I doubt it, the abuse charges were civil, meaning there wasn't enough evidence for a criminal charge. The worst he would have faced would be a loss of custody.
The only two reasons for an arrest IMO would be them finding her body or a confession by DS. I suppose they could charge him on an assumed homicide, but the evidence they have as far as we know is not enough to sustain that. I doubt there is any witness that could result in him being arrested, unless someone else was involved directly with the homicide and they confessed, but that seems somewhat unlikely.
So, if there is no new evidence, did they catch him about to skip town? SPECULATING. I am thinking about Scott Peterson.
I also don't think they'd make these moves this late in an evening unless something major has changed. The forensics seems a plausible explanation at this point, but clearly this is extremely upsetting news for her parents, not just a heads up about Doug going to jail, which they've expressed interest in having happen anyway. JMO MOOAfter learning of Doug's arrest, Newschannel 3 went to the home of Venus' parents where we found several state police cars and detectives outside.
One detective told Newschannel 3 that Venus' father, Larry McComb, was not feeling well and that it was not a good time to talk.
Source for above quotations: http://www.wwmt.com/articles/stewart-1378126-doug-newschannel.html
MY COMMENT: I don't think several state police cars and detectives would be at Venus's parent's house if Doug were simply arrested for child molestation.
Since he was arraigned already for inappropriate sexual contact with his daughter, the arraignment tomorrow has to be for murder or kidnapping, in my opinion.
So, if there is no new evidence, did they catch him about to skip town? SPECULATING. I am thinking about Scott Peterson.
Probably they had exhausted all their leads, had no body and decided to throw the dice and go with what they had.
Probably they had exhausted all their leads, had no body and decided to throw the dice and go with what they had.
or it could be LE and/or the DA and childrens GAL explained to Venus' parents what the child would have to go through at a criminal trial. How she would be treated by the defense attorney. How she would have to be put on the stand...
And the decision/choice was made to opt for a civil trial rather than a criminal trial even if they had enough evidence for a crimal child solely to avoid putting this child through any more emotional turmoil than she has already endured.
JMO
That's simply not how prosecutors work.
That is unlikely, the original complaint was made by Venus months ago and it would have been investigated back then. The current trial was clearly a tactic by child protective services to do anything to avoid or delay DS getting the children. They only filed the charge after he petitioned for custody. If Venus had not gone missing there would have been no abuse charges and the status quo would have continued. Obviously this stuff would have come up (or should have) in the original custody hearing and whatever it was couldn't have been all that serious otherwise DS wouldn't have been allowed contact at all.
Well, apparently it is in this case, if they are going with what they have, since at the moment they appear to have neither evidence of homicide nor are they able to place him at the scene.
But it did originally come up, no? Since he had only phone contact for visitation while the investigation was on going since the time Venus filed the complaint. The investigation of the alleged sexual abuse charges were never proven unfounded or unsubstantiated IIRC.
It was my understanding this is a single investigation which has been ongoing since Venus originally filed the compaint, not a second investigation to the allegations. I could be wrong, but that was my understanding.
ETA: Not to mention, Doug sought supervised visitation... thus he already knew the allegations were never disproven and were still being investigated.
Is there a link that says they don't have evidence about a homicide or placing him at the scene?
You can never disprove allegations of that sort. They would have interviewed the children when the complaint was made and there isn't much more to investigate beyond that.
If they allready had those things they would have arrested him before now. In the link I provided earlier it was said that they decided to proceed with the case and that it isn't linked to any new evidence or DNA. So, nothing new in other words.
That depends on ones definition of new. The word new could have been defined as in the last hour, few hours. This could have been in late last week thus not considered 'new'.
IMO, they finally crossed the t's, dotted the i's and collectively pieced the evidence they had for them to believe they had enough to convict.
jmo
I'm dying to know if they recovered Venus' remains or will be proceeding with a murder trial without a body.
Any thoughts on whether or not she's been recovered?
If what was posted on FB that Venus's mother has been hospitalized
and the hospitalization occured as a result of the news LE provided her
and I can't beleive a body has not been recovered.
I tend to think, if Venus' remains had not been recovered
her mothers reaction ( if hospitalized as a result of the news....)
would still be to have hope.
![]()
Thoughts?
I'm dying to know if they recovered Venus' remains or will be proceeding with a murder trial without a body.
Any thoughts on whether or not she's been recovered?
If what was posted on FB that Venus's mother has been hospitalized
and the hospitalization occured as a result of the news LE provided her
and I can't beleive a body has not been recovered.
I tend to think, if Venus' remains had not been recovered
her mothers reaction ( if hospitalized as a result of the news....)
would still be to have hope.
![]()
Thoughts?