Madeleine McCann General Discussion Thread #27

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maddie couldn't die earlier in the week, as she was in the creche the day of the alleged kidapping. She was signed in and signed out, and I don't think that her caregiver in there could confuse her with some other girl. I don't also believe in a substitute theory, the creche staff would have get totally blind to not recognize that it wasn't the same girl they had under their care for the last few days.


I am not suggesting that her caregiver confused her with someone else. I don't believe in the substitute theory at all.

I am well aware of the crèche records. They are handwritten pieces of paper - barely fit for audit as an accurate 'register' of those in attendance at the crèche as the entries are not verified, upon entry or collection, by a signature of a staff member.

There does not always show a signature by a parent collecting a child. It seems that many people are willing to trust the crèche records as accurate, yet if this is the case, what happened to Madeleine being collected on the 1st, for example, as there is no collection entry?

Just curious.
 
I always start with the parents. In this case that is where I started as well. But I just don't see it here at all. In reading the early Portugeuse reports, it really seemed to me that the Portuguese police did NOT think the McCanns were acting suspiciously. Investigator after instigator were asked if the mother was behaving unusually or unexpectedly--they all reported NO. Her behavior was normal for the situation. After the dogs had their hits in the apartment and car, it seemed like that tilted things to the point where they had to declare the McCann's suspects--to afford them additional legal rights and protections--but they seemed to me to do so acknowledging that otherwise, in all other ways, they did not seem to have committed this crime.

It makes no sense that all these other friends would lie for them. That is just crazy. People act in their own self interest. they would not risk everything to lie for the guilty parents. So, since they wouldn't lie, their witness testimony is solid.

It really does seem like one has to come up with a lot of assumptions to make it be true that the parents did it in this case. The friends are lying. Why? They must have some big secrets to hide, too. One or ore of them are psychopathic pedophiles. And then there's all the conspiracy theory stuff about politics and the wealthy and pulling strings in high places. It's just too many leaps.

The latest articles seem to me to be clearly pointing toward an intruder. There were witness testimonies about creepy guys and one even looking in someone's crib in the apartment upstairs. There's the scam charity guys knocking on doors. Burglaries. That looks to me like the direction SY and now the Portuguese police are heading in. JMO
 
Saying Madeleine died earlier than the evening of 3 May means that Catriona Baker the crèche worker is also lying.

What is her motive?

Catriona Baker states that in the same room as Madeleine, there were 6 other children in the morning and 4 in the afternoon (including Madeleine).

All the children from the Minis Club go to the beach that morning between 10:00 and 11:00, according to 24horas, based on Catriona Baker's account.



24horas continues: 'After arriving at the beach, little Maddie's group walked along the beach walk to an area where a red parasol and several sunshades were located. The children were prepared for a boat ride.


'For approximately one hour, Maddie and her mates rode in a small yellow catamaran, always under the attentive eyes of two employees.'


Why oh why is everyone else "lying" or "mistaken" apart from the McCann?
 
Entirely possible if the friends had their own sins and McCanns knew it. It's pretty easy for a doctor to lose his (or her) job and reputation.

So, all of the 'friends' had previous sins, even the old lady and even the ones the McCanns might have seen only few times in their life before this event, like Rachel and Matt and McCanns quickly remembered these sins and then blackmailed the group??

Sorry.. but this is laughable to me :))) To much drama..
 
So, all of the 'friends' had previous sins, even the old lady and even the ones the McCanns might have seen only few times in their life before this event, like Rachel and Matt and McCanns quickly remembered these sins and then blackmailed the group??

Sorry.. but this is laughable to me :))) To much drama..

You're in the UK correct?

Have any of the majors printed the story about the supressed efits?
 
You're in the UK correct?

Have any of the majors printed the story about the supressed efits?

Here's the beginning of a story in today's Sunday Times:

THE critical new evidence at the centre of Scotland Yard’s search for Madeleine McCann was kept secret for five years after it was presented to her parents by ex-MI5 investigators.

The evidence was in fact taken from an intelligence report produced for Gerry and Kate McCann by a firm of former spies in 2008.

It contained crucial E-Fits of a man seen carrying a child on the night of Madeleine’s disappearance, which have only this month become public after he was identified as the prime suspect by Scotland Yard.

A team of hand-picked former MI5 agents had been hired by the McCanns to chase a much-needed breakthrough in the search for their missing daughter Madeleine.


Post 883-a couple of pages back- has more of the story.
 
You're in the UK correct?

