- Joined
- Apr 1, 2015
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 576
Who in the Monroe police department told you that a computer is missing?
Why would Monroe PD be commenting on a case that is not theirs, especially to those outside the agency?
Who in the Monroe police department told you that a computer is missing?
All I have ever heard from LE is the key to Julia's room was missing. As far as I know nothing else is missing from apt. Now it may be that LE doesn't want the public to know if there is anything else missing. Funny thing is I don't know if the key to enter their apt. is missing or was it left on Julia's key chain in her purse, perhaps someone else knows the answer to that.
As for JT being investigated in Nov. 2012 on Child porn??? The first that we heard about the child porn investigation was in Feb. 2015 when Monroe LE went to their home with a search warrant, because the computer that YPSI LE took in Dec. 2014 had Child porn on it.
As mentioned numerous times by Trojan and I, Both YPSILANTI & Monroe LE are telling us that the computer that Julia & Jennifer bought for JT as a Christmas present in 2012 (yes the year that Julia was murdered) is missing. Neither computer taken from the Turnquist's home was JT's computer! If that was such a necessity to have for his business, wonder why it can't be found!?
Also a reminder, LE has Julia's phone, it was recovered from her apt. The day they found her murdered. And they have her computer and purse.
If all LE found was "normal" porn, why would they have been so determined to prosecute? This case has been through District Court and seems to have been somewhat validated to be sent to Circuit Court. If this had been "normal" porn, wouldn't it have been dropped in District Court? District Court is where these things are "weeded out" and District Court can not do a trial for any felonies. Evidently there was enough things to warrant a trial in Circuit Court. I know JT was offered a plea deal which he did not accept but as time goes on, LE has more time to do more investigating. It should be common knowledge, the longer LE "digs" the more things they will find. IMO These "delays" in the trial may have very well worked in LE favor.
Why would Monroe PD be commenting on a case that is not theirs, especially to those outside the agency?
Maybe because they knew of another computer (probably from Ypsilanti LE) that was now missing, and it may have had even more child porn?
Why would Monroe PD be commenting on a case that is not theirs, especially to those outside the agency?
Thanks Psyquestor, I have NO intention of responding to those that ask questions but don't answer any... And again, look at where they are getting their information from, KT & JT. And who is it, .... JT, that is the ONLY person of interest now!Ironic when people who refuse to answer questions, pose questions themselves (and expect answers). Stirring the pot indeed. I'll be back when sock puppets retire from the "game." I'm a patient sort and can wait for MSM to reveal more. I've bored of the constant baiting and he said - she said. It is truly nauseating since a beautiful girl has lost her life but her own step father is standing in the way of LE progressing on her murder case.
4ist, If I was you I'd ignore any questions unless others provide answers themselves. But of course, JMOO
Why would an agency jeopardize their investigation into an unrelated case (at this point) in the eyes of the law and courts? Its obvious the two cases are being treated differently as Trojan is unable to gather any information regarding the porn case.
Ironic when people who refuse to answer questions, pose questions themselves (and expect answers). Stirring the pot indeed. I'll be back when sock puppets retire from the "game." I'm a patient sort and can wait for MSM to reveal more. I've bored of the constant baiting and he said - she said. It is truly nauseating since a beautiful girl has lost her life but her own step father is standing in the way of LE progressing on her murder case.
4ist, If I was you I'd ignore any questions unless others provide answers themselves. But of course, JMOO
Why would an agency jeopardize their investigation into an unrelated case (at this point) in the eyes of the law and courts? Its obvious the two cases are being treated differently as Trojan is unable to gather any information regarding the porn case.
I'm sure this was discussed earlier, but I wasn't aware of it until now when I read an earlier article. Julia was asphyxiated before she was placed in the bathtub. The article goes on to describe a medical condition Julia shared with her twin and her mother, vasovagal syncope. This condition can cause an individual to lose consciousness at moments of high distress, but was "absolutely" ruled out as a factor in her death.
In light of the other facts, i.e., no sign of forced entry, no evidence of robbery, Christmas gifts still wrapped, purse "untouched"; one could surmise that Julia's death was set up to look like an accidental drowning after she suddenly lost consciousness while taking a bath. I'm not pointing fingers at the stepdad or anyone else, but I can see now why LE might be looking for a suspect who knew Julia well enough to be aware of her medical condition, but who was unaware that an autopsy could rule out a vasovagal syncope event prior to drowning. Just a thought.
http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2013/11/julia_niswender.html
Thank you for your common sense, Anya. Please feel free to join us.
Very interesting! Especially the bit about how it leaves very little physical markings behind.I know this may seem off the wall but I was reading a book the other day and they mentioned "burking", sitting on the chest and suffocating then while holding their mouth and nose shut.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/burking/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very interesting! Especially the bit about how it leaves very little physical markings behind.
I know this may seem off the wall but I was reading a book the other day and they mentioned "burking", sitting on the chest and suffocating then while holding their mouth and nose shut.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/burking/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That sounds horrible, I wish I had never seen that, in the context of Julia, as there is no way to know and it seems gratuitously painful to her loved ones to take such gruesome guesses. Sorry monster, I know you present it to consider what is possible and with good intent and to help.
She did not die of suffocation but drowning, so it may stand to reason that she would have lost her breath close to the bathtub, not having had a chance to regain her breath before being drowned. She did not drown by her own will nor with a chance to put up much of a fight it seems, from the ME report. And she was known to stand up for herself.
I keep remembering that she had been planning to study that night, so whatever happened to Julia must have seemed so out of the blue to her. What ideas were in her head from her studying that night; how far had she gotten in her studying for her next exam; and what class was it she was studying for? I don't know why, just trying to imagine, going from studying for a college class then all of sudden for her to confront her death. Did she have a chance to scream? Did she have a conversation with her killer? Will it forever be unknown? Did she plead to live? Did she know she would die as she felt her breath forced out?
See monster, this path of conjecture leaves these questions that only the killer can come close to answering and it hurts to think about them, and I'm a complete stranger to Julia.