Was it yourself who mentioned Dostoyevsky the other day? The original investigation does seem a little bit like one from one of his books. Good call whoever it was.
Here's where the misunderstandings arise though. Folks will think we're criticising the efforts that brought the other five cases to court, when we're not. It's perfectly possible for competent, and very competent, investigative work to have been carried out elsewhere simultaneously with the original investigation turning out to be a tunnel-visioned mess. Some of us thought that it likely was way back in 06/20 of course.