Thanks Ruthbullock!It was Noras headteacher today, not as long a session as usual and well worth listening to. It goes into quite a lot of detail about NQs abilities and progress made. No massive surprises, but it was more balanced and informative IMO. They will be back on Monday to discuss her EHCPs. For anyone not familiar with an EHCP, it is a legal document called an education and health care plan and is produced annually by various people like educational psychologists, speech and language therapists, teachers and parents to identify progress in areas such as communication, physical and create new learning targets. It is then sent to a team at the local council offices who check it and keep a record of it. An example on my daughters for example was to walk up stairs independently whilst holding a rail, and to write a simple sentence. SEN jungle is a website that explains all about the process for anyone who wants to understand the document and it’s purpose before Monday.
The headmaster has actually confirmed everything the parents have said up to now:
00:00-01.00
- Nora's school has classrooms of 10-12 students
- ages from 11 upwards
- Mr. Michael knows N personally since he has taught her occasionally when a teacher was absent
- School for moderate learning difficulties
- 2015 N enrolled to school
- Condition N: significant learning difficulties and physical disability
- Intellect: could read as a 6 year old when 11 years old. Math ability under the age of 5.
Recall sentences the ability of child of about 5 years old
- In 4 years time her reading has been increased from the level of a 6 year old to that of a 7 year old
- Nora made limited progress in 4 years time
- Very poor balance, core strength, posture. She did not dare to run, she was fearful
- Significant speech and language delay: of a 7 year old at the age of 15
- Hearing loss in her right ear
- Coordination and motoric skills: significate difficulty with fine and with gross motor skills
- Social skills: lacked confidence, was quiet, had trouble expressing her feelings. Would smile anyway, looked more cheerful when at times she wasn’t
- She was aware of how people should treat each other
- Relationship with other kids: well behaved, had a good group of friends, she talked to them, she empathised with other kids
- School compound had no gardens, just a paved playground. It is confined, to not let other people in, to keep strangers out, not so much because the school is afraid the children would leave the premises
- At school trips, N would never wander off, had no confidence to walk off by herself
- Al a school trip there were 40 children and 15 staff, two nights of camping. N coped well. She did need assistance to do the walks in the country
- 43:50; document issued by the school demonstrating that N had strong physical limitations. She had weak core muscles.
- 50:00; speech and language report, drawn up by a specialist of the school who followed Nora since her enrolment: N had a reduced vocabulary, retaining info that she had learned, how no full knowledge of how and when questions. What, where and who, she would be able to comprehend. Was very easily distracted by noise.
- For every evening since N frequented her school, she would wait for the taxi to come and collect her to take her home, Nora would look out of the window and when she would see the taxi arrive and pull over, she would always first look at the teacher and wait to be told to go to the taxi. She wouldn’t take that decision herself. Even for that short distance to reach the taxi.
- Nora was not able to process large chunks of information. She would have to receive one part at a time (go upstairs + fetch the ..+ bring it down + give it to x)