• #921
...though he had no idea who might also have been in that apartment. And previously, he also walked into a salon in Decatur, TX, put a gun to a woman's head, and then forced her, another woman, and a 5yr old child into a closet.

In both cases, he was brazen and didn't seem to care whoever else might be inside.
Cox never gained entry to the woman's apartment and walked into an open hair salon to rob it. One perp somehow gaining access to the house or getting them outside is much more difficult to do as opposed to two or more people who at least one of the women knew. Cox was very sloppy in the other crimes he committed. I think he likes toying with the cops and the media. I can't see him pulling this off.
 
  • #922
But the evidence showed the girls had spent time changing into sleep clothes, removing make up in the bathroom and otherwise getting ready for bed. You would think they would have had some interaction with Levitt, either looking in on her or talking to her. Their dog would have also been upset and barking if there were a stranger in the house with them.
what if levitt was in her room with the perp, but streeter not wanting to wake her mother up goes straight to her bedroom with mccall. the 2 girls were probably tipsy from the party they had just left, they then settle down for the night not knowing the perp is already in the house.
 
  • #923
i thought the same. perp was in levitt home when streeter and mccall arrived home at 2 30AM.
levitt dress was missing. levitt would not be wearing a dress to paint and varnish. did levitt go on a date with a mystery man, as she was not expecting streeter to come home until monday.
 
  • #924
Cox never gained entry to the woman's apartment and walked into an open hair salon to rob it. One perp somehow gaining access to the house or getting them outside is much more difficult to do as opposed to two or more people who at least one of the women knew. Cox was very sloppy in the other crimes he committed. I think he likes toying with the cops and the media. I can't see him pulling this off.
cox was correct when he said the person who did this knew what they were doing.
 
  • #925
Possibly because Streeter and McCall were in two separate vehcles and their vehicles, unless stopped at stoplight would have been moving. Kidnapping them in their cars would have been very difficult. Abducting them from the home would only require a ruse of some sort to get one of the women to the door and from there the culprit could either by force or threaten them wih a weapon.

I have wondered if the killer wasn't possibly a perp on the prowl and saw the girls as they made their way to the Levitt house and followed them to the house, waited until they got in and them used the ruse or weapon to get control of them.

I just hope that someday we find out how it all went down and who was responsible for this horrible crime.
they would not know who also might be in the house. levitt car was outside, so the perp would be taking a big risk following them into the house.
 
  • #926
levitt dress was missing. levitt would not be wearing a dress to paint and varnish. did levitt go on a date with a mystery man, as she was not expecting streeter to come home until monday.
The missing dress is an interesting tidbit I didn’t know. Can you elaborate or point me to the source ?
I had always thought that Levitt had a friend/date over - there was something about her car not being parked in the car port as it usually was, made me think she had company and that the girls (at least Streeter) were familiar with. That would account for Streeter not saying/kissing her Mom good night, which was her habit. (Ozarks True Crime - Anne Roderique Jones - podcast). So, girls show up without calling, don’t bother Mom because she has company, take make up off and get into bed….i suspected that an accomplice showed up later and helped restrain the women and put them in a van. ATJ’s podcast also mentions the neighbor across the street who was up early and saw Streeter driving the van as she used her driveway to turn around. JMO MOO and all that.
 
  • #927
levitt dress was missing. levitt would not be wearing a dress to paint and varnish. did levitt go on a date with a mystery man, as she was not expecting streeter to come home until monday
Sherrill Levitt last seen wearing a floral print dress. Not sure this means with certainty, though, that a dress was actually missing.

Sherrill didn't say anything about any date on the phone call to her friend (at least not that I'm aware of).

With all that said, this still seems quite possible.
 
  • #928
they would not know who also might be in the house. levitt car was outside, so the perp would be taking a big risk following them into the house.
That is true. But, if he had a gun, he may have felt he could pull off the abduction regardless of who or how many were in the house.
 
  • #929
levitt dress was missing. levitt would not be wearing a dress to paint and varnish. did levitt go on a date with a mystery man, as she was not expecting streeter to come home until monday.
Do you have a source for this? The dress?
 
