eyes4crime
Go Chicago Bears!
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 4,852
- Reaction score
- 45
Who is saying anything about not holding the predator responsible? Is their some rule that says only on person per crime should be held responsible? Caretakers should definitely do some time when they fail to protect their kids.
Knowingly exposing your child to a child predator is the worst crime there is. IMO. Read through the threads here. The majority of crimes against children are caused by women who know their men are scum.
Seems to me the majority of crimes against children have been committed by child predators who are manipulative, cunning, grooms quickly, have antennae for vulnerable children, pocess a personality that women are attracted to, and zeros in on the most vulnerable of both, child and woman, that he can find.
I never once said there is only one person at fault for a child murder, and if you read my comment you would see I understand there are people who blame both and think both should be punished.
My personal opinion is that the child predator loves the people who want to blame caretakers - even if they blame them just a little bit, that lets them off the hook for taking ALL the responsibility for the murderous crime THEY commit. And since I don't ever care to do that, I refuse to join in the consensus of blaming mom/caretaker, unless, of course, there is a mom like Casey A. or little Robert Manwill's mom, others. They should and need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent. I'm not asking you to change your opinion - and I can see by the majority of comments that you have plenty of support in your opinion so please be my guest, just don't expect me to take on your views. TIA :cow: :Justice: