I think you make a legitimate observation, which is why I have been harping about proper leadership in urban communities. These out of town leaders seem to have less sense than the residents, they come in and fan the flames creating more animosity, then they will leave the residents to deal with the fallout. They need a leader who will come in and solve the internal problems within the community first (education, crime, poverty), then find out how much of an external problem (LE and government) they have. You can have an all-black PD and government who all fit the mold of MLK himself, does anyone really think that is the elixir that solves the internal problems? I think this is why these communities continue to look like war zones as you mentioned, they are in a cycle where everyone else is the problem.
It's funny how we argue back and forth about the whole walking down the middle of the street thing. Is that a big deal? Heavens no, it really isn't. But, when the community is full of people who would rather get out of the middle of the street without being asked, THAT is when you have progress. Those are choices that show people want improvement. If you refuse to move, it tells me people want struggle or want those around them to change, but they have no interest in changing themselves.
Sorry, just thinking out loud here.
Great post frydaddy. Agree on so many levels. I think that the proper leadership will not be heard of. I think the proper leaders will quietly go about their business of leading. They won't be the ones on the front lines shouting "Hands up! Don't shoot!" and they won't be the ones to be vocally criticizing the protests. They will have empathy for all sides. They absolutely have got to on the one hand improve the education of the community. Have got to lead a greater percentage of the populous into becoming assets to the community instead of criminals. At the same time, I KNOW they have problems within their LE and governments and they can work towards fixing those things at the same time. I think there are small steps heading that direction now. When things first flared up, I thought French might be such a person, but he's disappointed me on so many levels.
I also agree about the out of town leaders and what they've done/will do. I will add someone like Shahid to the list, who frankly, to me has been looking forward to this day for decades. To me, it's sick to almost want something like the MB/OW incident to happen so he can get that confrontation with the system that he's always yearned for.
I also get what you're saying with your example of the street too, but I also think that that is one of the reasons why progress has to be made on both the internal and external at the same time. I don't know how to say this without it getting whacked or being given a timeout but I will try. It is going to be very hard to convince a community to be more respectful of authority and move to the side of the street if even one among that authority is of the mentality that it is ok to make a statement such as "You don't understand the n****r mentality."(I changed one word in the text. The actual word is "c**n" but I didn't know if people would figure that word out). By allowing one such person to remain in a place of authority, condemns all of that authority in the eyes of the populous. So 100% agree that work has to be done internally but I think it can be and needs to be done in conjunction with and contemporaneously with the external change.