Oh yeah, I see 'nonsense':
'Perugia LE first coerced a false statement' So did she get RE-COERCED???
'used his office to strong-arm witnesses such as the homeless heroin addict'
I suppose you have proof of this?
'CNN handled Mignini with kid-gloves' That's rich... at least he had the nads to take on the nonsense and the PR campaign.
Also noted nonsense:
'didn't fit your theory of the case' :floorlaugh: Nothing you think about this case fits my theory, because it is like explaining something to a deaf man.
The coercion of AK continued for many hours. Mignini was brought in in the middle, as you know perfectly well.
I said the program "hinted" that Mignini has strong-armed the heroin addict, that the latter had received favors in return for his testimony. Mignini was shown strongly denying that any such thing happened. Since it wasn't my claim in the first place, I don't really have to prove it happened.