- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 6,189
- Reaction score
- 50,439
So what did the judge sentence him--95-123 months with credit for time served while waiting?
Yes! That is correct. 7.92 yrs to 10.25 yrs
So what did the judge sentence him--95-123 months with credit for time served while waiting?
Yep, 95-123 months including time served.
And Raven took his final statement to proclaim that he is somehow the victim here - he didn't get a fair trial! The second one wouldn't be fair either! He's the victim and HAS to take this plea!
Quick, everybody play your sad violins for the true victim in this murder case! :banghead:
So what did the judge sentence him--95-123 months with credit for time served while waiting?
I'm thinking the Alford Plea changes the way sentences can be applied.
Considering what the Statutes say, his sentence -- I'm glad to say -- is worse. Still not enuff, but at least he's gonna be in a state :jail: .
![]()
I this going on today? I have been busy this morning and just saw a tweet.
Okay, but still why offer a deal when the state was sooooo close to getting a conviction the last time?
The vote was 11-1 Guilty, If not for one lone juror, Raven Abaroa would never see the light of day again.
I don't understand what the state was thinking and no one has an explanation.
The state was probably thinking --
1. Yeah we were so close last time but what if there's another hung jury again. Durham can't afford a third trial & we'd have to let him go.
2. The guy is so guilty but there's no guarantee we'll get a conviction and we only get one more shot because of budget pressure. A plea is better than nothing.
3. It's expensive to try a case and we have a lot of other cases to take to trial.
4. Taxpayer pressure to not waste money and an always-limited budget is forcing us to clear the dockets, if we can. And a plea will keep this guy off the streets for some amount of years and he'll always have a felony record.