wasnt_me
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 5,417
- Reaction score
- 10,987
I appreciate your fairness in discounting the histories of the defendants. I think RG's background is far more serious than AK's or RS', but you are certainly right there's nothing in his known history that screams rapist or murderer.
But in leaping to the "group dynamic" as an alternative explanation, you point out the problem with the pro-guilty stance. There is more evidence of RG's criminal background than there is of a criminal "group dynamic" between AK, RS and RG. There is simply no evidence the three ever met as a group, much less formed a psychological bond so dysfunctional it ended in murder. And there isn't enough time for them to have done so on the night of the murder.
You might as well blame satanism, as Mignini has already tried.
This is very true. According to what we've been told:
1. RS and RG had never met.
2. AK and RG were "hi, bye" acquaintances, as described by RG, and AK only recalls seeing him once or twice.
3. RS was a virgin. Despite magna, etc, he had only had sex for the first time a week prior to the murder. A good example is that fact that we ALL are entralled by discussing murder cases. If someone came up dead and we knew them, who should assume, based on the fact that we come to this thread everyday to discuss this murder, that we had anything to do with the person who died down the street?
4. If the group was intent about a "sex game gone wrong," it is my belief that we would have seen more than a questionable rape, sexual assault at minimum on MK. I think it's very odd that three people intent upon doing this to her in a frenzy would all three decide at once that enough was enough and they weren't going through with it.
5. The idea that RS and AK would break their pattern of what they'd been doing for a week is also highly unlikely. It's been stated that they spent every night together since they'd met, and they'd spent those nights at RS's house. AK would return home to shower each morning. RF said that, so why would this night of Nov 1st be any different? This also sets up the case for why AK's prints and RS's prints might not have been prevailent in the cottage. They weren't there that much, except to make lunch in the afternoons, so I've read.
6. It is also said that AK went out alone on Halloween, hung out with people at her job and met up with RS later. She probably did want to hang out with MK, but I'm conjecting that the more MK revealed about Ak's oddities, her snobby british friends (my opinion of them) started looking sour and detering MK from having AK around. MK might have started to feel the same way. From what I've read about AK, she doesn't really understand when people don't like her, and she doesn't understand when to NOT like other people. It's possible she was oblivious to MK's changing feelings. Anyways, so my point is, if she knew RG, why not go hang out with him on Halloween?
7. RG seemed to not have sought AK or RS out on Halloween, either. For people who like to party, it was a partying night. So why weren't these three "buddies" together?
What is so different about RS and AK that they are not given the same benefit of the doubt that RG is now enjoying in the discussions?