  • #930
The missing dress is an interesting tidbit I didn’t know. Can you elaborate or point me to the source ?
I had always thought that Levitt had a friend/date over - there was something about her car not being parked in the car port as it usually was, made me think she had company and that the girls (at least Streeter) were familiar with. That would account for Streeter not saying/kissing her Mom good night, which was her habit. (Ozarks True Crime - Anne Roderique Jones - podcast). So, girls show up without calling, don’t bother Mom because she has company, take make up off and get into bed….i suspected that an accomplice showed up later and helped restrain the women and put them in a van. ATJ’s podcast also mentions the neighbor across the street who was up early and saw Streeter driving the van as she used her driveway to turn around. JMO MOO and all that.
i heard about this dress somewhere, but cant remember the source. there is a photo of streeter/levitt, mother and daughter taken outside delmar st, and levitt is wearing a blue dress, and holding cinnamon the dog. is this the missing dress.
 
  • #931
After researching again, I found some more connections that may have already been mentioned.

  • "Cassidy Rainwater" Connection: Some speculation has linked the case to the Cassidy Rainwater murder case in Windyville, MO, with claims that a similar van was found on the property where that murder occurred, although this is not confirmed by law enforcement.
  • Previous Crimes: Speculation once linked the case to other unsolved regional crimes, such as the abduction of Jackie Johns (later linked to Gerald Carnahan).

I have included some somewhat recent links about the case as well.


Other links that you may not have seen:

Key Details of the Unsolved Case:

  • The Disappearance: The three women were last seen around 2:15 a.m. on June 7, 1992, after returning to Levitt’s home, notes the City of Springfield, MO.
  • Missing Evidence:There were no signs of forced entry. The home contained the women's purses, money, cigarettes, and vehicles, says the Springfield News-Leader.
    Contaminated Scene: Friends and family gathering at the house the next day unknowingly cleaned up potential evidence, including broken glass from a porch light, explains a YouTube video.
  • No Suspects: Despite thousands of tips over three decades, no one has ever been charged.

    Not sure if any of this helps, but I'm really trying here.
 
  • #932
After researching again, I found some more connections that may have already been mentioned.

  • "Cassidy Rainwater" Connection: Some speculation has linked the case to the Cassidy Rainwater murder case in Windyville, MO, with claims that a similar van was found on the property where that murder occurred, although this is not confirmed by law enforcement.
  • Previous Crimes: Speculation once linked the case to other unsolved regional crimes, such as the abduction of Jackie Johns (later linked to Gerald Carnahan).

I have included some somewhat recent links about the case as well.


Other links that you may not have seen:

Key Details of the Unsolved Case:

  • The Disappearance: The three women were last seen around 2:15 a.m. on June 7, 1992, after returning to Levitt’s home, notes the City of Springfield, MO.
  • Missing Evidence:There were no signs of forced entry. The home contained the women's purses, money, cigarettes, and vehicles, says the Springfield News-Leader.
    Contaminated Scene: Friends and family gathering at the house the next day unknowingly cleaned up potential evidence, including broken glass from a porch light, explains a YouTube video.
  • No Suspects: Despite thousands of tips over three decades, no one has ever been charged.

    Not sure if any of this helps, but I'm really trying here.
I’ve always wondered if the same guys who tortured and killed Cassidy Rainwater were linked to the Springfield 3. Those guys were capable of anything and they lived close by.
 
  • #933
I’ve always wondered if the same guys who tortured and killed Cassidy Rainwater were linked to the Springfield 3. Those guys were capable of anything and they lived close by.

Timothy Norton was 27 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared on June 7, 1992.

  • Birth Year: Norton was 56 years old when he was arrested in connection with the murder of Cassidy Rainwater in September 2021. This places his birth year around 1965.
  • Disappearance Date: The "Springfield Three"—Sherrill Levitt, Suzie Streeter, and Stacy McCall—went missing on June 7, 1992.
James Phelps was 29 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared.
 
  • #934
Timothy Norton was 27 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared on June 7, 1992.

  • Birth Year: Norton was 56 years old when he was arrested in connection with the murder of Cassidy Rainwater in September 2021. This places his birth year around 1965.
  • Disappearance Date: The "Springfield Three"—Sherrill Levitt, Suzie Streeter, and Stacy McCall—went missing on June 7, 1992.
James Phelps was 29 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared.
Thank you for sharing their ages. They would definitely be old enough to be involved in making Sherrill, Suzie and Stacy disappear. God knows what else they were up to.

