yes, I’m not sure why this article has caused particular indignation- it reveals nothing that wasn’t already mentioned in that Panorama documentary as far as I can see….?My understanding was that the Mail copied the story from the BBC news prior to Bilton's documentary in Panorama .
I am still mightily intrigued by the extraordinary incident when CB arrived mob handed to retrieve a freezer demanded by menace from the premises he had lived and worked in and been evicted from.yes, I’m not sure why this article has caused particular indignation- it reveals nothing that wasn’t already mentioned in that Panorama documentary as far as I can see….?
Just because it's said face to face doesn't make it true, Billy Clinton is testimony to that.I am still mightily intrigued by the extraordinary incident when CB arrived mob handed to retrieve a freezer demanded by menace from the premises he had lived and worked in and been evicted from.
As reported face to face in the BBC Panorama documentary
It could be that what was not mentioned is what they have.So that would suggest law enforement is the source.
I've often wondered if HCW does not have digital evidence, but rather someone claims to have seen evidence - as happened in the rape case
I am still mightily intrigued by the extraordinary incident when CB arrived mob handed to retrieve a freezer demanded by menace from the premises he had lived and worked in and been evicted from.
As reported face to face in the BBC Panorama documentar
IMO CB’s MO was to dig and bury things.Of course if Mark Harrison is right that Madeleine's remains were thrown into the sea, there will be no body to find.
And maybe all were drunk or just bragging or lying...and nothing can be proven as true. IMO that's a good thing BKA doesn't think like that.Just because it's said face to face doesn't make it true, Billy Clinton is testimony to that.
Agree. We have seen numerous of these types of headlines since the Germans went public. The tabloids appear to set up a mini-series of counter narratives after progress is announced or a bold statement is made.Must be slow on the news front
![]()
Police 'fear probe into Madeleine McCann suspect close to collapsing'
German police probing convicted paedophile Christian Brueckner (pictured) reportedly have until the new year to find a new lead before their investigation falls through.www.dailymail.co.uk
It's a rehash of a Sept just gone story, comes from the Sun originally or is picked up on the news wires by the Sun first, why though what's in it for the brit rags to keep it running.Agree. We have seen numerous of these types of headlines since the Germans went public. The tabloids appear to set up a mini-series of counter narratives after progress is announced or a bold statement is made.
He said they might have, it's a big leap to say he had them.Great point.
HCW said that they have evidence like photos, videos, online conversations & documents. He seemed to be talking plurally so I’m guessing they have 2 or more types of this evidence. I think online conversations is a given because we’ve seen the non-redacted version of the Skype chat, I assume there’s more. I think the concrete evidence is picture(s). My opinion
So that would suggest law enforement is the source.
I've often wondered if HCW does not have digital evidence, but rather someone claims to have seen evidence - as happened in the rape case
The libel courts can probably sort that one out if there is any quibble about veracity of on air statements by a known person not a "source" hiding behind anonymity and spouting rubbish.Just because it's said face to face doesn't make it true, Billy Clinton is testimony to that.
I politely disagree. The type of evidence they may have being the type of evidence the prosecutor says they may have is one of the tiniest leaps one could make. A big leap would be going from HCW’s comments to a freezer, calpol & a dog bark. My opinion.He said they might have, it's a big leap to say he had them.
If the things you've suggested are brought up it's by those trying to make mischief imo.I politely disagree. The type of evidence they may have being the type of evidence the prosecutor says they may have is one of the tiniest leaps one could make. A big leap would be going from HCW’s comments to a freezer, calpol & a dog bark. My opinion.
HCW saidI politely disagree. The type of evidence they may have being the type of evidence the prosecutor says they may have is one of the tiniest leaps one could make. A big leap would be going from HCW’s comments to a freezer, calpol & a dog bark. My opinion.
Please forgive me for my wry smile as I quote your source saying,Must be slow on the news front
![]()
Police 'fear probe into Madeleine McCann suspect close to collapsing'
German police probing convicted paedophile Christian Brueckner (pictured) reportedly have until the new year to find a new lead before their investigation falls through.www.dailymail.co.uk
It is not my source, it is a readily available article.Please forgive me for my wry smile as I quote your source saying,