No proof that Amy was ever at the gas station.I've come to the conclusion that this was a "crime of opportunity." I believe Amy was either abducted by a random stranger or by someone she knew that happened to see her alone at the gas station.
No proof that Amy was ever at the gas station.I've come to the conclusion that this was a "crime of opportunity." I believe Amy was either abducted by a random stranger or by someone she knew that happened to see her alone at the gas station.
Good question. However, this case happened in 1989. Megan's law wasn't passed until 1994. Minnesota began registering sex offenders in 1991. So there would be no way for the family or anyone helping them to know who the offenders in the area were. It is hard to say if the local police had an internal list or not, but AFAIK, no Maple Grove Police are participating in this thread.I've read every post on this thread. I didn't see anything mentioned about checking out the local sex offenders.
There's no proof she wasn't.No proof that Amy was ever at the gas station.
I've come to the conclusion that this was a "crime of opportunity." I believe Amy was either abducted by a random stranger or by someone she knew that happened to see her alone at the gas station.
Amy doesn't have a stepfather. Marshall is Amy's legal father. The last public statement by police is that they have no suspects, and the family is cooperating. I don't know how common it is for police to make public statements that they have "cleared" someone in an open case. I can't recall any times I have heard that myself.Age-Progession Picture Of Woman Missing For 22 Years
Here's another article..does anyone know if her stepfather, who last seen her, if he was ever cleared?
No proof that she wasn't either.No proof that Amy was ever at the gas station.
That is not surprising since this case happened in 1989. Minnesota didn't start registering sex offenders until 1991 and Megan's law wasn't in place until 1994. Don't know if some local police departments kept track of their local offenders, but it is easy for people to move into and out of jurisdictions.I've read every post on this thread. I didn't see anything mentioned about checking out the local sex offenders.
True that sex offenders weren't registered at that time; however, I suspect the police would be aware of most of them.That is not surprising since this case happened in 1989. Minnesota didn't start registering sex offenders until 1991 and Megan's law wasn't in place until 1994. Don't know if some local police departments kept track of their local offenders, but it is easy for people to move into and out of jurisdictions.
The thing to remember here is that there is very little information coming out of the Maple Grove pd regarding this case. There is probably a LOT that they have done that they have not mentioned...<modsnip - discussing other members is not allowed>
Amy has DNA, according to Doe Network.I did a search on Namus and found two female UIDs from the same county that Amy went missing from.
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.www.namus.gov
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.www.namus.gov
Both are partial female skeletal remains, and therefore there is very little to go on. Is anyone able to see whether there is DNA for these UIDs and for Amy on Namus?
Thank you. Unfortunately I cannot check this as I do not have a NAMUS account, because I am not in the US.Amy has DNA, according to Doe Network.
Since the two cases you posted aren't in Doe Network, and NamUs doesn't show us the DNA status anymore, the only way to really find out is to submit them to NamUs as a potential match. Or log in to see if she's been ruled out, if you haven't done that already.
I would hope that they would be aware of some, for sure. But probably not of every person with a record moving in to and out of the area the way they would be these days.True that sex offenders weren't registered at that time; however, I suspect the police would be aware of most of them.
I suspect Amy was seen by either someone she knew or someone random who saw her alone in the car and took advantage of the opportunity. If she knew the person, she might have gone with them willingly. Depending on how and where the car was parked, another car might have pulled alongside and a passenger could have pulled her from one car to the other in seconds without anyone noticing.
Usually men do use the restrooms a lot faster than women; even men that washed their hands well usually are a little bit faster. But you know sometimes one has to do more than urination.
I agree. It doesn't seem likely that a cop would give information on an active case to a random person at Panera. However, I was once talking to a BCA employee at a conference and mentioned Amy's case. The BCA employee's face softened considerably, and they said "That family has been treated so badly."Sorry, can you name or describe this cop. Most officers who worked on the case were professionals who wouldn't disclose information about an active case to a random person at Panera, even during retirement.
Did they really work on the case? Were they a cop? Detective? I know one who gave me the creepy feels, who may have let things slip to try and get something, but otherwise I can't see many working on the case talking about this generally.
If the extended family wants to believe differently than Amy's mother and father, they have that right.Found this obituary for Marshall Middens’s father. Marshall is the husband of Amy’s mom.
![]()
Butler Funeral Homes & Cremation Tribute Center group
See all locations in the Butler family. View obituaries and services, get directions and get in touch 24/7.www.boardmansmith.com
In the obituary, it says that Amy proceeded the grandfather in death. Interesting because Susan, Amy’s mom, says she believes Amy is alive.
<modsnip: No personalizing> I know that Marshall and Susan didn’t have to approve the obituary prior to publication.
Also <modsnip> I said Susan’s husband not Amy’s dad.
Avid supporter of the facts and finding Amy. People only interpret suggestions they don't like to be bias. I just feel like when one theory has had nearly 40 years of attention and it has produced nothing, maybe it's time to look at another theory.@Renu (Verified insider - Amy Sue Pagnac case) was last seen: Dec 11, 2015
@sguru26 (Amy's sister, never verified) was last seen: Feb 27, 2013
@spagnac (Amy's mother, never verified) was last seen: Aug 23, 2015
ETA: I had just spent the wee hours of this morning going back over this thread. These, along with another member (Whisper2112 was last seen: Jun 15, 2017) were the only people who purported to have insider knowledge. Whisper seemed to be an avid supporter of the family, though not claiming to be related in any fashion. Perplexing.
If you go back in this particular thread the family hasn't been cleared ( this was stated by Amy's sister)Amy doesn't have a stepfather. Marshall is Amy's legal father. The last public statement by police is that they have no suspects, and the family is cooperating. I don't know how common it is for police to make public statements that they have "cleared" someone in an open case. I can't recall any times I have heard that myself.
I will say his reports of her sneaking off to drink booze and have sex .. seem unsubstantiated.. as I have never seen that in any of what I've read of the case.New YouTube Short Video Podcast