Have any of the majors printed the story about the supressed efits?

Yes the daily telegraph mentioned the story and the daily star, one of the bad tabloids.

<modsnip>. but the police seams has passed this step and is no longer looking at the parents.. so now only the bad parenting can be used for smearing :)

Regarding the actual search for Madeleine there are news that SY is to travel to Portugal to interview some more witnesses :)
 
OMG. Hmmm.....wonder why the Smith sighting and report "critical" of the Tapas9 would be rejected by the fund....hmmm....I don't think it takes a genius to figure that one out.

I still for the life of me DO NOT know how these two people (kate and Gerry) have been able to fool the entire Portugal investigative team, the entire Scotland yard team, and dozens if not hundred of "private" top-notch detectives/investigators. Aren't they a little embarrased to not be able to come up with the fact that Kate and Gerry "disappeared" Madeleine? IMO, MOO.

And yes, I'm including Pj because if they haven't the ba*** to admit it was Kate and Gerry, then they too have been fooled.

One of the problems has been that the body has never been found.

Gerry once said, "Find the body and prove we killed her."
 
So, all of the 'friends' had previous sins, even the old lady and even the ones the McCanns might have seen only few times in their life before this event, like Rachel and Matt and McCanns quickly remembered these sins and then blackmailed the group??

Sorry.. but this is laughable to me :))) To much drama..

They spent holidays together, who said all they did was nice and perfectly legal? And it's not like they barely knew each other. Fiona was working with Kate at some point, then you have this (from Rachael Oldfield statement):

Reply 'Erm well Matt, Matt worked with Gerry at the Glenfield, I dont know when it was though, I mean before, before Matt and I were married anyway , erm so thats how, thats how he knew Gerry and Matt lived with erm Russell and Dave, because they were all medical students in Leicester.

So it seems Gerry know the other males pretty well, as they were befriended since their medical studies, and then he worked with Matt at some point.

Jane Tanner also stated that the Tapas Group was "a very comfortable group". You don't say that about the people you barely know, and you don't take on holidays with you the people you last saw on someone's wedding and you don't know who they really are.

So they knew each other well enough to feel comfortable in their company and I suppose enough to share some dirty little secrets and to not always behave perfectly
well (nobody said that it had to be old sins, not me anyway).

And, as I stated before, I think the old lady, Dianne Webster, was not the part of the Tapas Pact.
 
Yes the daily telegraph mentioned the story and the daily star, one of the bad tabloids.

[modsnip].. but the police seams has passed this step and is no longer looking at the parents.. so now only the bad parenting can be used for smearing :)

Regarding the actual search for Madeleine there are news that SY is to travel to Portugal to interview some more witnesses :)

[modsnip]

The Times article states that the Investigators report was presented to Team McCann in November 2008.

Here are Gerry's blogs for November 2008 -



09 Nov 08

556

A difficult week for Kate and me ended on a positive note last night. Monday was the 3rd of November- 18 months since Madeleine was so cruelly taken from us. We do not usually put a lot of store in specific milestones - these being just another day without Madeleine. This week was unusual in that both Kate and I were feeling low at the same time, which is an uncommon occurrence, and we can usually rely on one of us lifting the other.

We continue to work very hard behind the scenes. Our support team has been expanded as we try to identify what has been done, what has not been done and what can still be done to help find Madeleine. We are not yet halfway through the Portuguese files but there is less information within the files than we were expecting. As I have stated many times, someone has a key bit of information that can unlock this frustratingly difficult and painful situation.

Yesterday we went through to Liverpool for a Race Night organised by the Greenhills Taverners Society- a group who organise fundraising events for local good causes- along with family and friends. On this occasion all proceeds were going towards Madeleines Fund. Around 200 people turned up and everyone enjoyed a good night. Liverpool and Everton donated signed shirts which were auctioned and with tickets and a raffle around £2000 has been raised. A taxi driver, taking home some of our friends, even got in to the spirit of things by donating his fare to the fund. Well done everyone and thanks for all the messages of support prayers- we left Liverpool in much better spirits than when we arrived!

10 Nov 08

557

Correction to my entry last night. After adding all the money up the total raised at the race night was actually £5000! Well done everyone in Liverpool.


Not one word about the report or the e-fits, and no posts at all during December 2008. He's managed a sledge against the PJ though.

:waitasec:
 
I am not suggesting that her caregiver confused her with someone else. I don't believe in the substitute theory at all.

