- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- 993
You have nice friends that are willing to be guinea pigs for scientific experiments!I do remember family members saying Julia took showers as far as they remembered. So, I'm speculating the attacker(s) filled the tub with water to remove evidence and possibly try to make Julia's death look like an accident.
So, I did a little experiment using a friend who's about Julia's size in a standard size bathtub. We filled the bathtub up to full just below the metal overdrain and this is what we found:
1. She cannot fully fit in the tub, in a face down position.
2. Her legs have to bend up at the knee.
3. She is partially submerged because her body floats up in this position.
This is crazy because if someone was trying to stage a drowning in the bathtub it would seem more believable if a person of Julia's size was placed on their back into the bathtub with their legs folded at the knee (the knees are out of the bath, and the lower leg and foot submerged). Then, their head lowered into the bathtub water, like they passed out or something. Based on the size of a standard tub and layout the bathroom, falling face first, it seems impossible to land in the position Julia was found.
I think that with a high probability, the attacker did NOT attempt to make the crime scene look like an accident. The body was found in an unnatural position, the room was in disarray, a pillow case was obviously missing, there was a bloody glove, and the apartment key was missing. It almost seems like the perpetrator made sure that it did NOT look like an accident.
However, there is some staging. I think there may be 2 possible reasons. First, the attacker want to hide his identity. Second, the perpetrator may want the body found in a particular way, matching his perverse fantasy. (I am assuming here that the person who did this is one male, but this is of course not certain.)
Those are some good questions. I don't think the scene was staged to look like a robbery. Julia being partially closed wouldn't fit. Perhaps the perpetrator is someone she knows but who people generally not associate with her. Perhaps the perpetrator wanted to make sure that there is nothing in the room (such as letters, cards, gifts) that would be associated with him.So, I have to wonder, was Julia placed into the bathtub in an effort to remove evidence only? Or, maybe to preserve the body longer? How much time did the attacker(s) think would go by before Julia would be looked in on? Did the attacker(s) think whom ever found her would quickly remove Julia from the tub in an effort to help, before LE arrived on the scene?
It just seems like someone panicked, only halfway calculating a bathtub drowning the same way they halfway calculated staging a possible robbery in Julia's room, ransacking, with nothing of value missing, except Julia's keys. As for the rubber gloves being found. I hazard to think, but if the attacker(s) were using rubber gloves, why didn't they use a condom? And why use rubber gloves and leave them behind. Seems like another halfway calculated staging to me?
Maybe the disarray of the room, and the bloody glove were just meant to confuse investigators.
I think that the semen found may also have been planted.
If someone(s) calculated Julia's death, why in early December did this senseless death have to happen? Was it because the opportunity became available? As far as we know, the attacker(s) came to Julia's apartment unannounced, Julia let them in, or the attacker(s) had a key or something. There was no sign of forced entry.