I have suspicions about Stacy’s ex and other men that have proven to be kind of creepy and were around at that time. That barely rules any one out lol.

It’s like you find one or two criminals and then you find more and it’s scary how many women have disappeared or been found killed near Springfield MO.

I’m glad this thread is open again!
 
  • #935
Timothy Norton was 27 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared on June 7, 1992.

  • Birth Year: Norton was 56 years old when he was arrested in connection with the murder of Cassidy Rainwater in September 2021. This places his birth year around 1965.
  • Disappearance Date: The "Springfield Three"—Sherrill Levitt, Suzie Streeter, and Stacy McCall—went missing on June 7, 1992.
James Phelps was 29 years old when the "Springfield Three" disappeared.
OMG I just looked up CRs case - including some local Lebanon perspective from Reddit. Those 2 - JP and TN - are monsters. I wouldn’t put anything past them, including hunting for girls on graduation weekend in Springfield. Ugh! I’m never gonna get to sleep. Extra disturbing 🤮
 
  • #936
Cox never gained entry to the woman's apartment and walked into an open hair salon to rob it. One perp somehow gaining access to the house or getting them outside is much more difficult to do as opposed to two or more people who at least one of the women knew. Cox was very sloppy in the other crimes he committed. I think he likes toying with the cops and the media. I can't see him pulling this off.
true, but he did work on delmar st.
 
  • #937
This is all TOTALLY my opinion only, but here's my best guess on Delmar pieced together with what we know (feel free to challenge/correct any and everything)

While the girls are out at various parties, we have Sherrill finishing furniture at home. She most likely would have changed clothes from graduation if she was stripping chairs and hanging wallpaper border, right? You would THINK LE would have been able to find and pinpoint these clothes in her hamper due to wallpaper paste/varnish residue and even smell. But I guess that info wasn't released.

So she's probably got on refinishing clothes, she's working and taking occasional breaks to talk on the phone to friends (and probably smoke). I'm looking for more info regarding which room was being wallpapered and where the chair was being stripped but unless it was all happening in her bedroom, she most likely opens her bedroom window, the solid front door, and maybe even Susie's sliding door to air out the house as the fumes would be pretty unbearable without doing so.

Cinnamon gets out at 10:00pm. Possibly Sherrill is still on the phone with the 9:30 caller so she doesn't notice. Neighbors "put him back over the fence"- I'm guessing there's a hole maybe between the neighbor's shared back fence? He apparently gets out often, since they immediately knew him and what to do with him- no walking around with the dog or bringing him to the door like they would if this were something new. I saw where there was possibly a doggie door (conflicting statements about whether it was there then or added later) but if the dog gets out of the fence often, you'd think Sherrill would have made it inaccessible until the fence hole was fixed? From photos, she seems to care a lot about this little dog. She then talks to another friend at 11:00. And that was the last person to talk to her that we know of.

Bartt says she slept in the nude I think, so she would have definitely been that way this night if she had gone to bed not expecting company. And since Joy's testimony states that the girls were planning to stay with him until 2:00am when he revoked the offer, we can at least infer that Sherrill probably wasn't aware they were coming. I don't think Janelle's was ever an option Susie and Stacy considered due to the evidence we have. My opinion only. If the doggie door wasn't blocked, I'm thinking Sherrill may close her bedroom door at night to keep Cinnamon from getting out while she's sleeping.

Ok, so girls arrive at Delmar, probably around 2:30-2:45. Maybe Sherill is still up but in bed reading. She hears them pull up, and if she's in the nude, maybe she grabs the first thing she sees which perhaps is the dress from graduation? I could see her leaving it out to be dry-cleaned. They go inside and are immediately smacked in the face by the smell of varnish/wallpaper paste/new wallpaper. To someone with recurring migraines like Stacy, this would be a nightmare sleeping situation. But Sherrill and Susie seem like sweet understanding folks, so maybe Sherrill once again opens the window and back door to get some additional fresh air inside--and Cinnamon once again goes through the fence hole and once again the neighbors put him back over. It's now 3am. Since I'm 99.9% sure the girls arrived at Delmar and this is a tight time frame, Cinnamon's escape at 3am makes me believe they were up and awake at this point.