I am well aware of the crèche records. They are handwritten pieces of paper - barely fit for audit as an accurate 'register' of those in attendance at the crèche as the entries are not verified, upon entry or collection, by a signature of a staff member.

There does not always show a signature by a parent collecting a child. It seems that many people are willing to trust the crèche records as accurate, yet if this is the case, what happened to Madeleine being collected on the 1st, for example, as there is no collection entry?

Just curious.

So Catriona Baker is a part of the conspiracy? Because she stated she saw Maddie that day in creche. And not only her, other staff members too, AFAIK.
 
They spent holidays together, who said all they did was nice and perfectly legal? And it's not like they barely knew each other. Fiona was working with Kate at some point, then you have this (from Rachael Oldfield statement):

Reply 'Erm well Matt, Matt worked with Gerry at the Glenfield, I dont know when it was though, I mean before, before Matt and I were married anyway , erm so thats how, thats how he knew Gerry and Matt lived with erm Russell and Dave, because they were all medical students in Leicester.

So it seems Gerry know the other males pretty well, as they were befriended since their medical studies, and then he worked with Matt at some point.

Jane Tanner also stated that the Tapas Group was "a very comfortable group". You don't say that about the people you barely know, and you don't take on holidays with you the people you last saw on someone's wedding and you don't know who they really are.

So they knew each other well enough to feel comfortable in their company and I suppose enough to share some dirty little secrets and to not always behave perfectly well.

Dunno. We actually often meet up with & vacation with a family we met on vacation about 10 years ago. I don't know any of their secrets. They're fun, our kids get along great.. And aside from vacations.. We really don't communicate all that much....like 6-7 conversations a year. our kids talk more on FaceTime or oovoo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
 
They spent holidays together, who said all they did was nice and perfectly legal? And it's not like they barely knew each other. Fiona was working with Kate at some point, then you have this (from Rachael Oldfield statement):

Reply 'Erm well Matt, Matt worked with Gerry at the Glenfield, I dont know when it was though, I mean before, before Matt and I were married anyway , erm so thats how, thats how he knew Gerry and Matt lived with erm Russell and Dave, because they were all medical students in Leicester.

So it seems Gerry know the other males pretty well, as they were befriended since their medical studies, and then he worked with Matt at some point.

Jane Tanner also stated that the Tapas Group was "a very comfortable group". You don't say that about the people you barely know, and you don't take on holidays with you the people you last saw on someone's wedding and you don't know who they really are.

So they knew each other well enough to feel comfortable in their company and I suppose enough to share some dirty little secrets and to not always behave perfectly
well (nobody said that it had to be old sins, not me anyway).

And, as I stated before, I think the old lady, Dianne Webster, was not the part of the Tapas Pact.

No way 7 people would lie about a death of a child to cover another pair.

This is a fantasy!

And it is not true they knew each other that well. Matt Oldfield claims he did work with Gerry but they would only speak in meetings at work

