The plot thickens. Looks like IA bothced the toxicology draws under Garrity doctrine (intentional?).
In the letter, released Tuesday, Gardner says a police lieutenant erroneously told her office that a hospital would not honor a search warrant for the officers' blood. Gardner wrote that hospitals commonly accept search warrants in criminal cases.
The letter says urine and breath tests were later performed, but not a blood test, which can be more exact. They later learned that the samples had been obtained by internal affairs in a way that may block their use in a criminal prosecution. Officers generally must comply with internal affairs investigations, but that compelled testimony or evidence can't be used against them in court.
Gardner said the testing "appears as an obstructionist tactic to prevent us from understanding the state of the officers during the commission of this alleged crime."
St. Louis prosecutor questions whether police blocked investigation into officer's shooting
Additionally, I learned today that her husband is assigned to District 4 via SLPD and he was on-duty at the time of the incident. He is not listed on their wedding registry.
https://www.theknot.com/registry/co...eventYear=2018&reset=true&track=true&offset=0
Persons Directly Involved:
Katlyn Alix, 24 Cpl. US ARMY Reserve '12-'16.
Nate Hendren, 29, Cpl. USMC '08-'12.
Sgt. Richard Hellmeier
Other Persons:
Colonel John W. Hayden
Judge James Edwards
Lt. Green
Lt. Brown
Det. Strong
Atty Kimberly Gardner
Atty Scott Rosenblum[/QUOTE/