I am still not convinced the McCanns killed their daughter though.
I jump up and down off the fence.
Not being funny but a maintenance man for example could easily have access to any flat ......something always a bit off about it. I do think though she sadly died in the apartment that night.
We shall see.
Hi GoldenGirl,
I did not realise that you are on the fence. You came across to me as if you predicted that Maddie was dead. I am actually surprised that not many on this site think that Maddie is dead.
I an Australian but well-travelled and I was in Granada, Spain, in May 2007 and saw Maddie's photo at the airport, thought what a lovely little girl and felt sorry for the parents. That night in my hotel room, I watched the news and an interview of the parents. Because of their body language (which I used to teach in a Business Diploma course), I immediately suspected the parents.
When I returned to Australia, I started wondering if others felt the same way as I did so I did a search on google and found the Mirror Forum so I joined it. I have been posting my theories and observations of the McCanns and their friends ever since on various forums or just lurking.
Therefore, I am surprised that the crime sleuthers here cannot see through the McCann propaganda and read their body language. They seem to have been brainwashed by the spin of Clarence Mitchell and the McCanns in the British media and will get a big shock when the truth comes out. This is the crime of the century imo due to their deception.
I am therefore passionate enough about getting justice for Maddie to post information here which new posters may not have read before or for people like you who are on the fence.
Believe me, I have looked at every angle. My background is in psychology, lecturing, counselling and life coaching. I recognise narcissists when I see and hear them on TV. I feel so sorry for the twins who will one day wake up to the fact that their parents not only neglected them but probably abused Maddie to her death and then made money out of her demise using contributions from the public to donate to the fund for their legal defence, fraudulent libel cases, lies, blackmail, bribery, intimidation of witnesses and deceived many by acting like the poor victims.
I can only ask what do they know about Gordon Brown, Blair and his ex-Ministers, to have been afforded this amount of protection for six years already. I do not understand Cameron's part in this but he could be protecting some of his Ministers too. The only thing which makes sense to me is that many of the main players in this case were part of an elite pedophile gang organised by Brian Kennedy and the Tapas9 were part of it too. I have written many posts on this topic in the past which was considered tabou. But I did not make copies of them.
IMO it is glaringly obvious why many have lied on their behalf and/or protected them. In our society, some would rather be charged with murder than pedophilia! But pedophilia is big business especially if you have a pretty blonde 3yo to whom you can apply professional makeup, photograph and let out to others in return for cash and then blackmail them in return for covering up for you when you decide that her time on this earth has ended because she is going to start school soon and might tell her teachers about it all perhaps in an innocent way.
I read a recent case where the young girl who had been sharing a bed with her father for years and had been sexually abused told her neighbour that she was jealous that her father had suddenly taken an interest in her younger sister so he was not sharing her bed any more! The neighbour reported it to the police.
IMO Maddie was an unwanted child for some reason - did not sleep hence the charts of their fridge, was demanding of Kate, could have had health problems, etc. Parents who had not been able to conceive naturally often have problems with IVF. The Catholic Church does not agree with it either.
But because of the DNA, I have often wondered whether Maddie was adopted, whether Gerry was the father, whether Kate actually conceived her or used a surrogate, whether Maddie had CHARGE Syndrome (which affects the DNA apparently) or some other health problem due to her baggy eyes in some photos as well as the coloboma and their refusal to give the PJ her health records. It appears that the McCanns told the PJ that the children shared the same toothbrush so did the McCanns give the PJ something which belonged to Maddie only or was it Amelie's DNA they were trying to make a match with?
IMO this case is all smoke and mirrors. But I still have faith that with the forensic and circumstantial evidence plus the analysis of mobile and creche records, that even without finding the body (which the PJ are again searching for), they will have to face justice in a court of law in 2014/15. But what they will be charged for, I have no idea.
But IMO it will be interesting as to who will be charged and with what as one of them was possibly the perpetrator and the other one is covering up for the other just like the Ramseys.
There seems to be more evidence against Kate due to the cadaver scent on her clothes, CuddleCat, bloody footprints found in 5A and on the car, and her book to justify their innocence but when I saw the bruises on her arms and face in photos, I cannot help but think that Gerry abused her into submission.
IMO Gerry is the Mastermind of the whole scheme to make Maddie into a cash cow for them by copying parts of other successful abduction/murder cases and putting the best parts into this case. IMO this was a well-planned premeditated murder possibly for over a year since the twins were born.
But if Kate is the one who is charged eventually as there is more forensic evidence against her, and if she is innocent of Maddie's demise, will she put Gerry in?
Or was it one of the other Tapas men?
There is absolutely IMO no evidence of an abductor and, if so, it was Gerry faking one.
