JerseyGirl
Retired Forum Coordinator
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 55,636
- Reaction score
- 192,988
B: If the officers intent was to inflict pain…
S: Not the officers intent, sir. What you said is that it was unlikely to produce pain & that's why it wasn't a use a force. You now just said it could produce pain..Would you agree that what we're seeing here is a use of force?
Brodd responded that what is pictured "could be a use of force.”
https://twitter.com/anavilastra/status/1382050414422540290?s=21
S: Would you accept that the Minneapolis Police Department, generally defines force to include restraint?
B: It can.
S: Again, particularly if it's restraint that could result in some sort of injury or pain.
B: Yes.
S: Not the officers intent, sir. What you said is that it was unlikely to produce pain & that's why it wasn't a use a force. You now just said it could produce pain..Would you agree that what we're seeing here is a use of force?
Brodd responded that what is pictured "could be a use of force.”
https://twitter.com/anavilastra/status/1382050414422540290?s=21
S: Would you accept that the Minneapolis Police Department, generally defines force to include restraint?
B: It can.
S: Again, particularly if it's restraint that could result in some sort of injury or pain.
B: Yes.
Last edited: