Malaysia airlines plane may have crashed 239 people on board #23

[SouthAussie]

Only registered with an ABN in Feb 2013 .. and initially with no GST registration (which means anticipated earnings of under $75,000 p/yr), although they changed that a few months later.

http://abr.business.gov.au/SearchByAbnHistory.aspx?abn=77161803201

 

[Intermezzo]

In regards to the statements by GeoResonance
They say they found the wreckage of a plane or something like it in the Bay of Bengal..


Satellite hand shakes say the plane flew for 7-8 hours, right?

Is this area within the satellite or handshake ARC?

KL, Malaysia to Calcutta, India is, according to the site I visited, a 4 hour flight.
KL, Malaysia to to Chennai, India is also about a 4 hour flight...
And that is if this plane even traveled to land

If the investigation team has said the plane flew until it ran out of fuel...what did it do in the Bay of Bengal...fly around in circles until it ran out of fuel and went into the ocean

Also...no debris spotted or come ashore in any country in that area?

I agree with those here that are Skeptical

This company is getting a lot of attention..and if it turns out to be nothing.. they still got a lot of attention

:twocents:

 

[LambChop]

Maybe what they are seeing is a sub. Wouldn't that be something?

 

[SouthAussie]

In regards to the statements by GeoResonance
They say they found the wreckage of a plane or something like it in the Bay of Bengal..

Satellite hand shakes say the plane flew for 7-8 hours, right?

Is this area within the satellite or handshake ARC?

KL, Malaysia to Calcutta, India is, according to the site I visited, a 4 hour flight.
KL, Malaysia to to Chennai, India is also about a 4 hour flight...
And that is if this plane even traveled to land

If the investigation team has said the plane flew until it ran out of fuel...what did it do in the Bay of Bengal...fly around in circles until it ran out of fuel and went into the ocean

Also...no debris spotted or come ashore in any country in that area?

According to lat/long given, the area is off the north east coast of Myanmar (Burma) - so not on the northern arc.

I wonder what GeoResonance saw in the official search area off Western Australia during their scanning of the oceans ... if they scanned that area.

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/m...h-mh370-kin-demand-fresh-check-on-afghanistan

 

[Intermezzo]

According to lat/long given, the area is off the north east coast of Myanmar (Burma) - so not on the northern arc.

I wonder what GeoResonance saw in the official search area off Western Australia during their scanning of the oceans ... if they scanned that area.

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/m...h-mh370-kin-demand-fresh-check-on-afghanistan

Thank You :seeya:

flight time from KL to coastal areas of Bangladesh( such as Dhaka) which is further, north or east of Myanmar is also less than a 4 hour flight...

I just noticed the part about this location NOT being in the Northern Arc

 

[SouthAussie]

Malaysian Defence Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said China and Australia were aware of the announcement.

“Malaysia is working with its international partners to assess the credibility of this information,” a statement from his office said.

“Need more corroboration n verification b4 we deploy assets,” Mr Hussein later tweeted.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...a-airlines-mh370/story-fnizu68q-1226900328886

 

[ilovepierre]

I don't think this GeoResonance is that credible of a company...IMO.
The search has been going on since March, and some small satellite company has spotted images that high tech spy satellites couldn't? :waitasec:

Also Immersat has traced the plane's pings to two different arcs, and the Bay of Bengal is not part of that arc. I know Immersat determined the satellite pings with never before used technology, but I still think that the pings and the arcs are as accurate as they can be.

All this is JMO.

 

[SouthAussie]

But the Joint Agency Coordination Centre, which is coordinating the multinational search for the missing Malaysia Airlines plane, has dismissed GeoResonance's claims.

"The Australian-led search is relying on information from satellite and other data to determine the missing aircraft's location," the JACC said in a statement.

"The location specified by the GeoResonance report is not within the search arc derived from this data. The joint international team is satisfied that the final resting place of the missing aircraft is in the southerly portion of the search arc."

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national...ralian-firm-ignored-over-mh370-wreckage-claim

 

[Hatfield]

GeoResonance Press Release

The approximate location was passed onto Malaysian Airlines and the Malaysian and Chinese Embassies in Canberra, Australia, on March 31, 2014. It was well before the black box batteries had expired. These details were also passed onto the Australian authorities (JACC) in Perth on April 4, 2014. A more detailed study was completed in early April. The final 23 page report including the precise location of the wreckage was passed onto Malaysian Airlines, Malaysian High Commission in Canberra, Chinese Embassy in Canberra, and the Australian authorities (JACC) on April 15, 2014.

http://www.airtrafficmanagement.net/2014/04/georesonance-press-release/

CARL DORSCH

http://www.tellusresources.com.au/directors-officeholders

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/busin...f-cooper-licence/story-fni6uma6-1226736576206

If they gave a precise GPS coordinates of their supposed "find" I still say send 1 boat with good sonar to check it out. It is costing them more money considering it than to just go check it out to see if a plane shows up on a sonar detector.

Compared to all the money spent so far down South with absolutely ZILCH to show for it, spending a very tiny fraction of that money to send 1 boat to either debunk it or not is well worth it.

But no, they will spend tons of money just meeting and talking about and never go check it out anyway.

The same said for the pilot that had a "find". Just go check it out for goodness sakes. Then consider it debunked or not. That is how you create a list and can check things on or off the list. By not checking any of these reports out, they are doing NOTHING.

 

[Amee]

Todays Search and Rescue

Joint Agency Coordination Centre

Media Release
30 April 2014—am

The search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 is commencing a new phase and will transition over the coming weeks to an intensified undersea search.

