First paragraph...I will again use my hypothetical. If I walk up to a cop, punch him in the face and lay down in the street with my arms spread wide, hands open, showing I have no weapon and surrendering to arrest, that cop has no right to shoot me under the law. I completely understand that this is an extreme example but I don't know how else to get my point across that MB could have been a sole instigator and




and felon and sucker punched DW, but if he had surrendered himself to arrest prior to those fatal shots, there is no justification because the use of deadly force was not immediately necessary to effect the arrest. That is not condoning MB's actions at all. I hardly believe MB is a saint. But if an arrest was able to be effectuated without the use of deadly force, it doesn't matter how gross or how wrong MB's actions were previously, he should have been arrested.
Please tell me where I said anything that remotely said the cop deserved to be assaulted? If I said that, I will apologize. Do I think the cop was rude? Probably by my definition of rude, but maybe he needed to be or maybe that isn't considered rude by others. But that doesn't come anywhere near saying it warrants someone assaulting an officer.
I think either I haven't been clear in my position or you are misunderstanding or misstating my position.