Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect, #40

[Mex]

It seems HCW is far less interested in finding the user of the phone than he was when they first appealed. When the reports in 2020 surfaced many prompted the message that finding the caller was the key to this case & the only way to get it to a charging threshold. However, that no longer appears to be the case. Tourists pictures & videos are probably the most affective way of putting him near the OC that afternoon/evening. Judging by his rhetoric I think they’ve probably got that evidence now. My opinion.

I agree with your synopsis.
TBH until the call
was mentioned in the documentary, I thought it had been resolved and they knew the caller's identity.

Seems not; and they don't seem to be too disturbed about it.

Probably they would still like to know but the investigation might have taken a different turn making it less important.
My opinion

 

[enquirer6]

<modsnip: quoted post was removed> I really don't understand where Herr Fulscher is coming from in complaining that anything Herr Wolters says might prejudice his client's right to a fair trial

 

[Anxala]

It would be understandable once it has gone to court, even for their £13 million OG never divulged

Yes, exactly, gone to trial and convicted. That's when the story can effectively be told, when the result is in. To continue to participate in these type of clickbait docs is bizarre. The doc makers know the cut of his jib by now, that he's not going to reveal anything that takes the case one step forward, so why even bother? He's the only one in the know and he knows he's the only one in the know. To participate knowing that he's not going to deliver is borderline provocative. He seems very fond of the limelight. Does he get paid for his appearances, I wonder? Most people who participate in docs recieve a fee in some form or another.

I can see him in years time, the MM case still at a standstill, turning up on 'I'm a Celebrity', the words 'If you knew what I know' echoing exhaustively through the jungle.

Ok, that's a joke. Kind of.

 

[Mex]

Yes, exactly, gone to trial and convicted. That's when the story can effectively be told, when the result is in. To continue to participate in these type of clickbait docs is bizarre. The doc makers know the cut of his jib by now, that he's not going to reveal anything that takes the case one step forward, so why even bother? He's the only one in the know and he knows he's the only one in the know. It's borderline provocative. Does he get paid for his appearances, I wonder? Most people who participate in docs recieve a fee in some form or another. He seems very fond of the limelight.

I can see him in years time, the MM case still at a standstill, turning up on 'I'm a Celebrity', the words 'If you knew what I know' echoing through the jungle.

Ok, that's a joke. Kind of.

I'm struggling with to whom you are referring. Who is it?

 

[RichardKimble]

Unamed source ,seems to be enough to go around.

Madeleine McCann suspect may have hid photos of toddler, police say

The prime suspect in the case of missing Madeleine McCann may have taken photos of the missing toddler and buried them in an underground hideaway, police believe.

www.dailymail.co.uk

An unnamed source told The Sun: '[Authorities investigating] now know Christian B buried data carriers like hard drives and USB sticks at any of the places where he's stayed so that was their real hope at the lake.'

'They really thought they might find pictures there, but they are not giving up hope. They believe he made duplicates because he loved to keep them like trophies.'

 

[onemoremiletogo]

Agree. When HCW talked about the potential of a CB alibi he was certain there wouldn’t be one. That can only mean they have evidence that’s make them certain CB is responsible. Pen drives at the dam seems a tad like he’s just anticipating & squashing the defences claim they were looking for a body. It’s interesting that they’re still going through whatever they found at the dam. Probably would have done so by now if it were pen drives. My opinion.

HCW said at one point, that he has ‘an answer’ to CB being in 5a but it would bring ‘a thousand more questions. Lately I’ve wondered what that ‘answer’ (of CB being in 5a) could be.

Well, it maybe any comment CB might have mentioned related to 5A that they found in incriminating chats?! Or from any "criminal" informant?!
Something only the abductor would know...

 

[mrjitty]

Unamed source ,seems to be enough to go around.

Madeleine McCann suspect may have hid photos of toddler, police say

The prime suspect in the case of missing Madeleine McCann may have taken photos of the missing toddler and buried them in an underground hideaway, police believe.

www.dailymail.co.uk

An unnamed source told The Sun: '[Authorities investigating] now know Christian B buried data carriers like hard drives and USB sticks at any of the places where he's stayed so that was their real hope at the lake.'

'They really thought they might find pictures there, but they are not giving up hope. They believe he made duplicates because he loved to keep them like trophies.'

I guess i am going to give up commenting how wildly irresponsible this kind of "reporting" is.

 

[frank-cole]

Well, it maybe any comment CB might have mentioned related to 5A that they found in incriminating chats?! Or from any "criminal" informant?!
Something only the abductor would know...

Good point. They’ll most likely have something evidential linking CB with 5a. If they didn’t HCW wouldn’t have said anything IMO.

CB doesn’t appear like the sort of criminal that keeps things private. I recon his words may be part of his undoing. He’s probably written everything about the crime, other than MM’s name.

