You are correct, which is why it's probably very, very low probability that it was a pocket call.
Just branching off here
and then it just happens to be someone that has walked the neighborhood? That lowers the probability even more doesnt it?
You are correct, which is why it's probably very, very low probability that it was a pocket call.
I can see her pink hair flowing in the wind as she rides on the handlebars of Jersey's bike through the neighborhood. :great:
Yes, I thought of that too. But then, having gotten a wrong number, the caller would try again it seems.
The odds of that happening would be very small indeed. But if someone wanted to do a red herring call they wouldn't call a random number, they would call someone they know lives somewhere close.
If LE was able to ping the location of the phone at the time of the call, that information right there would speak volumes.
So piecing this together, JI and DB each had a cell phone. Likely on the same account.
DB's phone breaks so the only working phone is JI's. DB gets a phone from her father the day before. She claims that they are all on the counter because she is reprogramming information into the donated phone.
When the phones are taken she claims that 2 are working and one is broken. What does she mean by broken? Did it not even power up? Is she reprogramming information from JI's phone into the new donated phone? So now she's got two phones that power up but are they both now connected to the main account that is restricted? Could she do this by taking the sim card from her broken phone and using it in the new donated phone? If she did this, did she check the new donated phone to see if it could call out? And if was simply a sim card transfer, what would she have to "reprogram"?
Someone mentioned that only one would be restricted on certain carriers. If it was JI's that was the main phone and DB's was broken, then they would not have been able to use any phone until the donated phone was "hooked up". Unless they paid the bill, the carrier would not connect her new donated phone to the account would they? Or maybe they would? Anyone know this?
So if she simply transferred a sim card from her broken phone to the donated phone, the donated phone would instantly become the second phone? Which may have had service if the restriction was only on the main phone?
MW says she doesn't know the Irwins but the only way LE would know if her number is on the contact list for the phone that "called her" would be to have the physical phone or at least the sim card wouldn't it?
If DB made the call, perhaps to a wrong number, she wouldn't stay on the line for 50 seconds. And if she was trying to reach someone, she would have called the correct number after hanging up from the wrong one. If an intruder made the call, perhaps to the correct number then MW hopefully has given more info to LE than she is willing to give to the press. If she is connected to a family member somehow, and is not involved, I would hope she has forwarded this info on to them. If she is involved then I suppose we'll get more lying.
If it was a "pocket call" that went to this person's voicemail and was disconnected after 50 seconds, then the number was either programmed into the phone or in the most bizzare set of circumstances, it randomly dialed a local number.
Anyone have any thoughts about all this?
MOO
If LE was able to ping the location of the phone at the time of the call, that information right there would speak volumes.
Only problem with that theory is wouldn't she had hung up the second she heard the VM of someone else? I don't know any cell phone that actually takes 50 seconds before VM picks up (more like 20-25 seconds).
If LE was able to ping the location of the phone at the time of the call, that information right there would speak volumes.
The lady says she didn't know them, unless you don't believe her.
Maybe if the voicemail replies with a personal recorded message from the person you wanted to reach. But some of my acquaintances have just a machine voice saying that the person you attempted to reach is unavailable, please leave a message. I wouldn't necessarily know I called a wrong number.
Another lie from DB exposed. "No one made a call, the phones were not working." This woman lies a lot. MOO
Yes, and that's what's intriguing. I fully believe this points right at the direction of an intruder. Someone she's not thinking of, who she does know or has met, called her.
The lady says she didn't know them, unless you don't believe her.
I already said I'm not sure I believe her. However, she does not have to know the Irwins at all in order for them to be able to sleuth her address and phone number.
I can see her pink hair flowing in the wind as she rides on the handlebars of Jersey's bike through the neighborhood. :great: