IF Mark Harrison is right that Madeleine's remains were thrown into the sea, Madeleine's remains will not be found.
How?
Throwing a body into the sea is often not that easy if you don’t want it to wash up on the beach
IF Mark Harrison is right that Madeleine's remains were thrown into the sea, Madeleine's remains will not be found.
How?
Throwing a body into the sea is often not that easy if you don’t want it to wash up on the beach
Please remove if not appropriate. LT’s son resembles this efit, imo.First of all, my involvement with the "woman in purple":
I was asked from the Express if I had knowledge of people related to Bulgaria in the PJ files. The journalists were saying that the "woman in purple" was related to Bulgaria. But I only was searching for a woman with links to Bulgaria.
I answered:
“I have been combing through all the police files trying to identify who the woman in purple could be. It has been widely reported that Yard officers are in Bulgaria. Examining all the known statements it seems highly likely the police are seeking the Ts as they are the only known people with a clear link to Bulgaria."
The rest of the press said that I had discovered the woman in purple! And then the press said otherwise
Original source: Scotland Yard hunts waitress believed to be the 'woman in purple'
Of course LT was not the woman in purple. I always think she may be JT, and later maybe NF. Only my opinions.
If taken out in a small boat a mile or so off shore a body could easily be disposed of
Why does it have to be in the night ? Why not in daytime, hire small boat, go on board with suitable body bag and come back with empty bag.Have you been at night in PdL beach? It is very very dark.
Why does it have to be in the night ? Why not in daytime, hire small boat, go on board with suitable body bag and come back with empty bag.
Why does it have to have been disposed of near PDL ?With a lot of people searching MM?
I wonder which color appears purple under sodium bichrome lights!
Please see The abduction of Madeleine McCann: Why can't Martin Smith, the star witness, recognize Chistian B?
The Smith efits were done 1y later! They do resemble CB but the height is off.I wonder which color appears purple under sodium bichrome lights!
Please see The abduction of Madeleine McCann: Why can't Martin Smith, the star witness, recognize Chistian B?
The Smith efits were done 1y later! They do resemble CB but the height is off.
I would have thought 9:50pm a better time (9:15pm) for the abductor - the group were settled in drinking & eating.
The abductor would have had to have been in the flat with GMc who would likely have smelled smoke.
Julian T held his daughter in the same way as Tannerman.
How?
Throwing a body into the sea is often not that easy if you don’t want it to wash up on the beach
I am currently of the opinion on the available information and statistical datasets that if death has occurred, that it is possible that Madeleine McCann’s body has been disposed into the sea at Praia da Luz. (See my second report entitled “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”).
(Mark Harrison)
Quite how that conclusion is supposed to tally with the content of Amaral's book, I have no idea. But that is for another discussion.
Mark Harrison based his conclusion on quite a detailed study of currents and tides and whatever else. I'll see if I can dig out the rest ....I agree it is possible. But not as easy as portrayed. If you just toss something in from the shore it may well not go far at all depending on tides and currents.
GMc had hay fever medication with him so may well have had a reduced sense of smell.The Smith efits were done 1y later! They do resemble CB but the height is off.
I would have thought 9:50pm a better time (9:15pm) for the abductor - the group were settled in drinking & eating.
The abductor would have had to have been in the flat with GMc who would likely have smelled smoke.
Julian T held his daughter in the same way as Tannerman.
I agree it is possible. But not as easy as portrayed. If you just toss something in from the shore it may well not go far at all depending on tides and currents.
Mark Harrison based his conclusion on quite a detailed study of currents and tides and whatever else. I'll see if I can dig out the rest ....
The Bulgarian link may have been the woman whose phone HB was using in Greece when he first made contact with SY in 2017.First of all, my involvement with the "woman in purple":
I was asked from the Express if I had knowledge of people related to Bulgaria in the PJ files. The journalists were saying that the "woman in purple" was related to Bulgaria. But I only was searching for a woman with links to Bulgaria.
I answered:
“I have been combing through all the police files trying to identify who the woman in purple could be. It has been widely reported that Yard officers are in Bulgaria. Examining all the known statements it seems highly likely the police are seeking the Ts as they are the only known people with a clear link to Bulgaria."
The rest of the press said that I had discovered the woman in purple! And then the press said otherwise
Original source: Scotland Yard hunts waitress believed to be the 'woman in purple'
Of course LT was not the woman in purple. I always think she may be JT, and later maybe NF. Only my opinions.
Homicide Disposal Datasets
A limited search has been conducted of datasets that contain body disposal
data in homicide cases (CATCHEM, SCAS, FBI). Although this search was
limited due to the time constraints placed on this reports delivery an inference
can be gained from both the data sets and the authors own case work
experience. I have also consulted with NPIA and FBI colleagues to benefit
from their experiences.
The conclusion inferred is that beach burial is extremely rare This should not
surprise us as to dig on a beach is a high risk activity requiring expending time
and energy when a more 'least effort" disposal is readily available, that is
directly into the sea. Of those limited cases that were found to be a beach
disposal the overwhelming majority were surface depositions with only one
recorded concealment using rocks on top of a 2 year old child (CATCHEM
Database)
Discussion
Where a homicide occurs and the sea is accessible and nearby then it would
become a natural disposal choice for an offender using the "least effort
principle. The beach itself would appear to merely be the platform to facilitate
this. When this is considered in relation to the beach at Praia Da Luz there is
a reinforcement of this view due to the severe limiting and inhibiting factors to
achieve a beach burial there. If a burial was achieved there is a significant
likelihood, based on the tidal coverage of the entire beach, that a burial would
be exposed and or taken into the sea. If a body entered the sea it could
remain close to the shore travelling in an eastward direction until it returned to
shore or became trapped in the sub surface rocks.
The optimum time window, on the night of disappearance, to dispose of a
body into the sea from the shore would have been between 2200hrs and
0200hrs. The optimum time to dispose of a body into the sea from the top of
the cliffs would have been between 0200hrs and 041 Shrs.
Due to the normal high occupancy tourist activity on the beach and in the sea
it could be considered a body would self expose and be detected.
In conclusion there is no intelligence spe?ic to this case or generic datasets
that support a scenario of beach burial. Additionally the digability study and
coastal dynamics of the Praia Da Luz beach further limit this as a viable
scenario. However should further assurance be required I would suggest a
limited inspection around the rock falls at the base of the cliffs' on the beach
and the waters around the rocky outcrop to the east of the beach.
Should the investigators wish to discuss and develop the issues raised in this
assessment I would be happy to do so.