Denial of all evidence is the point/pattern.
Anything for innocent? No, not really. There is a PILE of different 'things' the innocent side tries mightily to excuse away.
Then maybe claiming that pro-innocenters refuse to see any signs of guilt should stop, since conversely the one making that claim refuses to see any possibility of innocence.
'Storming off' comes from the Daily Mail articles with Patrick's interviews IIRC.
I'll have to look again.
So, it's from a tabloid which Nicki has since clarified Patrick's position on. Therefore, I see no reason anyone should believe the "storming off claim".
Filomena testified she closed the outside shudders because of the wood being swollen and tightened against the sill. A couple of examples of people being mistaken or not remembering exactly don't take away (or excuse) from the continuous lies that RG, AK, and RS have told as evidence was produced against them implying guilt. Any comparison is bogus IMO.
From the judge's report:
It must be held that when Filomena Romanelli left the house in via della Pergola, she had pulled the shutters towards the interior of her room, although she did not think that she had actually closed them
I doubt all 'infected' earring holes look the same, but as noted it is a convenient excuse for blood drops... then again IMO she would have noticed blood dripping from her ear into the sink. :waitasec: Also wondering if maybe the lamp was in the room to look for a torn out earring... and her neck looked a little scraped or something in some pics too IMO.
What you seem to be saying is that you don't believe her drop of blood in the sink was from her recent piercing. But the problem is that she was inspected by ILE for any injuries and none were found. So this idea that she was wounded while attacking Meredith just doesn't fly. On the other hand though, we know Amanda's ear was recently pierced and that recently pierced ears can bleed. Just Google "Pierced ears bleeding" and see all the people asking for help.
My reasons for the staging are the obvious ones, instead of the unreasonable or invented ones.
-No evidence whatsoever that anyone climbed the wall, went thru the window, or was inside the room (except AK/Meredith's blood drop).
-No glass on the ground outside the window.
-No disturbance on the ground outside the window.
-At least, semi-closed or pulled together shudders per Filomena.
-Rock thrown from inside the room IMO.
-Glass on top of clothes thrown to the floor.
-AK's dna mixed with a drop of Meredith's blood.
-Balcony way easier entry point for a true burgler, as seen by the 2 break-ins after the murder that used this route.
-Difficulty of getting to window ledge and pulling thru without leaving evidence of it.
-Room ransacked by throwing clothes on floor, but nothing of value stolen from the room... nothing!
Raffaele's lawyer claimed there was glass outside and there are no photos to prove otherwise. As Bruce Fisher pointed out on his website, there are clay/dust particles just under the window where RG would have stepped. The wall is full of imperfections, none of which can be disproved as scuffs from someone's shoes.
The break-ins after the murder couldn't be repeated via Filomena's room because bars were put on her window.
Where are AK and RS's footprints outside from when they would have grabbed the big rock?
The bathmat print is deluded in water because RS was cleaning his bare feet, and left the print. I wonder if the 'bathmat shuffle' story was concerning where the other prints went to? There are NO footprints at all of RG going to the bathroom with blood on his feet/shoes.
Since we disagree on whose footprint is on the mat I guess we can't progress from here on the subject.
If there were any prints of the two in Meredith's room, it is my opinion they were cleaned with the towels. But then again... maybe they didn't step in any blood except during the barefoot cleanup and didn't have to clean but a couple of other footprints/etc around the body.
I don't understand how saying "
maybe they didn't step in any blood except during the barefoot cleanup and didn't have to clean but a couple of other footprints/etc around the body," excuses the lack of Luminol prints in the murder room. If they stepped in any of Meredith's blood and tracked it in the hallway it would have originated in the bedroom, so you would expect to find some in there.
Regardless, the Luminol footprints tested negative for blood, as did the knife...
Anyone looking for articles/etc that support the verdict being correct and not seeing any are not looking very hard IMO, especially coming out from Italy.
Plus there is really no point of making too many articles/etc to discuss or defend the evidence when it won a guilty verdict... only for debating and what is under appeal IMO.
Uh, I haven't had to search for any articles that question the verdict or evidence since they all do, at least the ones since the release of the motivations report. I'm sure there are some articles from around the time of the verdict that supported it, but now that the fallacies of the judge's report have been revealed and so many early facts surrounding the case have since been proven false, it's very hard to find anyone in support of it.