There's one bathroom so Susie probably lets Stacy use it first because she's company. Maybe Susie turns the tv on the way she likes it, drinks a Coke and has a smoke, talking to her mom about the night while she waits for her turn. Stacy uses the first washcloth, gets her makeup off, undresses (possibly putting on some sweat pants or wind shorts of Susie's to sleep in) gets in bed. Then because we have two makeup stained washcloths, it's likely that Susie at least gets to the point where her makeup is off (if Sherrill is truly a tidy person, I can't see her leaving her own makeup cloths out on the sink). But because her pink shoes from the night and Sherrill's floral dress are missing according to Charley project, that tells me that maybe she didn't get much further than this before the perp(s) busted inside. We know that Cinnamon ends up loose INSIDE the home and that the doors are all closed (not locked but closed) when found the next day IF Janelle is to be believed. Because Cinnamon had not escaped again by 12:30 when Janelle & Mike get there, this confirms to me that he either didn't know how or was blocked from the doggie door. Again, this backs up the theory that a door was opened at some point again around 3am and then closed back up before the perps left.

So the perp(s) get inside somehow, Stacy is in the bed, Susie and Sherrill are possibly still dressed. They gain control of the women somehow (probably easily with Sherrill/Susie if one of them was threatened) and possibly corral them to Susie's room as the living room has a huge picture window facing the street and they will need some light to keep control of the women. Now they'll need to get them out to the getaway vehicle. I tend to support the van sightings because I believe it would take at least two, if not three perps to pull this off and then you have the three women- six people is a lot to hide making your escape. If the backyard is fenced in and the garage door is dead bolted without an obvious key, the front door becomes the only option. LE also tells us they are confident they left through the front door. But right now, the porch light is on and that would be shining a spotlight on the exit pathway. I simply cannot see an experienced criminal capable of pulling this off who wouldn't turn the light off to take them out. Now here's where I found something interesting but unconfirmed. I read in one thread posted by hurricane that the previous home owner said this switch was "sticky". That a lot of times flipping the switch wouldn't turn the porch light off as intended and vice versa. So if this is true and the light switch isn't working, the only way to disable the light is to remove the globe and at least twist the bulb. Maybe the perp does this and puts the globe down on the porch intending to replace it when he leaves. But it gets knocked/broken/stepped on by one of them in the process of leaving? OR, he accidentally breaks it trying to get it off and cuts himself in the process leaving some evidence behind?

As for the parking situation and witness testimony: Nigel said Susie usually parked directly behind Sherrill and the paper person said parking changed between 3:45 and the next afternoon. So if this is true, that means the women were still inside the house at 3:45. IF Susie was parked in her usual spot behind Sherrill and Stacy was pulled up to the inner portion of the semi-circle, thats a LONG walk with hostages to get to the pulled up van. So maybe they decide to rearrange the cars and gather the purses in order to find the keys. Maybe they don't know the women well enough to know exactly whose purse is whose, so they'll need to gather them all. Carefully pull out the wallets and keys to be sure he doesn't leave evidence. Don't worry about putting them back inside and closing them back up, too risky.

Perp two goes out, backs Stacy's car up. He pulls up as far as he can and backs Susie up too, only he doesn't have big of a turn radius from there so he ends up kind of wonky in the grass. Perp one watches this through the blinds in Susie's room. Van is backed in, into the spot behind Sherrill's car. They take women out through the front door, load them in back of the van, turn the walkway light back on, replace the porch bulb, and leave.
This theory is so insightful and explains so many ‘oddities’ of the crime scene - SL’s dress missing, non-typical car placement, purses together, broken porch globe, no signs of forced entry. Very impressive!
So, who do you think did this? I used to think that it was someone who knew Suzie through her ex boyfriend (graveyard vandal), likely a biker. And, I chalked up the ‘friends and family’ camping out at Delmar as genuine concern and being naive about a crime actually being committed.
However, after reading back on this thread, I believe the behavior of JK and her bf and JK’s Mother, well, weird. I can understand JK wanting to spend the night with her boyfriend and her Mother wanting to preserve her reputation. That explains Branson, the change of plans and the 7:30AM phone call.
What doesn’t make sense is entering SL’s home, listening and erasing phone messages, making coffee, moving personal items and waiting HOURS to call police. It would be obvious that something was wrong when 3 purses and 3 cars were at the house and the women were gone. Hinky.
Initially, I doubted posts about deliberately contaminating the crime scene. I mean, it’s 1992 in a small town - no cell phones, no CSI, no IDiscovery channel…..but, even if JK’s Mom was close friends with Sherrill, and she wasn’t, it takes a LOT of nerve to do what she and her daughter did, which included allowing a total of 18 (?) people traipse through the house before calling the police.
 
