Thanks for the clarification!
But just to be honest, i do not think, this charge is just based on HB's and MS's statement!
No matter what people in here say about JC he does seem to have a source in the BKA. He had the exclusive about the indictment a couple of hours before.
Perhaps JC has bugged his office.What else do you think it might be based upon? Again, asking only for clarity, not for confrontation.
I agree he has a source. His source clearly seems to be HCW.
I just wonder why HCW has chosen JC as a spokesperson for his exclusives.
What if there is one theme that connects the three rapesYes, it would have to be, surely? I don't know the ins and outs of German law but I doubt it allows for 5 wholly separate accusations to be neatly packaged up into one charge/trial.
Our German (lawyer) friends on here will presumably put us straight on this.
I quoted above in another post from the Bild FF's comment about not having been given access to the statements of MS and HB. This would potentially show that the charges are not based on their statements, unless there is something else in the german legal system which would allow the exclusion of witness statements from the file that is given to the solicitor??What else do you think it might be based upon? Again, asking only for clarity, not for confrontation.
His source doesn't need to be HCW. but irrespective of who his source is in the BKA, sources are built by trust not fame. So we cannot know how this trust was built - but the important thing to acknowledge is that JC indeed has a good source in the BKA.I agree he has a source. His source clearly seems to be HCW.
I just wonder why HCW has chosen JC as a spokesperson for his exclusives.
"Just" raping and whipping.....No, that has to be a translation error. Perhaps Superdad can clarify.
Charge #1 dates the incident between december 28th of 2000 and 8th of april 2006.
Im curious, on what kind of evidence this indication is based on! Probably some kind of metadata?
April 2006 sounds like going to jail in portugal, but why such a huge timespan before 2006?
I'd say photographic evidence of MM and the wooden pole would convict.
I suspect something like this exists.
To my horror.
JMO
I won't, because you are on my ingo-list for a long time (as many others!!). I don't like your attitude in general. But no offence so far!What else do you think it might be based upon? Again, asking only for clarity, not for confrontation.
I agree he has a source. His source clearly seems to be HCW.
I just wonder why HCW has chosen JC as a spokesperson for his exclusives.
The BKA appeal included particular footage from his house, right...?!I'd say photographic evidence of MM and the wooden pole would convict.
I suspect something like this exists.
To my horror.
JMO
What else do you think it might be based upon? Again, asking only for clarity, not for confrontation.
I agree he has a source. His source clearly seems to be HCW.
I just wonder why HCW has chosen JC as a spokesperson for his exclusives.
Well, looks like he has been invited for interrogation before filing the charge maybe.What is not clear here is whether CB has been interrogated on these charges as part of the preliminary, pre charge investigation - maybe the witness statements are withheld until that happens, to prevent him preparing answers
I had some time out and wow I have missed a lot.