August 27, 2010
Katy Zillmer
staff writer
A new trial request from Nicole Beecroft, the now 21-year-old convicted of first-degree murder for the death of her newborn baby in 2007, was denied July 20.
Washington County District Judge Mary E. Hannon, who presided over Beecroft's murder trial, handed down the order denying the motion for a new trial. Beecroft requested her conviction be reversed and a new trial ordered, arguing she did not have a complete defense during the court proceedings in November 2008.
snip
Kelly Mills, the principal assistant medical examiner for Washington County who performed the autopsy, concluded the baby was born alive and died from multiple stab wounds.
Defense attorneys, however, argued the infant was stillborn.
Although air in the infant's lungs and stomach, defense lawyers presented several different theories to refute that meant she was alive. They said the infant was born alive but died before she was stabbed; she inhaled air in the birth canal but was stillborn; or the air entered her stomach and lungs when the infant was stabbed, according to Hannon's order.
snip
Now that Hannon issued her decision on the post-conviction hearing, Beecroft will forward her appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court.
"It's totally out of our hands right now," Johnson said. "It's going to be up to the Supreme Court to decide what happens to her ... we expect the verdict is going to be upheld," he said.
Much more at link:
http://www.oakdalelakeelmoreview.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&SubSectionID=233&ArticleID=6545
On Friday October 21, 2011, at 9:00 am, Ms. Beecroft was back in court in Washington County for an evidentiary hearingon whether she would be getting a new trial. I have not seen the court ruling on it yet.
The difference between stabbing the baby while alive and stabbing a stillborn baby is simple. Murder versus tampering with a corpse/concealing a birth. Life without parole or up to 5 years for concealing the birth. Tampering with a corpse is a misdemeanor in Minnesota.
As I was reading the different posts on Ms. Beecroft, I saw one that was speaking about her being held in an undisclosed state institution, followed by a comment about Shakopee being the only women's prison in Minnesota. To shed light on that is simple. She was caught planning an escape with her brother and was put into Ad Seg, awaiting an out of state transfer to either Oklahoma or Nebraska. The running joke was that if she thought being in prison in Minnesota was bad, she wasn't going to like life in either of those two states prisons.
During her brief stay in Shakopee, she was not liked at all. The women detested her. They were willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, until her mouth started running about the crime she was convicted of. Very disturbing stuff came out of her mouth. She became known as 'B.K.'. I am sure you can figure that one out. She had the doctors in the jail she as held at before the sentencing believing she was mentallin ill. Even in the prison she tried to get them to believe she was mentallly ill. She is not at all mentally ill. She is a girl who is MALINGERING. That is it and that is all. There were some doozies in there.
All just an FYI. Have good days!!!
But how is she caring about herself and selfishly taking care of herself by stabbing the baby so many times and throwing the baby away? The selfish only caring about herself course of action would be to take advantage of the 3-day law and get on with her life, never to be bothered by the baby again. The mentally ill course of action would be to do what she did and end up in prison and ruin the rest of her life.
I am interested to hear more about what law enforcement finds out.
The murder was horrific & she never shed a tear, no remorse / no nothing / possibly hostility for her Mom. The Dad of Nikki had went to the house yrs ago & had a gun & was going to kill them all. So maybe the defense will be insanity / using the Dad as an example.
Someone somewhere else made a good point, IMO. What if she was raped? It has been said she probably knew who the father was, but that doesn't have to be her boyfriend.
Even if she was raped she did not have the 'right' to do this to an innocent baby. Don't even try to tell me I am sticking up for her. With what she did, that would be impossible.
But if this child was conceived through rape, possibly violent, to me that would be an explanation of her behaviour. Again: it would not be an excuse.
Yeah, I don't care. I understand you're not excusing her behavior, but there are many other options. Dang, a dirty grimy trash can is a better option.Just...sad. RIP baby.
Sent from my LG-VM696 using Tapatalk 2