AuburnTxTiger
Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
- Messages
- 507
- Reaction score
- 0
Apparently his arms weren't in the air. IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
For sure MB was not shot in the back!
Apparently his arms weren't in the air. IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Apparently his arms weren't in the air. IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/1...least-6-times.html?smid=tw-bna&_r=0&referrer=
One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Browns skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the familys request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.
So there you have it, he was NOT shot in the back. It seems he was facing the officer and likely charging towards him. The initial bullets were to the right arm which apparently did not stop him.
Wilson, the guy with the gun, was afraid of a kid with no gun? Please...
Standing with them?
They're tucked safely somewhere after fanning the flames.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No more than it supports the theory that he went down to his knees in surrender. Moreover, Baden found no evidence that the gunshots were fired at close range.
Jesse Jackon on CNN called the autopsy report by Dr Baden "provocative" and "bound to escalate tensions" (already the spin has begun)
Dr. Baden provided a diagram of the entry wounds, and noted that the six shots produced numerous wounds. Some of the bullets entered and exited several times, including one that left at least five different wounds.
Im wondering why we're hearing about the 2nd autopsy but not the first.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.