:
 
I was one of those who suspected the boyfriend. The stats show that a high percentage of murders are committed by someone close to the victim.

Actually me too, we live not a long way from there, and i even went to the crime scene actually have been past that area on the way to work when i was going to meetings in Clifton. I realised quickly that the boyfriend really could not have done it he was where he said he was etc.

What worried me more was that no one saw this poor girl laying on the ground....jeez....... I think this was a sticking point to the investigation to be honest as it made no sense. She could have easily been seen its beyond me no one saw her really..I was shocked.

I did think though it could be Murat but there was so much rubbish from the Media accusing some old guy and stuff the real evidence got missed out.

I often thought she bumped into him on the way home with her pizza etc and as they were both on their own they decided to share. i think this was totally unpremeditated...poor thing it was a terrible case.
 
I'm really curious about the information they have that seems to exclude the McCanns.

Yes but it didnt say excludes the McCanns and their friends did it.

ALSO sometimes these things have a happen of going back round to the beginning.
 
I'm really curious about the information they have that seems to exclude the McCanns.

Yes but it didnt say excludes the McCanns and their friends did it.

ALSO sometimes these things have a happen of going back round to the beginning.

What they need to do is have a few detectives go over each Tapas member rogatories or whatever they're called with a fine-toothed comb. Then compare each individual's story to each other's, see where the holes and inconsistencies are....those are the things they're lying about. Then go about trying to find the truth of the times they are lying about. Within that puzzle is where they'll solve the case, IMO. Something which could have been done a long time ago if they weren't dilly-dallying and trying to search the world for the "abductor."
 
such as this from the Jane Tanner rogatory: (why she didn't immediately tell Kate about the Eggman she saw carrying a child)

"I didn&#8217;t want to say to Kate at that point, which might sound odd now, you know, &#8216;Oh why wouldn&#8217;t you say
straight away to Kate&#8217;, but, you know, the thought of telling the mother of a child
that you might have seen being carried away is, it&#8217;s too horrible to even say."

Uhhh....okay. First of all, she mentions that she realizes now that people think it's odd, why didn't you tell Kate right away? So basically she is just saying it now when she realizes they made a mistake in their whole 'abduction" plan.

Secondly....oh really, so everyone is frantically searching for your friend's daughter, and you realize that you might have just seen the daughter being taken away, but you don't say anything about it?? So it's better to just let some man continue taking her and not tell anyone so you won't have to "talk about it."?? So the actual physical part of saying is it WORSE THAN THE ABDUCTION?

That is a big fat lie. She is just saying it now to cover her 🤬🤬*.

Ain't no reason in the world for these big whopping lies like that one........if they truly know truly know nothing about what happened to Madeleine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
812
Total visitors
1,008

Forum statistics

Threads
625,969
Messages
18,517,356
Members
240,918
Latest member
mukluk
Back
Top