Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #28

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #881
Hi, Just looking back at bits, I think we did but not sure, did we ever find out who woman in plum/purple was ??
 
  • #882
A bit more info on the complaint against JR:

"Now his lawyer Jürgen Fülscher (sic?) writes about the Sat1 documentary: "This documentary was poorly researched and only served to promote a campaign of prejudgment." He has filed a criminal complaint against the TV journalist Jutta Rabe on behalf of CB, who is currently serving a prison sentence in Germany for raping a 72-year-old woman, which we have."

"His lawyer Friedrich Fülscher has now filed a criminal complaint on behalf of Christian B. "on suspicion of defamation" against the TV journalist Rabe, whose documentary was broadcast on Sat1 a week ago. His accusation: the public prosecutor Christian Wolters explained his "strategy" against CB to the reporter. Rabe claimed this in a talk show after the film. Not even he, as a defense attorney, has had access to the files. The prosecutor contradicts in an e-mail to the defense attorney, which we have: "I have neither disclosed a strategy to her nor spoken specifically about the evidence."

"Journalist Rabe also gave the impression that there were fingerprints and DNA traces in two other proceedings against the Würzburger (for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child). The prosecutor writes that this is wrong."

"So far, no complaint nor any accusations against Spiegel TV's Gudrun Altrogge, who is responsible for the other documentary about the suspect that was broadcast on Vox for Spiegel TV, has yet been received from the lawyer."


Maddie-Entführung: Verdächtiger aus Würzburg zeigt TV-Reporterin an

Interesting, thanks for posting.

So who to believe? Why would JR make this claim in the doc if it's not true?

Someone's being economical with the truth here.
 
  • #883
Interesting, thanks for posting.

So who to believe? Why would JR make this claim in the doc if it's not true?

Someone's being economical with the truth here.

Well I'd find it difficult that all are being extremely honest! Who do you think in particular is economical with the truth?

The thing is that usually investigative journalists or just journalists generally have sources close to the case. So indeed HCW might not have discussed the evidence with JR for sure but she knows through JC who knows from someone else close to the case. Similarly she might have deduced from what HCW told her that there is a strategy behind it but what FF and esp CB is accusing her of is for two things - his dogs and the DNA/fingerprint evidence for 2 cases which in itself is quite dubious because nowhere does JR claim they have DNA or fingerprints for both two cases. Jmo
 
  • #884
  • #885

From your link

A sum of £26,834 has been set aside as “provisions for liabilities”, which appears to be a sum Kate and Gerry McCann may have to pay ex Portuguese police chief Goncalo Amaral if they lose a long-running libel battle.

They lost this case years ago!

You have to laugh at how the Sun just reprints the same nonsense every year.

The provision is most likely for their own legal fees in their ECHR case which of course does not involve GA
 
Last edited:
  • #886
  • #887
Interesting, thanks for posting.

So who to believe? Why would JR make this claim in the doc if it's not true?

Someone's being economical with the truth here.

I wonder if the press was just getting so fast and loose with it's accusations she got careless.

That's what happened back in the day when the media breathlessly reported on PJ's case only it couldn't be backed up.

I am sure if CB had the means he would be suing in the english courts
 
  • #888
From your link



They lost this case years ago!

You have to laugh at how the Sun just reprints the same nonsense every year.

The provision is most likely for their own legal fees in their ECHR case which of course does not involve GA
Yes it doesn't appear they take so much care when writing or reprinting an article. Just add a few new things and the rest just remains the same over the years. Well, the Sun is not the pinnacle of journalism :rolleyes:
 
  • #889
Yes it doesn't appear they take so much care when writing or reprinting an article. Just add a few new things and the rest just remains the same over the years. Well, the Sun is not the pinnacle of journalism :rolleyes:

I think we actually had this exact same conversation in '20?
 
  • #890
  • #891
MWT is back on twitter in full force. Once he has the Yorkshire ripper documentary aired tomorrow, I would expect him to start tweeting a little bit about his new documentary on CB. :rolleyes:
 
  • #892
Still haven’t fell of my chair though…. Wonder what that revelation is?!? :confused:
 
  • #893
Still haven’t fell of my chair though…. Wonder what that revelation is?!? :confused:
Hmmm maybe that he was 30 min away with the fling, or not?
 
  • #894
From Sandra F. Instagram account

sandrafelgueiras_oficial Este documentário da SAT 1 levanta uma questão já investigada por mim há mais de um ano: poderia Christian Bruckner ter agido sozinho no desaparecimento de Madeleine. Segundo esta repórter alemã, o número misterioso que terá ligado a Bruckner na noite em que Madeleine desapareceu terá pertencido a Nicole F, a mulher que investiguei como a sua mais provável cúmplice neste programa. Reveja em @rtpplay programa @sextaas9_rtp - programa 25 Setembro 2020

Google translating and summarizing it: she refers to NF since it appears the SAT1 docu had witnesses saying that the other number belonged to NF and whether indeed CB could have acted alone. Linking to her own docu where she 'exposed' NF as his accomplice...

Login • Instagram
 
Last edited:
  • #895
From Sandra F. Instagram account

sandrafelgueiras_oficial Este documentário da SAT 1 levanta uma questão já investigada por mim há mais de um ano: poderia Christian Bruckner ter agido sozinho no desaparecimento de Madeleine. Segundo esta repórter alemã, o número misterioso que terá ligado a Bruckner na noite em que Madeleine desapareceu terá pertencido a Nicole F, a mulher que investiguei como a sua mais provável cúmplice neste programa. Reveja em @rtpplay programa @sextaas9_rtp - programa 25 Setembro 2020

Google translating and summarizing it: she refers to NF since it appears the SAT1 docu had witnesses saying that the other number belonged to NF and whether indeed CB could have acted alone. Linking to her own docu where she 'exposed' NF as his accomplice...

Login • Instagram
....1 year and nothing really new?!
Still in "innocuous" circles....
 
  • #896
Still haven’t fell of my chair though…. Wonder what that revelation is?!? :confused:
The same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .
 
  • #897
  • #898
The same one that was to be shocking in the German docu ? what was that again , any one remember .

I don't but I know for a fact it was shocking.

And I know for another fact that MWT's doc which, trailers have it, counters everything in JR's Sat1 doc, will be equally shocking.

These random docs need to stop and/or HCW, if he wants to retain any degree of credibility or professionalism, needs to stop engaging with and commenting on them.
 
Last edited:
  • #899
  • #900
NF ran a kind of "orphanage" for troubled (?), mostly (?) german children around an age that hasn't reached 30 years.

What has been her profession until then?

CB as a "businessman" must have been involved in some way. Obviously he could not run such a business by himself using his name, due to his former known convinction for child abuse.

The "Casa Pia" case became known around 2002, the trial started around 2004. Since when did NF ran this "institution"?

Maybe we should discuss this issue a little bit more?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
96
Guests online
2,528
Total visitors
2,624

Forum statistics

Threads
632,164
Messages
18,622,957
Members
243,041
Latest member
sawyerteam
Back
Top