In the meantime Bluefin-21, which has completed its search of the 314 square kilometre area around the detections made by the Towed Pinger Locator, will continue to search adjacent areas.

Mission 17 will commence when weather conditions improve allowing Bluefin-21 to be safely launched from Australian Defence Vessel Ocean Shield.

Ocean Shield will remain on station supporting Bluefin-21 search activity.

Over the coming days the vessels that remain on standby for the search will transition to and from the search area.

A Royal Australian Air Force AP-3C Orion also remains on standby in Perth.

Other vessels and aircraft that have been engaged in the surface and aerial search will now transition to their respective national tasking in the coming days.

Any further information will be made public if, and when, it becomes available.

http://www.jacc.gov.au/media/releases/2014/april/mr041.aspx

 

[Amee]

"It is imperative for the government to form this independent team of investigators which is not only competent and transparent but also highly credible."

The investigation body, which has already started work, has accredited representatives from the US National Transportation Safety Board, Britain's Air Accidents Investigation Branch and China's Aircraft Accident Investigation Department among other agencies.


Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/Officials-di...7/articleID/342088/Default.aspx#ixzz30Kaz88Nr

 

[SouthAussie]

If they gave a precise GPS coordinates of their supposed "find" I still say send 1 boat with good sonar to check it out. It is costing them more money considering it than to just go check it out to see if a plane shows up on a sonar detector.

Compared to all the money spent so far down South with absolutely ZILCH to show for it, spending a very tiny fraction of that money to send 1 boat to either debunk it or not is well worth it.

But no, they will spend tons of money just meeting and talking about and never go check it out anyway.

The same said for the pilot that had a "find". Just go check it out for goodness sakes. Then consider it debunked or not. That is how you create a list and can check things on or off the list. By not checking any of these reports out, they are doing NOTHING.

According to a CNN article, GeoResonance said that their data is from an area 120 miles south of Bangladesh.

I think that may place it in Bangladesh waters.

http://www.bangladeshchronicle.net/index.php/2014/02/indo-bangla-maritime-bd-expects-25000sqkm/

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/29/world/asia/malaysia-plane-georesonance/

 

[Amee]

India, Bangladesh and other countries to the north have said they never detected the plane in their airspace.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...a-airlines-mh370/story-fnizu68q-1226900328886

 

[ElleElle]

I don't think this GeoResonance is that credible of a company...IMO.
The search has been going on since March, and some small satellite company has spotted images that high tech spy satellites couldn't? :waitasec:

Also Immersat has traced the plane's pings to two different arcs, and the Bay of Bengal is not part of that arc. I know Immersat determined the satellite pings with never before used technology, but I still think that the pings and the arcs are as accurate as they can be.

All this is JMO.

Ok, speaking from experience, my work consists of working in a QA lab, and I personally do not put it past these little outfits.

International radar is iffy because countries are reluctant to share satt and radar data.

JMO.

 

[Hatfield]

According to a CNN article, GeoResonance said that their data is from an area 120 miles south of Bangladesh.

I think that may place it in Bangladesh waters.

http://www.bangladeshchronicle.net/index.php/2014/02/indo-bangla-maritime-bd-expects-25000sqkm/

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/29/world/asia/malaysia-plane-georesonance/

I just heard on CNN from the CEO of the company (David Pope?) and he said exactly what I had said. He said it would be relatively cheap just to send a ship with good sonar to go "have a look".

There is absolutely no harm in checking out his information. It would be a real cheap exercise to get 1 ship with good sonar to check it out. The depths are nowhere near the depths south and good sonar is all you need which most ships already have.

The guy sounded very credible and it sounded like they spent lots of time and effort analyzing the data and producing their final detailed report.

A few CNN people are agreeing they should check it out. Especially since the southern searchers are producing nothing to date.

 

[Hatfield]

Ok, speaking from experience, my work consists of working in a QA lab, and I personally do not put it past these little outfits.

International radar is iffy because countries are reluctant to share satt and radar data.

JMO.

I agree Elle.

I think when they do find this plane it will be from something just like this small company or from some random person on a beach finding debri washed up.

 

[Isabelle]

If officials ignore the possibility that the plane could be in much more northern waters, then I think Australian radar has had information that they prefer not to release.

 

[Amee]

Inmarsat, the company whose satellite had the last known contact with MH370, remains "very confident" in its analysis that the plane ended up in the southern Indian Ocean, a source close to the MH370 investigation told CNN.

The Inmarsat analysis is "based on testable physics and mathematics," the source said, and has been reviewed by U.S., British and Malaysian authorities as well as an independent satellite company.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/29/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

 

[Amee]

The company has surveyed over 2,000,000 square kilometres of the possible crash zone, using images obtained from satellites and aircraft.

Scientists focused their efforts north of the flight’s last known location, using over 20 technologies to analyse the data including a nuclear reactor.

http://bdnews24.com/world/2014/04/28/missing-plane-wreckage-found-in-bay-of-bengal

 

[1&2&3]

That's assuming Boeing was notified very early on that the plane was missing and was asked to do something by Malaysia Gov't...I don't think Boeing could just override systems without the authority of the Gov't

IIRC,i it wasn't reported publicly until the morning...after 6am I think when it did not Arrive as scheduled in China, that MH370 was missing and had been for hours

If this is possible for Boeing to override systems, and Malaysia did not immediately report the plane missing, then this would be a huge reason for the government to have come across as "hiding" something as many of us have suspected. The Malaysian government knew they had a terrible liability on their hands, and were working on a solution before announcing the missing plane. But why would they not ask Boeing for help?

My opinion only.