eah, erm, primarily the connection is through, erm, Russell and Jane, erm, Russell was Rachael and mine Best Man and we've been good friends since we went to University together in Leicester and originally he went out with a girl in my year called Ann SMITH and then when I was looking for accommodation Ann mentioned that he had a space in his house, so there was two girls, Russell, Paul and myself and we made up the house and we sort of shared the rental at a house there and we've sort of been friends ever since and then, as I say, he was Best Man for Rachael and I when we got married in nineteen ninety-nine, erm, and we stayed in contact pretty much since. We've been on hol... well we'll probably come onto holiday and stuff later. But through Russell I know David, who was also at Leicester Medical School, and Fiona WEBSTER, who is also, erm, Fiona PAYNE as she is now, erm, it was also at Leicester Medical School and they were two years behind me, so they graduated in ninety-four and I graduated in ninety-two, they know Gerry and Kate or they knew them on a much sort of more friendly level than, than I did. Erm, so I knew Gerry because we worked together in, I think, two thousand and two, erm, when we were at the Leicester General Hospital, so we knew each other on the, erm, on call rota, so we’d be together at sort of medical meetings, erm, but we didn’t sort of socialise more than sort of a quick chat at that point in time. And then we really got to know them when David and Fiona got married in two thousand and three, when we went, when they got, they were married in Italy and we, erm, there was a big group of people that went out, erm, all the group that were out in Portugal were there as well, and we shared an apartment with Gerry and Kate and Madeleine, she was about sort of four months old then, four months, it was around about September so she'd be about four or five months old then, and there were other people within the apartment, there was Stuart and Tara and, I think that was it, I think there was six adults and the children, and so we spent sort of a long weekend there for the wedding and so we got to know them a little bit at that point. But then we didn't really have any other contact, apart from, erm, hearing about them through David and Fiona and Russell and Jane, erm, from them. And then the holiday came about because, erm, independently we'd been on sort of various holidays and we'd sort of often talked about them, you know, sort of being friends and we then went on a joint holiday to Greece the year before with David and Fiona, Russell and Jane, erm, but not with the McCANNs, we'd been to Greece, erm, and sort of spent a week on the beach there and then sort of thought about booking a holiday the next year and then Dave and Fiona, I think they'd already been on holiday with Gerry and Kate on another occasion, they wanted to involve them in the group and we ended up going for a MARK WARNER complex in Portugal. Erm, that was, erm, we'd been to, as I say, some of us had been to MARK WARNER, erm, various MARK WARNER resorts before, we'd been to the Greek one in Lemnos, erm, originally before Grace was born, it was just a last minute deal and it was great, it was all inclusive, we all like sport, erm, and sunshine and, erm, it was sort of all inclusive and it was just a very, erm, sort of relaxing sort of place to go, so we went out there and we were quite keen to do that again because everybody in the group is pretty sporty, erm, and if you have a lot of people together you can share sort of the child care arrangements and it's also very relaxing for everybody. Because when we went to Greece it was like the fastest holiday I'd ever been on because there was only about an hour when they were asleep at lunch each day and a couple of hours in the evening where you were actually sort off child care duties, so the week went by in about sort of six hours, it was all sort of, it was very quick. And so we, we went, we talked about whether we'd go back to MARK WARNER, I think, and David and Fiona had looked at various resorts and, erm, chose the Portugal one because it fitted better with time. Erm, in terms of, I mean, originally we were booked, we got the, we actually (inaudible) got the week off that they, that sort of fitted, but we were originally going to go to the Lake District with Rachael's parents but we ended up going, saying that, yes, we'd move that and change that for another week and go out. Erm, and various emails, everybody got sort of tied down to doing it and we booked and then went out".

4078 "In relation to Gerry and Kate then, just to clarify what you have said. You met them at David and Fiona's wedding?"

Reply "Yeah".
 
The McCann fund source said the Oakley report was passed on to new private investigators after the contract ended, but that the firm’s work was considered “contaminated” by the financial dispute.

He said the fund wanted to continue to pursue information about the man seen by Tanner, and it would have been too expensive to investigate both sightings in full — so the Smith E-Fits were not publicised. It was also considered necessary to threaten legal action against the authors.

“[The report] was hypercritical of the people involved . . . It just wouldn’t be conducive to the investigation to have that report publicly declared because . . . the newspapers would have been all over it. And it would have been completely distracting,” said the source.

A statement released by the Find Madeleine fund said that “all information privately gathered during the search for Madeleine has been fully acted upon where necessary” and had been passed to Scotland Yard.

It continued: “Throughout the investigation, the Find Madeleine fund’s sole priority has been, and remains, to find Madeleine and bring her home as swiftly as possible.”

Insight: Heidi Blake and Jonathan Calvert


What?????

All information privately gathered during the search for Madeleine has been fully acted upon when necessary???

A very odd statement imo. I'd have supposed them to be kicking themselves hard at the news that the sighting and the e-fit they swept under the rug is now considered the most important lead... This man's face could have been in the news five years ago and it could have produced a witness and taken them to Madeleine and saved her five years of whatever-she's-going-thru...

But it was not "necessary" to act upon this information. Why not?

How can they not consider it "necessary" to pursue a sighting of a possible abductor carrying Madeleine off?

Only two reasons that I can think of. Either they don't think it was Madeleine and the abductor or they don't think that finding the abductor is "necessary" after all.

Anyway, I don't understand the comment about it being too costly to pursue both sightings. How many millions did they get? How much would it have cost to put the Smith e-fits on their Find Madeleine page that they paid for anyway??? Or print a few copies and take them to one of the interviews that the parents were doing anyway. How much would it have cost for Clarence Mitchell to have issued a statement to say, Please take a look at these images and see if you know this man, and then forward all the tips to the police.
 
No way 7 people would lie about a death of a child to cover another pair.

This is a fantasy!

And it is not true they knew each other that well. Matt Oldfield claims he did work with Gerry but they would only speak in meetings at work

Assuming that a group of people lie to cover up a crime or crimes, they could just as easily lie about the extent of their acquaintance. Just because someone says something in an interview doesn't mean that it's necessarily true. Let's say Randy and Tom know each other because they have trafficked drugs and committed other crimes together - they're not going to volunteer that information if the police asks.

