- Joined
- Jul 20, 2019
- Messages
- 592
- Reaction score
- 1,080
Finally! Believe he will start accumulating...
Finally! Believe he will start accumulating...
But it has similarities to the attack on Hazel Behan.Yet no convictions for abduction or murder, the offences he is allegedly guilty of in the MM case.
IMO, the DM rape offence - a break and enter attack in the victim’s home, has no similarities to the MM crime.
in what way? other than the same man is allegedly responsible for both cases?But it has similarities to the attack on Hazel Behan.
Home invasion, sexual assault ,masked, forensically aware ,torture and filmed off the top of my head.in what way? other than the same man is allegedly responsible for both cases?
sorry I didnt read it properly beforeHome invasion, sexual assault ,masked, forensically aware ,torture and filmed off the top of my head.
Similiarity that may went unnoticed bringing repeated "success". But it may now help on digging up and "validating" other cases, giving him misery.Home invasion, sexual assault ,masked, forensically aware ,torture and filmed off the top of my head.
Yes, the DM and HaB attacks appear very similar.But it has similarities to the attack on Hazel Behan.
They are relevant as they speak to the character and behaviour of the suspect- someone who thinks nothing of entering another’s property illegally to get what he wants including presumably sexual kicks and a thrill from exerting power and dominance over helpless individuals .Yes, the DM and HaB attacks appear very similar.
However, they are so very different from the MM case that they are hardly relevant IMO.
This forum is about MM.
But none of that happened in the MM case - she disappeared without a trace.They are relevant as they speak to the character and behaviour of the suspect- someone who thinks nothing of entering another’s property illegally to get what he wants including presumably sexual kicks and a thrill from exerting power and dominance over helpless individuals .
It will be more credible if reported by a real newspaper that doesn't have a history of running fictional and misleading stories.It has been a long time coming but it looks as if MM’s case will finally have its day in court.
CB and his legal teams will be tied up in other serious, sexually motivated court cases which are expected to start in February 2024 and are scheduled to run for over a month.
After that according to police sources the MM trial will follow ‘soon afterwards’. “It’s good news (finally) and we are working on the exact dates now,” a senior detective at the BKA, in Wiesbaden, revealed.
![]()
EXCLUSIVE: Trial date for Madeleine McCann suspect is finally set: Christian Brueckner, 46, faces lengthy jail term for 'violent sexual attacks on women and children' - Olive Press News Spain
MADELEINE McCann suspect Christian Brueckner will finally face a number of his alleged victims in court in February. The Olive Press can reveal awww.theolivepress.es
CB has not yet been processed for crimes against MM so enjoys the presumption of innocence regarding her.Yes, the DM and HaB attacks appear very similar.
However, they are so very different from the MM case that they are hardly relevant IMO.
This forum is about MM.
BIB - No, it's not; the question is: Why is he a suspect now?CB has not yet been processed for crimes against MM so enjoys the presumption of innocence regarding her.
That is not the situation regarding other sexually motivated crimes for which he has been found guilty. He is a paedophile with a very long and documented history of his perversions both on the web and on digital media.
CB is a proven sadistic abuser of women and children and a bit of poetic justice is that some of his fiendish crimes became known when he was under investigation for domestic abuse. This is a violent man where women are concerned.
Snip
CB assaulted the youngster in a public park before taking graphic photographs that were later discovered on his digital camera and laptop as police investigated him over a separate claim of domestic violence.
![]()
Christian Brueckner was jailed for abusing ex-girlfriend's daughter
The prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was jailed for sexually abusing the five-year-old daughter of a former girlfriend, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.www.dailymail.co.uk
CB is a burglar. Illegal furtive entry and exit is his stock in trade. CB is very familiar with the holiday accommodations one of which is where MM was staying. He knew the surrounding area and he had transport.
His rape victim's villa was only a ten minute walk from where MM slept on holiday.
Snip
The villa, called Casa Jacaranda, is just a ten-minute walk from the Ocean Village apartments where Maddie was sleeping in a ground floor apartment when she was snatched 13 years ago.
![]()
Luxury villa where new Madeleine McCann suspect raped a 72-year-old
EXCLUSIVE: Christian Brueckner broke into the secluded home two years before the three-year-old went missing from her family's apartment in the resort of Praia da Luz.www.dailymail.co.uk
The question is not why CB is a suspect in crimes against MM. It is why he wasn't a suspect much sooner in 2007?
Children don’t just disappear from their bedrooms withoit there being a reason. The investigators into Madeleine’s disappearance have substantial evidence that she was taken to be the ”play thing” of their main and only suspect. Hence it is relevant.But none of that happened in the MM case - she disappeared without a trace.
Any suggestion that there was a sexual motive for the crime against MM is unsubstantiated.
Really? Where do you get that from ?Children don’t just disappear from their bedrooms withoit there being a reason. The investigators into Madeleine’s disappearance have substantial evidence that she was taken to be the ”play thing” of their main and only suspect. Hence it is relevant.
Despite his loose lips and frequent unnecessary opinions, not even HCW has made claims similar to those made in the prior post from @Consider Dudley.Really? Where do you get that from ?
The press, interviews with HCW, etcReally? Where do you get that from ?