- Joined
- Feb 4, 2010
- Messages
- 1,691
- Reaction score
- 1,152
Just pushing around the puzzle pieces of Jacob's case in my mind for the umpteenth time -- Since DNA was collected from Jared's case, and DR submitted his DNA, we can assume, I would think, that those two cases are not connected. Jared was let go, but Jacob was not (or least to the best of our knowledge he was not). Jacob, Joshua still missing. If DR was not directly involved in these cases, could it still be that his tie to St. John's is significant? The perpetrator may have been able to get away with these abductions because he had help, i.e. a spotter to give him a heads up that, for example, Joshua is walking alone across the campus. Coincidentally, someone called in a tip to a hotline that they saw a jogger heading towards St. John's campus around midnight, the same time Joshua left a card party and was returning to his dorm. Could the same possible spotter/accomplice have alerted the predator to Jacob riding his bike with brother and friends to mini mart? Predator gets to the location and waits. Could there be additional accomplices -- yes, it is very possible. My guess is these cretins were paid off by the main predator and maybe the spotter got a little $$ out of it. Does it all sound crazy and impossible? It's not -- at least not in my opinion. In trying to find the common denominator(s) between Jacob and Joshua -- it is DR and St. John's. They haven't been able to convict DR of anything -- maybe it's because he didn't do the deed but he possibly had a role in it. How deeply can we explore this? Not as deeply as I would like, given the secretive nature and outright lies of St. John's. Why weren't the alibis of the sex offenders living on the campus looked into when Jacob was abducted? Isn't that the norm -- to at least check the alibis of local sex offenders? But wait, let us not forget that some of the monks with the most extensive histories of sexual abuse of minors were still being hidden/protected by the abbot and his minions. Surely the FBI would not have discounted this angle just because it was an abbey? How will we ever know? Did the perpetrator take these secrets to his grave? Even if he did, are there other who may know of his deviant exploits. I think so. How could one obtain any proof? Ask the sheriff to see all his records on St. John's university, including the dialogue that occurred between abbey officials at the time Jacob and Joshua went missing, along with the sheriff's findings from the search of certain monks' rooms. This has all been discussed here numerous times. I'm just looking for the missing puzzle pieces so that we can at least formulate a fleshed out theory. As I've said many times, I don't have a horse in this race, but I am a fan of Dr. Immelman's so I tend to see the merit in his analysis of the links between these cases.