HarvestMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 3,120
- Reaction score
- 1,240
I am just thrilled that this action has or is in process of leaving the area of the highway. Worried about protests at jail and the potential for things to be less than peaceful. I am all for peaceful demonstration but in addition to getting clear on "what is your ask?" someone needs to really explain that every ask will not be immediately met with "okey dokey, so mote it be"
Change is what people seem to be asking for and that is fine but what change? how will it be made, with specificity? By whom? Replaced with what instead? Is that reasonable and doable? What is a reasonable timeline for that change to be instituted?
We have raised a generation of microwave and highspeed net service individuals who don't seem to have a very clear concept that change takes time and must be undertaken carefully or anarchy rules. So for those who say the protesters are not asking for total anarchy, what are the protestors thinking they are accomplishing by continuing to demand change but allowing for no time or plan with which to institute said change?
They are in the beginning stages. With this freeway closure attempt I'm guessing that they have seasoned police killing protestors there giving ideas and information. They need to organize after their outpouring of anger and compile a list of demands for change. This is a long long tiresome process, and eventually needs to be taken to their city /county/state government systems.