With all due respect reedus when the cops stayed away that is when the looting ect happens.
With all due respect as well, I believe the worst of the looting and the QT being burned etc. occurred when the militarized police were present.
With all due respect reedus when the cops stayed away that is when the looting ect happens.
What do y'all think about the complaints regarding the $135/hour fees for sunshine requests? There's lot of anger over this right now.
I think we all would agree that disclosure and transparency are desirable here, so there's definitely validity to the arguments that waiver of fees is in the public interest. OTOH, Ferguson is spending beaucoup bucks on police overtime and other costs associated with this situation, and they're granting amnesty and cancelling traffic fines wholesale, and their property tax revenue is most likely on a sharply downward trajectory, so it's not like they have tons of extra money sitting around.
As to the fee itself. The headlines that they're charging 10 times a city worker's salary is just melodrama. They've quoted AP an hourly rate of $135/hour, which is ten times the hourly wage of the lowest-paid entry-level worker in the city clerk's office. So I discount the headline, but I do look at the $135/hour charge.
$135 seems high, on its face. Then I look at what's included in that.
Missouri statutes set the per-page copying fee at 10 cents per page.
Fees for duplicating time (someone to run the copier) are "not to exceed the average hourly rate of pay for clerical staff of the public governmental body."
Research time required for fulfilling records requests may be charged at the actual cost of research time.
Source: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C600-699/6100000026.HTM
Obviously, the bulk of the $135/hour would have to be research time. That would include skilled IT people to fashion and conduct the searches to pull the relevant emails & other requested documents from databases, as well as lawyers & other professionals to review the documents, determine what's relevant to the request, determine what should be exempted from the request, and determine which part(s) need to be redacted. There would probably need to be time spent reviewing state law and case law in determining exemptions and redactions. When you get lawyers involved -- and they have to get lawyers involved -- "actual costs" can easily skyrocket.
So, I end up undecided whether $135 is unreasonable. A Google search doesn't enlighten me as to what average sunshine request fees are or how often fees are waived. What do y'all think?
So I guess they're going to be allowed to scream all night? Thanks to Johnson?
It's exorbitant but they're not the only ones to do it. I would be curious if they sent the same type of bill to everyone for the robbery records.
bbmIf I were a Ferguson LEO I'd be sending my resume to the four corners of the US to get the hell out of Dodge ASAP. When your superiors cut your legs out from under you time and time again, all while you are standing exposed to gunfire, it's time to move on.
And I'm sure the citizens of Ferguson who are trying to sleep, get home from the late shift, get to work, let their babies sleep are sooooooo happy that Johnson has come in to take care of things. I mean, it's so nice and peaceful now, eh? Totaly disgusted.
Give in, give in, give in. This suspending of laws is making me sick.
It is so frustrating hearing some of the logic being used. Like the guy saying it could have happened to 'any black person' just walking home from the store. NO. not unless that person bumrushes a cop and punches him, and tries to take his gun....
What do y'all think about the complaints regarding the $135/hour fees for sunshine requests? There's lot of anger over this right now.
I think we all would agree that disclosure and transparency are desirable here, so there's definitely validity to the arguments that waiver of fees is in the public interest. OTOH, Ferguson is spending beaucoup bucks on police overtime and other costs associated with this situation, and they're granting amnesty and cancelling traffic fines wholesale, and their property tax revenue is most likely on a sharply downward trajectory, so it's not like they have tons of extra money sitting around.
As to the fee itself. The headlines that they're charging 10 times a city worker's salary is just melodrama. They've quoted AP an hourly rate of $135/hour, which is ten times the hourly wage of the lowest-paid entry-level worker in the city clerk's office. So I discount the headline, but I do look at the $135/hour charge.
$135 seems high, on its face. Then I look at what's included in that.
Missouri statutes set the per-page copying fee at 10 cents per page.
Fees for duplicating time (someone to run the copier) are "not to exceed the average hourly rate of pay for clerical staff of the public governmental body."
Research time required for fulfilling records requests may be charged at the actual cost of research time.
Source: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C600-699/6100000026.HTM
Obviously, the bulk of the $135/hour would have to be research time. That would include skilled IT people to fashion and conduct the searches to pull the relevant emails & other requested documents from databases, as well as lawyers & other professionals to review the documents, determine what's relevant to the request, determine what should be exempted from the request, and determine which part(s) need to be redacted. There would probably need to be time spent reviewing state law and case law in determining exemptions and redactions. When you get lawyers involved -- and they have to get lawyers involved -- "actual costs" can easily skyrocket.
So, I end up undecided whether $135 is unreasonable. A Google search doesn't enlighten me as to what average sunshine request fees are or how often fees are waived. What do y'all think?
What First Amendment right gives people the right to break the law despite repeated requests to comply? (Talking about some of the junk coming out of this reporter's mouth...their First Amendment rights are being violated by the cops removing them from the middle of the street, doncha know).
Gunshots but nobody is moving? Cops or protesters? that's kinda a weird reaction, I'd be running out of the area quickly!!
:laughing:No matter how the GJ comes back you just know these " protesters" are going to tear Ferguson apart! Since Ron Johnson has such a laid back attitude towards them I vote he should be the one to walk out there and tell the protesters what the GJ decided. Hopefully EVERY officer there will need an emergency bathroom break when it happens!! Let RJ deal with what he helped create.
I am glad she has her priorities straight, leave the baby at home with a babysitter. so she can go to the protest and possibly get arrested.
Now they are trying to say that the COPS were the ones shooting at themselves...:sure:
Whats interesting to me is that I would think the majority of cases where the FOIA are made, the request comes from the press, especially in this case.
I could be way off, but I would also think that the majority of instances when an average citizen makes a Request for this sort of information, it would be info they'd have access to legally anyway, therefore, no need for a FIOA.
Isn't that really sad that they have to ask![]()
Is Johnson running this show? If so, he is as clueless as Belmar on how to handle crowds. Frankly, if I were in their shoes and they told me to get on the sidewalk, I'd get on the sidewalk on the PD side of the street. Now we're going to see an increase in the violence against people who have only been talking. Yeah, ramping up violence against people who haven't been violent isn't winning many points. Whipping out your baton like you're billy badagainst people who haven't been violent isn't impressing anyone. But hey. You did manage to arrest a priest on his knees. Well done.
It appears there's nothing that would make the protestors believe the shooting is justified. Unreasonable overreaction seems to be the rule. At least if (when) there is rioting after the GJ's decision, there should not be a question about whether the announcement was handled poorly and triggered it. There is no way to announce it and get a reasonable response, IMO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.