- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,753
- Reaction score
- 152,549
I wondered the same yesterday when I saw it. Maybe a memorial, for her kids and extended family?Why?
I wondered the same yesterday when I saw it. Maybe a memorial, for her kids and extended family?Why?
Thanks for checking the scanner!The delay is making me hopeful things are happening... I'm really hoping this isn't a case of them having DNA, running it through CODIS, and getting hits that also haven't been IDed... Combine that with a sketch and hope for the best.
In other news, nothing fun on the police scanner, although I didn't have high hopes that there would be on the public channel.
LOL, in my mind I said "sore as"
"a leading law firm dedicated to providing exceptional legal representation to clients facing complex and challenging legal situations"
What legal situations is the family facing? This feels sort of apropos of not very much, IMO.
I noticed one of her Facebooks ended in 2018. The other Facebook appears to have been started up in 2019 and continued to present. Both are up now and easily searched.Rachel’s original FB re-appeared yesterday.
Maybe navigating the court system for custody of Rachel’s minor children?
The one started in 2019 was her most current one and was the one that was temporarily taken down.I noticed one of her Facebooks ended in 2018. The other Facebook appears to have been started up in 2019 and continued to present. Both are up now and easily searched.
I don't know which one was temporarily taken down.
JMO
Can the family fight for joint custody with grandparents or something of the like so that the children can stay together? My understanding is all of the children are currently in the care of their respective fathers, so I can't imagine being torn apart from your siblings because of this, when they likely need each other more than ever.AFAIK all fathers are alive. As far as visitation, not getting cut off from the kids, that issue is not ripe for adjudication yet imo since they haven't yet been denied access to the kids. The immediate aftermath here wouldn't be enough I don't think. However, this calculus changes completely if one of them is named a suspect.
All jmo and speculation.
Rachel’s original FB re-appeared yesterday.
Can the family fight for joint custody with grandparents or something of the like so that the children can stay together? My understanding is all of the children are currently in the care of their respective fathers, so I can't imagine being torn apart from your siblings because of this, when they likely need each other more than ever.
Perhaps media, youtubers, etc are contacting them and they would prefer all of that be handled by someone else.I don't see how they can take partial custody away from the fathers unless maybe one of them ends up being a suspect in this case. I would hope the family would want the kids to see each other but who knows what the relationships are like between these men. The grandparents would have rights moo, but there's no indication that they've been denied any access yet.
Like you, I have no idea why they retained this firm since the reason wasn't disclosed to us and aside from being a spokesperson I can't imagine what their legal fight is. I don't think they retained them to deal with custody or visitation, at least not yet for the reasons above. And, it could be that the firm solicited them - to get the exposure.
MOO
This is what I believe to be the case. One source to contact and then the firm navigates what is released and not released, interviews, etc...Perhaps media, youtubers, etc are contacting them and they would prefer all of that be handled by someone else.
jmo
It will be on the Harford County Sheriff Facebook page. Sounds like we might be getting either suspect description or an announcement of an arrest.Does anyone have a link? tia
To the presser? It should be on the Harford County Police Facebook, I will look for a link.Does anyone have a link? tia
I saw this link upthreadDoes anyone have a link? tia