snowpea666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2020
- Messages
- 489
- Reaction score
- 1,762
Hi, Just looking back at bits, I think we did but not sure, did we ever find out who woman in plum/purple was ??
A bit more info on the complaint against JR:
"Now his lawyer Jürgen Fülscher (sic?) writes about the Sat1 documentary: "This documentary was poorly researched and only served to promote a campaign of prejudgment." He has filed a criminal complaint against the TV journalist Jutta Rabe on behalf of CB, who is currently serving a prison sentence in Germany for raping a 72-year-old woman, which we have."
"His lawyer Friedrich Fülscher has now filed a criminal complaint on behalf of Christian B. "on suspicion of defamation" against the TV journalist Rabe, whose documentary was broadcast on Sat1 a week ago. His accusation: the public prosecutor Christian Wolters explained his "strategy" against CB to the reporter. Rabe claimed this in a talk show after the film. Not even he, as a defense attorney, has had access to the files. The prosecutor contradicts in an e-mail to the defense attorney, which we have: "I have neither disclosed a strategy to her nor spoken specifically about the evidence."
"Journalist Rabe also gave the impression that there were fingerprints and DNA traces in two other proceedings against the Würzburger (for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child). The prosecutor writes that this is wrong."
"So far, no complaint nor any accusations against Spiegel TV's Gudrun Altrogge, who is responsible for the other documentary about the suspect that was broadcast on Vox for Spiegel TV, has yet been received from the lawyer."
Maddie-Entführung: Verdächtiger aus Würzburg zeigt TV-Reporterin an
Interesting, thanks for posting.
So who to believe? Why would JR make this claim in the doc if it's not true?
Someone's being economical with the truth here.
Hi, Just looking back at bits, I think we did but not sure, did we ever find out who woman in plum/purple was ??
A sum of £26,834 has been set aside as “provisions for liabilities”, which appears to be a sum Kate and Gerry McCann may have to pay ex Portuguese police chief Goncalo Amaral if they lose a long-running libel battle.
Thanks for that Pixi, just could not find it, so much info to keep track of and my notes are very questionableSeems like British Police thought it was LT. (There was a 2nd witness other than JM.)
https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/it-wasnt-me-waitress-who-11573764.amp
Interesting, thanks for posting.
So who to believe? Why would JR make this claim in the doc if it's not true?
Someone's being economical with the truth here.
Yes it doesn't appear they take so much care when writing or reprinting an article. Just add a few new things and the rest just remains the same over the years. Well, the Sun is not the pinnacle of journalismFrom your link
They lost this case years ago!
You have to laugh at how the Sun just reprints the same nonsense every year.
The provision is most likely for their own legal fees in their ECHR case which of course does not involve GA
Yes it doesn't appear they take so much care when writing or reprinting an article. Just add a few new things and the rest just remains the same over the years. Well, the Sun is not the pinnacle of journalism![]()
Haha really? No surprise!I think we actually had this exact same conversation in '20?
Hmmm maybe that he was 30 min away with the fling, or not?Still haven’t fell of my chair though…. Wonder what that revelation is?!?![]()
....1 year and nothing really new?!From Sandra F. Instagram account
sandrafelgueiras_oficial Este documentário da SAT 1 levanta uma questão já investigada por mim há mais de um ano: poderia Christian Bruckner ter agido sozinho no desaparecimento de Madeleine. Segundo esta repórter alemã, o número misterioso que terá ligado a Bruckner na noite em que Madeleine desapareceu terá pertencido a Nicole F, a mulher que investiguei como a sua mais provável cúmplice neste programa. Reveja em @rtpplay programa @sextaas9_rtp - programa 25 Setembro 2020
Google translating and summarizing it: she refers to NF since it appears the SAT1 docu had witnesses saying that the other number belonged to NF and whether indeed CB could have acted alone. Linking to her own docu where she 'exposed' NF as his accomplice...
Login • Instagram
The same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .Still haven’t fell of my chair though…. Wonder what that revelation is?!?![]()
His criminalityThe same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .
The same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .
It was actually FF quoted as having evidence to make us fall off our chairsThe same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .