- Joined
- Dec 7, 2019
- Messages
- 5,196
- Reaction score
- 19,529
The Doe Network page on this unidentified man was last updated in 2018, and the only new info that appears to have been added was that he was circumcised.
Well if you're trying to compare to a MP who happens to be uncircumcised, it allows you to easily rule him out.Why did they add this information? I mean wasnt he born in a decade where most boys born in the US were cc'd at birth?
So why is that a distinctive feature then?
Why did they add this information? I mean wasnt he born in a decade where most boys born in the US were cc'd at birth?
So why is that a distinctive feature then?
It really is sad - he should've been IDed long ago! There is a photo of him, his DNA, and many other tidbits... someone has to know this man!In this day and age, hard to believe that they have not connected this poor soul to his family by now. The capability surely exists, but there does not seem to be any will to make it happen from LE. Just seems like he's been forgotten. They have his dna, and that is ultimately what is going to solve this mystery. Millions of people have taken dna tests over the past few years, and somewhere out there is a sibling, a cousin, niece, nephew... It's a matter of a dna expert / forensic genealogist taking on this case to do the work and make the connection.
It really is sad - he should've been IDed long ago! There is a photo of him, his DNA, and many other tidbits... someone has to know this man!
Bumping this thread up.Shocked to see he didn't have a reconstruction, so I made one. He looked much younger once I cleaned up his hair.
View attachment 304354
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.