Flutterby80
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,796
- Reaction score
- 27
Amy has been found safe.
This is the latest flyer floating around town..... I do not believe it is connected however we do not have missing people very often in this town. Any thoughts?
While I was searching for information on Amy Duck I ran across some information in a post(I couldnt retrieve it again) which said that the Norton Shores police search team
has been cut to one man looking for Jessica.
By watching shows covering cases that were eventually solved, it seems LE usually has a suspect or two early on. Sometimes it turns out the main suspect isn't guilty even though it appeared likey to be him or her. In J's case, LE focused solely on the videos of the van. I'm wondering, since they abruptly dropped the subject of the van, if they have identified it but haven't been able to pin down the driver (or enough evidence) in order to announce any details on the subject. LE may think if they sit, watch and wait that something will give and eventually allow them to proceed with the case armed with more evidence. This fits with the comment made along the line of someone knowing something more and they need to come forward. Of course the perp knows but someone else may know too. If they're afraid to come forward, it may take a long time before they do.
The fact that there hasn't been extensive searches of the surrounding area is baffling. What evidence exists to believe/support Jessica is still alive? Hope is good but let's be real too.
Another thought - if the van isn't involved, I doubt LE would come out and say that they've been wrong all along about the van (since they focused strongly on it for the first few weeks). They'd probably just back away from commenting which it seems like what they've done. Of course there's the remark when the Chief said the van is the van so why I'm doubting his word now I don't know. Should we consider the van fact? He stated it as fact. If that's the case, LE must know details about the van by now and can't let the public in on what they know as it would jeopardize the investigation.
Am I wrong, or did they search for Amy? I believe quite a few locations. I am just wondering what makes Jessica's case different? I may be wrong but wasn't Amy in a van?!
I just don't understand. Will Jessica be found? I hope so. I am losing faith though.
IMO, LE is always going to say the person is believed to alive, without actual evidence to show otherwise. They also often say "someone out there knows something", hoping to prompt memories.
I don't think LE has any evidence of anything pertaining to Jessica, except that she is gone.
Amy went missing in her own vehicle - a dark blue Chevy Venture with hubcaps missing. I don't know much about the searches for Amy because she was located rather quickly.
There were searches for Jessica in the first 72 hours or so after she was reportedly abducted, but there haven't been organized searches since then. I don't understand the lack of searches. The "one mission - find Jessica" slogan on the Find Jessica Heeringa Facebook site is baffling to me. How does anyone expect to "find Jessica" when no one is really looking for her?
https://www.facebook.com/FindJessicaHeeringa
Police Chief on Jessica Heeringa case: Now is not the time for independent ground searches
http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2013/05/police_chief_on_jessica_heerin.html
Most of this article addresses the subject of ground searches and why they are not advised by Norton Shores Police Chief Shaw.
This article was from May 14th, so about 2 and a half weeks after Jessica was abducted.
Now that it has been 3 months since Jessica was abducted, I wonder if they will Ever change their mind about ground searches?
I doubt it. There is reportedly only one investigator working the case at this time, and it has been a couple of months since there have been any LE updates. I fear that this case has gone cold.![]()