Here's the link to Theo Bronhorst's version of events:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ant-next-but-couldnt-find-one-big-enough.html
He said it was Palmer (with his bow & arrow) who finished off Cecil when they found him 40 hours later.
Bronhorst also stated the following:
"I could not have seen the collar at night. We would never shoot a collared animal. I was devastated, and so was the client, we were both upset, and I panicked and took it off and put it in a tree. I should have taken it to Parks [the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority], I admit that.
So we did what had to be done. We took the head and skin, as the client had paid for the trophy." I went to Parks and reported what had happened. I wish I had taken the collar."
If Palmer was devastated that the lion he killed was collared, why did he still want the head and skin as trophies? Shouldn't they have left the body intact and then reported the mishap? That would seem to be proper procedure. Hmmm.