I highly doubt the prosecution will need to put CB in 5a. They’ll just need him in the area. My opinion.

 

[enquirer6]

Good point. They’ll most likely have something evidential linking CB with 5a. If they didn’t HCW wouldn’t have said anything IMO.

CB doesn’t appear like the sort of criminal that keeps things private. I recon his words may be part of his undoing. He’s probably written everything about the crime, other than MM’s name.

I highly doubt the prosecution will need to put CB in 5a. They’ll just need him in the area. My opinion.

Did not the German criminal profiler Herr Hoffman say they had some sort of record of Brueckner wanting to do unspeakable things to a little girl at some point?

 

[Lilly b]

Good point. They’ll most likely have something evidential linking CB with 5a. If they didn’t HCW wouldn’t have said anything IMO.

CB doesn’t appear like the sort of criminal that keeps things private. I recon his words may be part of his undoing. He’s probably written everything about the crime, other than MM’s name.

I highly doubt the prosecution will need to put CB in 5a. They’ll just need him in the area. My opinion.

And, many things weren't very private, of the people that new him have said many things like, he was always on the dark web, he filmed himself and others kept things that could be found,eg passports, watches mobile phones ,
Pictures and videos, Internet chats, I suppose the list goes on

 

[enquirer6]

I think, if they can prove that Brueckner was in the proximity of the crime at the time the crime was committed and they can (already have!) prove(d) that Brueckner perfectly matches the profile of someone capable of what befell Madeleine,, then you have to work out the statistics of more than one person, capable of what Brueckner is capable of, being at the 'right' place at the 'right' time, and the other one being the culprit of crimes against Madeleine.

Vanishingly remote, I would say.

 

[Anxala]

I guess i am going to give up commenting how wildly irresponsible this kind of "reporting" is.

'May have'. 'Is alleged to have'. 'Could have'.

How many times over the last 3 years have we read this type of pointless, valueless junk?

Same old same old sensational click-baiting, agenda-laden nonsense in the absence of facts.

 

[CousinVinny]

I think, if they can prove that Brueckner was in the proximity of the crime at the time the crime was committed and they can (already have!) prove(d) that Brueckner was in the vicinity of the crime at the time the crime was committed, then you have to work out the statistics of more than one person, capable of what Brueckner is capable of, being at the 'right' place at the 'right' time, and the other one being the culprit of crimes against Madeleine.

Vanishingly remote, I would say.

The judge would still need some direct evidence though. From what's been said, I reckon Bruekner must have given an account somewhere of what he did and that's why the police are so sure they know what happened.

 

[frank-cole]

And, many things weren't very private, of the people that new him have said many things like, he was always on the dark web, he filmed himself and others kept things that could be found,eg passports, watches mobile phones ,
Pictures and videos, Internet chats, I suppose the list goes on

Great point.
HCW said that they have evidence like photos, videos, online conversations & documents. He seemed to be talking plurally so I’m guessing they have 2 or more types of this evidence. I think online conversations is a given because we’ve seen the non-redacted version of the Skype chat, I assume there’s more. I think the concrete evidence is picture(s). My opinion

 

[frank-cole]

<modsnip: quoted post was removed>
When the open-source facts about CB are stacked against things like Calpol overdose, the Lisbon treaty & hidden freezers it’s not a stretch to see why the PJ are solely investigating CB & felt compelled to apologise to the McCann’s. I think the lack of substance to the alt-theory doesn’t afford any foundation for a defence counter argument & if used would depreciate the credibility of the defences case. Away from the turbulence of the debate, it’s been interesting to see worst practice & best practice investigations. It’s just unfortunate that the latter came 10 years after the former.

 

[enquirer6]

Of course if Mark Harrison is right that Madeleine's remains were thrown into the sea, there will be no body to find.

 

[onemoremiletogo]

And, many things weren't very private, of the people that new him have said many things like, he was always on the dark web, he filmed himself and others kept things that could be found,eg passports, watches mobile phones ,
Pictures and videos, Internet chats, I suppose the list goes on

Apart from chat messages and autobiographic texts corroborated by separate testimonies, which seems more obvious they have, it may also have existed a photo seen, confirmed/shared by "a client" then removed?! More unlikely?!

 

[enquirer6]

We can say, certainly, that should it be that someone not Brueckner took Madeleine, Brueckner would have regarded that as a 'missed opportunity'.

 

[CousinVinny]

We can say, certainly, that should it be that someone not Brueckner took Madeleine, Brueckner would have regarded that as a 'missed opportunity'.

I reckon he documented he took her

 

[RichardKimble]

The judge would still need some direct evidence though. From what's been said, I reckon Bruekner must have given an account somewhere of what he did and that's why the police are so sure they know what happened.

So sure, but let's not have a trial to get in the way.