Did the officer not wear a video cam?
Knowing this officer was to testify in a federal case the next day, he should have been given an assignment in house or in a safe area to protect him. Why would his supervisor keep him in the dangerous district figuring people were out to get him before he testified?
And his partner took cover across the street? What did he do watch the bad guy fight the officer, take his gun, shoot him, run off .....and the partner did what? Nothing, just call 911. He sure proved to be the worst of any partners one could have!
Also, why the change of partners on this particular day? It all sounds like in-house corruption to me! JMO.
The first article's title is misleading. They have found nothing to suggest this was a suicide.
Not to get o/t or go political but it could also be that a systemic problem with police and the black community brought on by many many decades of harrasment and mass incarceration without justice have made that community understandably mistrustful of LE and their motives. Particularly in this current political climate. Particularly in Baltimore.
Just offering an alternative way to view....
Back on point to the victim here...the deceased officer. My deepest sympathies to his family and friends.
MOO
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Moments before his death, surveillance cameras showed, Suiter had paced back and forth on the street. Then he darted out of view and into the lot where three shots rang out.
This and other previously undisclosed evidence, described by sources to The Baltimore Sun, lies behind contradictory theories within the police department about Suiter’s still unsolved killing.
Some say the evidence — including the location of the gun, the pacing as though preparing himself — suggests Suiter could have committed suicide staged to look like a murder.
In this view, dirt found on Suiter’s clothing, an unintelligible transmission over his radio, and the two other shots from his gun all support the theory that he struggled with an assailant who has eluded detection. Police have said Suiter was killed with his own gun, though the shooting could have happened during such a struggle.
“The realistic version of this is that there are two things that are possible: suicide and murder,” one source said. “I could convince anybody why it’s a murder, and I could convince anybody why it’s a suicide.”
The Sun has also learned that before Davis sent the letter to FBI director Christopher Wray asking the agency to take over the investigation, the head of the Baltimore field office of the FBI, Gordon Johnson, told him the FBI had no interest in taking over the case.
FBI Assistant Director Stephen E. Richardson rejected Davis’ request on behalf of Wray and the FBI in late December, saying the agency had no evidence to suggest Suiter’s death was “directly connected” to the corruption probe or any other federal case.
Police haven’t publicly discussed the Suiter case since.
Baltimore Police Commissioner Darryl De Sousa on Thursday told the panel created to review the investigation of Det. Sean Suiter’s killing to “go where the evidence leads you,” before the group was scheduled to spend hours discussing the unsolved case in private.
“We are not going to reinvestigate a homicide,” but assess the police work that’s been done, said James “Chips” Stewart, one of the co-chairs of the Independent Review Board.
The board is expected to issue a comprehensive report of its “assessment of the facts and circumstances, and conclusion and findings of this tragic act,” to the police commissioner, Stewart said.
The review is expected to take 90 to 180 days, and police spokesman T.J. Smith said De Sousa intends to make the report public.
Can you please elaborate as I can not access the article from the UKI-Team source: Board concludes Suiter took his own life with his service weapon
I-Team source: Board concludes Suiter took his own life with his service weapon
Can you please elaborate as I can not access the article from the UK
Thanks so much
I’m still unconvinced that he took his own life - too convenient for my liking... The day before he was due to testify after speaking out and living and working with that decision to do the right thing for so long...... Then right before he is to testify??? MOO
That's the issue. Most likely was afraid what the reaction would be after his testimony. He was due to testify about the actions of other officers on the Gun Recovery Unit. He knew key information about their crooked actions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.