Based on China's satellite images?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The reporter asked him if they were being sent to the area were the China sat images show objects.
Based on China's satellite images?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No no, oil rig letter was legit.
Bob Woodruff ‏@BobWoodruff 11h
.@ABC spoke with Richard Beaton w/Japanese Idemitsu Oil & Gas Co who hired Songa Mercur to drill & confirms email of Michael Mckay is real
https://twitter.com/BobWoodruff
Bob Woodruff Verified account
@BobWoodruff
Correspondent, Anchor for @ABC News. Co-founder Bob Woodruff Foundation
New York, New York
CNN keeps talking about the effects of a fire in the cockpit. Wonder why?
Bob Woodruff ‏@BobWoodruff 2m
Many experts think the image is too large for the plane & some wonder why the image is so blurry @ABC pic.twitter.com/TrvZzNBhsw
https://twitter.com/BobWoodruff
Yes, popiscle! Crazy the NZ rigger was credible after all. You never know though. I was on the :fence: about it, until they actually could take his claim seriously, and then search that area. :seeya:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php
?p=10326803&postcount=834
I am wondering about the supposed NZ oil rigger who sent the letter after witnessing what he thought could be the plane...
Could his employer have announced he didn't have an employee by that name due to:
-Unwanted publicity the notoriety would possibly bring? (IOW... A need for privacy?)
-Could some government officials have told him to make this announcement so,as,to keep the information regarding the plane hidden longer?
-the rigger may have been employed under a nickname? (Name confusion)
Or...???
I know I am stretching here...,but still just trying to make sense of something in this case...
:waitasec:
This all still seems so odd. If that was the original search area why wasn't it seen floating there ?
Forgive the autocorrect. Tapatalk has a mind of its own.![]()
IHAVENOCLUE;10327108]And what are these large pieces of debris in the ocean?
:waitasec:
There is still debris from Typhoon Haiyan which occurred in November, 2013.
http://www.hawaii.edu/news/article.php?aId=6154
Also giant patches of debris in various locations.
http://ocean.si.edu/ocean-news/ocean-trash-plaguing-our-sea
Also information on currents in the area:
http://swfsc.noaa.gov/publications/CR/1973/7302.PDF
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, popiscle! Crazy the NZ rigger was credible after all. You never know though. I was on the :fence: about it, until they actually could take his claim seriously, and then search that area. :seeya:
IMO, these are not the same images, or shall I say, they are not at the same resolution, as those that the Chinese government viewed. I'm thinking this is the real deal here and they waited to make sure before notifying/releasing these images. I don't believe they want to show us that they have the capability to see these same images at much higher resolution, etc..They blurred them on purpose. IMO...All the world is watching...
Hi everyone, joining.
First timer on Websleuths.com so sorry if formatting got mixed up or anything. Hopefully I can share something useful here. Ok lets get down to business.
This all still seems so odd. If that was the original search area why wasn't it seen floating there ?
Forgive the autocorrect. Tapatalk has a mind of its own.![]()
I am wondering about the supposed NZ oil rigger who sent the letter after witnessing what he thought could be the plane...
Could his employer have announced he didn't have an employee by that name due to:
-Unwanted publicity the notoriety would possibly bring? (IOW... A need for privacy?)
-Could some government officials have told him to make this announcement so,as,to keep the information regarding the plane hidden longer?
-the rigger may have been employed under a nickname? (Name confusion)
Or...???
I know I am stretching here...,but still just trying to make sense of something in this case...
:waitasec: