Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #7

[MooseMeMuch]

This article gives us more insight into Stacy’s relationship with her mom.

Three Missing Women: Ten Years Later - Part 3 of 5

Janelle did not call Janis.
I've never read, or watched a video, that ever stated Janelle called Janis that Sunday.

And all that 'looking' around to include neighborhood and sandwich shop...even traveled to Shane's house......but didn't called her mom? They did all this looking...but didn't call her mom.

"See? We were concerned!" Well, why didn't you call Janis? I dunno....just seems......odd.

 

[k-mac]

Someone I trust very much and was very close to law enforcement told me explicitly there was in fact DNA found in or about the house.

Since Cox’s DNA would be on file, we can “probably” rule him out as unlikely.

My source revealed to me me that he had tracked this believed perp over a decade. His original source was from another very credible LE agency. He had the actual name, who, I believe, is likely the same individual who I believe is the one who murdered these women. But he refused to give me the name as it would compromise his source.

I haven’t changed my view that this was a crime committed by a single male predator. No one has rolled in 26 years.

The SPD said “kidnapper.” That is singular.

If someone disagrees, please explain.

Bit rich that a poster who only uses lingo like my source....single perp...cant reveil anything to you lot.....etc etc wants posters WHO ALREADY NAME THEIR SUSPECTS AND IDEAS to explain?????



right......

 

[chestnut&bypass]

MooseMeMuch, I hadn't ever heard of Janelle calling Janis either, but the article comes from our local paper, The Springfield NewsLeader....maybe just bad journalism? Can anybody shed any light on the veracity of whether or not it's accurate??

 

[TedMac]

Someone I trust very much and was very close to law enforcement told me explicitly there was in fact DNA found in or about the house.

Since Cox’s DNA would be on file, we can “probably” rule him out as unlikely.

My source revealed to me me that he had tracked this believed perp over a decade. His original source was from another very credible LE agency. He had the actual name, who, I believe, is likely the same individual who I believe is the one who murdered these women. But he refused to give me the name as it would compromise his source.

I haven’t changed my view that this was a crime committed by a single male predator. No one has rolled in 26 years.

The SPD said “kidnapper.” That is singular.

If someone disagrees, please explain.

Not disagreeing with you. But, could you tell us if this suspect is someone we have discussed here or is he someone unknown to us? Also, is this person a local or was he a random stranger to the 3 missing women? Finally, what was his motive and if there is DNA, could he not be linked to it? Thank you in advance for responding.

 

[Talullah]

QUOTE="chestnut&bypass, post: 14364294, member: 103860"]MooseMeMuch, I hadn't ever heard of Janelle calling Janis either, but the article comes from our local paper, The Springfield NewsLeader....maybe just bad journalism? Can anybody shed any light on the veracity of whether or not it's accurate??[/QUOTE]
The article states Janis and Janelle communicated that Sunday but doesn’t specify how or who called whom. LE could’ve asked the newspaper to omit details of Janis and Janelle’s conversation or the writer/editor may not have considered the details relevant at that time. Newspapers get info wrong all of the time. Someone may not double check a source and misquotes happen but with a high profile case like this I think the omission of details was more likely intentional rather than bad reporting.

 

[MooseMeMuch]

QUOTE="chestnut&bypass, post: 14364294, member: 103860"]MooseMeMuch, I hadn't ever heard of Janelle calling Janis either, but the article comes from our local paper, The Springfield NewsLeader....maybe just bad journalism? Can anybody shed any light on the veracity of whether or not it's accurate??

The article states Janis and Janelle communicated that Sunday but doesn’t specify how or who called whom. LE could’ve asked the newspaper to omit details of Janis and Janelle’s conversation or the writer/editor may not have considered the details relevant at that time. Newspapers get info wrong all of the time. Someone may not double check a source and misquotes happen but with a high profile case like this I think the omission of details was more likely intentional rather than bad reporting.[/QUOTE]

"Maybe Janis Knows" ? Is that what y'all are referring to?

Why would Janis call the Kirby house and insist, to Janelle's sister, that Stacy stayed with them?

(Poor Janis, she was beginning to get irritated.....no idea the women were actually.....gone.
I guess people live in denial as long as they can, a parent's worst nightmare...)

I'm attempting to get hold of Nigel...hope she answers back and has some answers for us. Y'all keep your fingers crossed!

 

[MooseMeMuch]

Bit rich that a poster who only uses lingo like my source....single perp...cant reveil anything to you lot.....etc etc wants posters WHO ALREADY NAME THEIR SUSPECTS AND IDEAS to explain?????



right......

I know......right? And then he just disappears or switches suspects! haha Is was the dog!!! Let's get Cinnamon's DNA, oh wait, poor thing has to be deceased by now
Smoke screen? Red Herrings? Why would a person do such a thing? To get attention? To 'play' people? Be the 'big shot'?

 

[SWMOgirl]

I know......right? And then he just disappears or switches suspects! haha Is was the dog!!! Let's get Cinnamon's DNA, oh wait, poor thing has to be deceased by now
Smoke screen? Red Herrings? Why would a person do such a thing? To get attention? To 'play' people? Be the 'big shot'?

I've never understood it either. I've read ALL the threads, including the 2 that were removed (prior to them being removed of course) Why make outrageous claims that you "know who did it" but can't reveal your sources. Please. Stop.

 

[Catmommy]

Well, we're not exactly about to form a vigilante posse, ride down any suspect and horse whip them until we get a confession or just plain string them up so why not offer up your "who dunnit". There is obviously a variable that remains unknown. As are the rest of the who, what, where, when and why.

 

[asyousay]

I've never understood it either. I've read ALL the threads, including the 2 that were removed (prior to them being removed of course) Why make outrageous claims that you "know who did it" but can't reveal your sources. Please. Stop.

This is so true as I have started to read thread one and so many posts about how I have heard something but I can’t possibly say anything. So then why even mention it ?!

In the UK we would call that baiting!

 

[asyousay]

Does anybody have any links to where this came from?. I have seen it mentioned throughout the threads but I have never seen a official source. If this is true then it points to somebody in the family as why would a person randomly steal photographs out of their photo frames?. IMO

Some photographs were taken. The frames were empty

 

[MooseMeMuch]

Does anybody have any links to where this came from?. I have seen it mentioned throughout the thread but I have never seen a official source. If this is true then it points to somebody in the family as why would a person randomly steal photographs out of their photo frames?. IMO

I think it was Bartt that supposedly noticed this but that too could be a rumor...

 

[cherrymeg]

I've never understood it either. I've read ALL the threads, including the 2 that were removed (prior to them being removed of course) Why make outrageous claims that you "know who did it" but can't reveal your sources. Please. Stop.

If someone knows who did it they should just come out with it. If it is someone already being discussed it seems okay to put the events you believe happened on here. If the person isn't already suspected or part of the case naming them might be against the rules, but if they are guilty that seems more important. This seems like a person trying to make themselves seem important and like they have inside knowledge. If they won't name sources but insist certain things are facts they are spreading misinformation.

 

[Talullah]

It boils down to this. If someone knows who’s responsible because they did their homework tell LE, and get that gold star!!

 

[cherrymeg]

It boils down to this. If someone knows who’s responsible because they did their homework tell LE, and get that gold star!!

I wasn't sure if the poster was hinting that law enforcement knew who did it but lacked proof. I totally agree with the whole if you know something about a crime report it to the proper authorities.

 

[asyousay]

Has Robert Cox’s mum died as he claimed he wouldn’t speak while she was alive?

 

[Missouri Mule]

Has Robert Cox’s mum died as he claimed he wouldn’t speak while she was alive?

I think he has always been blowing smoke.

 

[Missouri Mule]

Not disagreeing with you. But, could you tell us if this suspect is someone we have discussed here or is he someone unknown to us? Also, is this person a local or was he a random stranger to the 3 missing women? Finally, what was his motive and if there is DNA, could he not be linked to it? Thank you in advance for responding.

He has never been discussed as a suspect.

 

[cherrymeg]

He has never been discussed as a suspect.

Why can't you name the person?

 

[Missouri Mule]

Bit rich that a poster who only uses lingo like my source....single perp...cant reveil anything to you lot.....etc etc wants posters WHO ALREADY NAME THEIR SUSPECTS AND IDEAS to explain?????



right......

The single perp came from the last official police statement. “Kidnapper.” That is one person.

My source did not know everything except the name of the suspect who he said he had surveillance over a 10 year period. A lot of people believed and still believe there were multiple perps.

If one rules out the obvious suspects and there is no one left it follows the perp was unknown then.

I won’t name him as that would be irresponsible but it is whatI believe at this time.

But I won’t be devastated if I am proved wrong. I just want it solved.