  • #938
Thank you for sharing their ages. They would definitely be old enough to be involved in making Sherrill, Suzie and Stacy disappear. God knows what else they were up to.

I have suspicions about Stacy’s ex and other men that have proven to be kind of creepy and were around at that time. That barely rules any one out lol.

It’s like you find one or two criminals and then you find more and it’s scary how many women have disappeared or been found killed near Springfield MO.

I’m glad this thread is open again!
The newspaper articles from 1992 are enlightening- as are some of 1992 news clips. The Apco clerk Steve Thompson, clearly remembers Sherrill asking him if he saw 3 girls - in the last 1 to 2 hours. He remembers Suzie and Stacy and another girl being there earlier buying him and candy. Most importantly, Stacy was in a car with an older man who forgot he needed cigarettes- which Suzie bought for him (Marlboro Lights). Who was this guy? Why is some blanket statement by JK (who wasn’t even with the teens that night) used to discredit this important info?
 
  • #939
This theory is so insightful and explains so many ‘oddities’ of the crime scene - SL’s dress missing, non-typical car placement, purses together, broken porch globe, no signs of forced entry. Very impressive!
So, who do you think did this? I used to think that it was someone who knew Suzie through her ex boyfriend (graveyard vandal), likely a biker. And, I chalked up the ‘friends and family’ camping out at Delmar as genuine concern and being naive about a crime actually being committed.
However, after reading back on this thread, I believe the behavior of JK and her bf and JK’s Mother, well, weird. I can understand JK wanting to spend the night with her boyfriend and her Mother wanting to preserve her reputation. That explains Branson, the change of plans and the 7:30AM phone call.
What doesn’t make sense is entering SL’s home, listening and erasing phone messages, making coffee, moving personal items and waiting HOURS to call police. It would be obvious that something was wrong when 3 purses and 3 cars were at the house and the women were gone. Hinky.
Initially, I doubted posts about deliberately contaminating the crime scene. I mean, it’s 1992 in a small town - no cell phones, no CSI, no IDiscovery channel…..but, even if JK’s Mom was close friends with Sherrill, and she wasn’t, it takes a LOT of nerve to do what she and her daughter did, which included allowing a total of 18 (?) people traipse through the house before calling the police.
i dont see there actions cleaning up at levitt home as suspicious. they are not true crime nuts like we are on here. they were really gullible. not being street smart, but they did not think the house was a crime scene. JM deleted a message from levitt answer machine because it was rude. she did not realise it could be connected to the 3 women going missing including stacy mccall his daughter. hindsight is a wonderfull thing.
 
  • #940
i dont see there actions cleaning up at levitt home as suspicious. they are not true crime nuts like we are on here. they were really gullible. not being street smart, but they did not think the house was a crime scene. JM deleted a message from levitt answer machine because it was rude. she did not realise it could be connected to the 3 women going missing including stacy mccall his daughter. hindsight is a wonderfull thing.
I certainly agree with the essence of what you say. I don’t believe these people deliberately contaminated the crime scene or delayed calling the police.
But, there were a lot of liberties taken by people who were not even close friends with Sherrill - most, if not all, hadn’t even been to her home prior to that day. Yet, they really made themselves at home - and allowed more than a dozen others to come into the home.
Bartt Streeter said in an interview that photos he was shown by police depicted scenes that ‘friends and family’ had changed, including Sherrill’s BED and the location of the purses! It took a lot of work by police to rearrange the home to depict what it actually looked like prior to the 18 ‘friends and family’ cleaning it and looking through their possessions.
And, reportedly, repairing a window shade….
All IMO and no disrespect to anyone who disagrees
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
1,841
Total visitors
1,968

Forum statistics

Threads
647,196
Messages
18,871,985
Members
246,245
Latest member
TiffanyLalla7
Top