Maybe in 75 years from now?Unfortunately I don't trust anything this government does. A secure locked room? I guess they'll release that entirely one day too! IMO
Maybe in 75 years from now?Unfortunately I don't trust anything this government does. A secure locked room? I guess they'll release that entirely one day too! IMO
If that's him and if he was armed then, why did they just let him go?I've justed watched the video below on the main BBC Ten O'Clock News on BBC1.
Ironically, if Alex Pretti had been arrested for this, he'd still be alive.
![]()
TNM | EXCLUSIVE: Man who appears to be Alex Pretti filmed in altercation with federal agents
EXCLUSIVE: On January 13th, The News Movement filmed a man who appears to be Alex Pretti interacting with federal immigration agents. Our footage was analyzed by the BBC, whose facial recognition technology confirmed his identity to a 97% degree of accuracy. We were filming a documentary about...www.thenewsmovement.com
There is no right to physically obstruct a federal agent performing official duties. To me Mr. Pretti was obstructing.
It's been stated that one of the ICE shooters appears to be from Texas and was dressed in clothing unlike the others... cowboy boots etc. I have considered that the administration may be offering pay to play an ICE agent deals to well-connected wealthy donors and their progeny. It reminds me of the illegal big game hunting reports I've seen. They are brought in, and now whisked away. Administrative leave or sanctuary?How can it be appropriate? Their names are still unknown to MN LE and the state's citizens. If the players were changed to MN local police being the shooters, would not MN and the nation know who the actors were? Would local or state LE not be named? There's a standard of LE investigation that's not being met by the DHS/ICE investigating themselves, behind closed doors. MN's governnent, state and local, are concerned that evidence was taken and removed with no care or accountability being shown. DHS/ICE have assured by those actions, IMO, that if warranted no prosecution could be undertaken. Is that the correct way of investigating, of professional LE, of seeking answers and justice? Again all rhetorical question as I think the answers are quite clear. No
AJMO
I've seen what she considered to be assaultsadly we all have
It's hard to say.Is she talking about 26 not 16 , arrests made yesterday by the Mapke Grove PD? Protesters were outside of a suites place where ICE are staying and property damage and escalating violence changed the situation, so police rightly stepped in?
![]()
Maple Grove hotel protests lead to arrest, charges for 26 people involved
The Maple Grove Police Department says 26 people have been arrested following a protest outside the SpringHill Suites where federal agents were believed to be staying.www.fox9.com
Wouldn't trained, capable LE have pinned his arms behind his back and cuffed him? There were enough of them in the pile on.They had him pinned down to the ground. All they needed to do and should have been trained to do, was to search him properly. Not to shot hin ten times in the back.
MOO![]()
yep rather than address the points I made when you asked me a question. To show me that you do comprehendOk, well that is pretty offensive. But that is ok. I'll just end it at that.
What are your points? I am really just trying to avoid an argument.yep rather than address the points I made when you asked me a question. To show me that you do comprehend
omg they're not necessarily supporting the amendment, they're supporting equality under the Constitution. How can you not comprehend this? You're an attorney aren't you? Critical thinking in the US is an endangered species.
It’s an exercise in futility.What are your points? I am really just trying to avoid an argument.
so you didn't read my answer to your question and you want me to reiterate them?What are your points? I am really just trying to avoid an argument.
Exactly.It’s an exercise in futility.
First time seeing that video - wow! He wasn’t a peaceful observer that time. He should have been taken into custody. imoI've justed watched the video below on the main BBC Ten O'Clock News on BBC1.
Ironically, if Alex Pretti had been arrested for this, he'd still be alive.
![]()
TNM | EXCLUSIVE: Man who appears to be Alex Pretti filmed in altercation with federal agents
EXCLUSIVE: On January 13th, The News Movement filmed a man who appears to be Alex Pretti interacting with federal immigration agents. Our footage was analyzed by the BBC, whose facial recognition technology confirmed his identity to a 97% degree of accuracy. We were filming a documentary about...www.thenewsmovement.com
I agree, he should have been arrested for his actions in this video, there was very clear damage to the officers car. He was also armed here. So why didn’t they arrest him? Why didn’t this incident, where he’s being violent and distruptive, end with him being shot? Could it be because these officers knew how to de-escalate the situation and defuse a threat but the others didn’t?First time seeing that video - wow! He wasn’t a peaceful observer that time. He should have been taken into custody. imo
Your comment was "omg they're not necessarily supporting the amendment, they're supporting equality under the Constitution. How can you not comprehend this? You're an attorney aren't you? Critical thinking in the US is an endangered species." I did not understand it. How can you support the Constitution, but not the amendment, which is a part of the amendment? I don't understand the "equality" comment? I would love to have a genuine conversation. Can you further explain what you meant here? Are you saying the amendment is not supportable? or are you saying some are not given equal rights? I am just not understanding your question I guess.so you didn't read my answer to your question and you want me to reiterate them?
Fair enough I see you are not interested in a genuine discussion and just want to gaslight me
You'll look for any reason to justify his execution. Shameful. Not sure why you believe this is real. I don't buy it for a second.First time seeing that video - wow! He wasn’t a peaceful observer that time. He should have been taken into custody. imo
They are pointing out the facts. You aren't interested in genuine discussion and are gaslighting people.Your comment was "omg they're not necessarily supporting the amendment, they're supporting equality under the Constitution. How can you not comprehend this? You're an attorney aren't you? Critical thinking in the US is an endangered species." I did not understand it. How can you support the Constitution, but not the amendment, which is a part of the amendment? I don't understand the "equality" comment? I would love to have a genuine conversation. Can you further explain what you meant here? Are you saying the amendment is not supportable? or are you saying some are not given equal rights? I am just not understanding your question I guess.
100% accurate.so you didn't read my answer to your question and you want me to reiterate them?
Fair enough I see you are not interested in a genuine discussion and just want to gaslight me