I'm not saying they're covering anything up, just saying that if we assume that they could be liars we can't determine the truth is something because they say so.
 
No way 7 people would lie about a death of a child to cover another pair.

This is a fantasy!

The Tapas Group might not even know what really happened. I wouldn't be surprised if the McCanns sold them the soft version of events, telling it was an accident, but the PJ would not believe it so, OMG, help us to cover it up. Some British people don't trust the foreigners, so that could have sounded believable for them. And if there were their own lives and careers at the stake...

And it is not true they knew each other that well. Matt Oldfield claims he did work with Gerry but they would only speak in meetings at work

But later they started to socialize together. So theit brief chats at work does not exclude them knowing each other pretty well.
 
Only two reasons that I can think of. Either they don't think it was Madeleine and the abductor or they don't think that finding the abductor is "necessary" after all.

At the time they had 'new advisers' .. god knows what they were advised by the new group. Everyone assure the customers they are the best. Plus the firm that created the efits was a bit criminalised, one of the PIs being a crook and other caught in the airport stealing perfumes.. so these PIs and EX spies weren't exactly 'perfect'


,
and then forward all the tips to the police.

and which police that would be? the case was closed in Portugal and SY at the time would say 'it is a Portuguese matter'
 
But later they started to socialize together. So theit brief chats at work does not exclude them knowing each other pretty well.

When was that? I thought Oldfield lived in a completely different town?

It was not a close friends group who meet often. Fullstop.
 
At the time they had 'new advisers' .. god knows what they were advised by the new group. Everyone assure the customers they are the best. Plus the firm that created the efits was a bit criminalised, one of the PIs being a crook and other caught in the airport stealing perfumes.. so these PIs and EX spies weren't exactly 'perfect'


,

and which police that would be? the case was closed in Portugal and SY at the time would say 'it is a Portuguese matter'


Of course it would be kind of annoying to have hired crooked detectives but I don't know how or why their sins would make the Smith sighting any less valuable. It was not a perfume-stealing detective reporting it, it was an Irish family. If it was my missing child and someone said they saw the abductor, I would want it investigated, no matter what.
 
[modsnip]

The Times article states that the Investigators report was presented to Team McCann in November 2008.

Here are Gerry's blogs for November 2008 -



09 Nov 08

556

A difficult week for Kate and me ended on a positive note last night. Monday was the 3rd of November- 18 months since Madeleine was so cruelly taken from us. We do not usually put a lot of store in specific milestones - these being just another day without Madeleine. This week was unusual in that both Kate and I were feeling low at the same time, which is an uncommon occurrence, and we can usually rely on one of us lifting the other.

We continue to work very hard behind the scenes. Our support team has been expanded as we try to identify what has been done, what has not been done and what can still be done to help find Madeleine. We are not yet halfway through the Portuguese files but there is less information within the files than we were expecting. As I have stated many times, someone has a key bit of information that can unlock this frustratingly difficult and painful situation.

Yesterday we went through to Liverpool for a Race Night organised by the Greenhills Taverners Society- a group who organise fundraising events for local good causes- along with family and friends. On this occasion all proceeds were going towards Madeleines Fund. Around 200 people turned up and everyone enjoyed a good night. Liverpool and Everton donated signed shirts which were auctioned and with tickets and a raffle around £2000 has been raised. A taxi driver, taking home some of our friends, even got in to the spirit of things by donating his fare to the fund. Well done everyone and thanks for all the messages of support prayers- we left Liverpool in much better spirits than when we arrived!

10 Nov 08

557

Correction to my entry last night. After adding all the money up the total raised at the race night was actually £5000! Well done everyone in Liverpool.


Not one word about the report or the e-fits, and no posts at all during December 2008. He's managed a sledge against the PJ though.

:waitasec:

[modsnip]

But things right now are different. I didn't see either PJ or SY arresting these parents but they put past behind and they are actually searching for Madeleine.
For Madeleine!
Who else is important here?

Re funds Kate is mentioning. At the time they had to pay for the spanish PIs from the fund.. God know what 'reports' and 'calls' they had at the time and they could only relay on these new PIs as there was no active police force looking for Madeleine.
And for these searches they had to pay themselves from the fund!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
148
Guests online
765
Total visitors
913

Forum statistics

Threads
626,077
Messages
18,520,284
Members
240,937
Latest member
dv_diversity
Back
Top