MO - Sherrill Levitt, 47, Suzie Streeter, 19, & Stacy McCall, 18, Springfield, 7 June 1992 #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
Questions:
  • Does anyone have any idea how much and/or what physical evidence LE has preserved from the 3MW case?
  • Was any of the evidence collected ever submitted for DNA testing?
I know the scene at SL's home was horribly contaminated from everybody and their cousin traipsing through it prior to LE being contacted, but it would still be important for LE to have preserved as much evidence from the home as possible.

JK's account has always sounded completely unbelievable to me, from start to finish.

JMO.

I always wondered if they looked at the cars for physical evidence. I know they might need to keep things to themselves so they can catch the killer/killers. The house was like grand central station that day who knows who touched what. That scene itself is weird. I agree with you about JK's story. Something is off.
 
  • #462
Irish, why did Asher commit to Dusty and Mike's results, but not Joe's? Twice. Once in July 1992 and again in September 1992?
 
  • #463
I am saying that Asher wouldn't commit to his results, one way or another.

All you have is a document saying "The party appears to be truthful" (paraphrasing) printed on a piece of paper. And guess what, that's all it's worth.

Than why were you pressing he did not pass before even though that was NOT true? Why did it matter to you then, but not now???
 
  • #464
Irish, why did Asher commit to Dusty and Mike's results, but not Joe's? Twice. Once in July 1992 and again in September 1992?

I’m not Asher, that is a question for him.
 
  • #465
Referring to how could a single perp control three women please don't forget Cary Stayner who abducted three at one time from a motel room. A gun to coerce then duct tape for one victim to secure the other two's hands and mouths before being secured herself make this easily possible. Then everyone is walked to the vehicle used.
 
  • #466
I am saying that Asher wouldn't commit to his results, one way or another.

All you have is a document saying "The party appears to be truthful" (paraphrasing) printed on a piece of paper. And guess what, that's all it's worth.

Asher was unprofessional.
 
  • #467
I’m not Asher, that is a question for him.
So the cops that administered the polygraph. Hutcheson/Carrington (I forget who) are the arbiters of truth but lead detective at the time, Asher, isn't?

Help me get this straight for the record.
 
  • #468
So the cops that administered the polygraph. Hutcheson/Carrington (I forget who) are the arbiters of truth but lead detective at the time, Asher, isn't?

Help me get this straight for the record.

All I said was I don’t know why Asher did that because I DON’T. I’ve never spoken to the man.
 
  • #469
All I said was I don’t know why Asher did that because I DON’T. I’ve never spoken to the man.

Let me put it his way:

Do you believe it was possible that Joe was in town? Or do you take his word, knowing he had a 100k bond (for a two-bit cemetery crime from PD/county with very limited funds), knowing he was a snitch, knowing he threw Mike under the bus? Why is his word, in the biggest case in Springfield history, in that moment, truthful?
 
  • #470
Referring to how could a single perp control three women please don't forget Cary Stayner who abducted three at one time from a motel room. A gun to coerce then duct tape for one victim to secure the other two's hands and mouths before being secured herself make this easily possible. Then everyone is walked to the vehicle used.

Cory Stayner did have an advantage over the women he abducted, in that they were on vacation and he worked there. This may or maynot have been a reason they complied. Even if you escape in that situation you might end up lost. That sounds like a horror movie. It's not impossible to restrain three women especially if they think you are just robbing them.
 
  • #471
Let me put it his way:

Do you believe it was possible that Joe was in town? Or do you take his word, knowing he had a 100k bond (for a two-bit cemetery crime from PD/county with very limited funds), knowing he was a snitch, knowing he threw Mike under the bus? Why is his word, in the biggest case in Springfield history, in that moment, truthful?

I believe the police looked into it and found no connection because they gave him a plea deal for the vandalism. I believe they changed his bond to higher because he did not come back and that looks suspicious and wanted to further question him. I believe if they thought for a moment he was a part of there biggest crime that was still not solved they would not of done that.
 
  • #472
Cory Stayner did have an advantage over the women he abducted, in that they were on vacation and he worked there. This may or maynot have been a reason they complied. Even if you escape in that situation you might end up lost. That sounds like a horror movie. It's not impossible to restrain three women especially if they think you are just robbing them.

The women didn't know Cary from Adam's housecat even though he did work for the motel. If the Springfield Three knew their abductor they'd likely comply with his demands never suspecting until too late that they wouldn't get out of this alive.
 
  • #473
I believe the police looked into it and found no connection because they gave him a plea deal for the vandalism. I believe they changed his bond to higher because he did not come back and that looks suspicious and wanted to further question him. I believe if they thought for a moment he was a part of there biggest crime that was still not solved they would not of done that.
Found no connection or found no proof (i.e. bodies)?

The law doesn't work that way. His vandalism trial doesn't have anything to do with 3MW as far as sentencing, etc. His lawyer would have a field day if the judge wanted to give a harsh sentence over suspected guilt in another crime.

Ever wonder why Joe's case was separated from Mike and Dusty's? Even with Dusty and Mike using a different lawyer? And Mike using Joe's lawyer?

Why did Joe and Mike's lawyer (both represented by Stephen Lada) agree to opposite sentences? Things that make you go hmmmmmm.

Couldn't be that Joe was a CI, right? Cases filed separately prior to snitching btw. So there goes that excuse.
 
Last edited:
  • #474
I've been trying to find the video that aired not long after their disappearance. It was one that showed people in the police station. It had an interview with Bartt Streeter. And the one cop was really creepy when handling pictures of Suzie. Do you remember that one?
I think that's the one that starts out with the reporter standing in front of Janelle K's house, and the same one in which JK say's "That Other Girl". Isn't it? Detective Asher was the one going through the pictures, and makes a mention that some of the pictures were a little "Racy". Personally I didn't get a "Creepy Vibe" out of Det. Asher. He just seemed like a simple country guy, that raised "Sheep/Goats" (Can't remember), lived a simple life, and worked as a Detective. I did however, get a creepy vibe from the person who owned the photo business, who was sitting with Asher when he was looking at the pictures. I also found it odd, that Asher makes a point to mention that a couple o the photos were "Missing". Not that any of this has anything to do with anything.
The 48hrs video is the video I think you're referring to.
Someone may have to refresh my memory on this one though......but I think the 48hrs video was the one.
 
  • #475
The women didn't know Cary from Adam's housecat even though he did work for the motel. If the Springfield Three knew their abductor they'd likely comply with his demands never suspecting until too late that they wouldn't get out of this alive.

Sorry I wrote Cory lol. Suzie and Sherrills house looks like the three women were beamed up by aliens. The parade of people could have covered up or destroyed evidence. Sometimes complying with a burglar, rapist, potential killer keeps you alive, other times it ends with death. Once someone has broken into your house or is abducting you your survival is already up in the air.
I never understood how Cary Stayner could abduct and murder people after what his brother went through.
 
  • #476
We are hellbent I’m getting the truth out and NOT presumptions because only facts will solve this. It had NOTHING to do with Joe and only facts. Also Suzie was not sent to testify. Show me the document that shows she was since you are all show me the proof now or you are breaking the rules. The door swings both ways.
Ok, you say "It had nothing to do with Joe", like you KNOW who it DID HAVE something to do with.
Unless one of you were with Joe that night, how can you make that statement.
Do you "KNOW" that it had nothing to do with Joe, based on "OTHER INFORMATION"?
Just asking. And asking with all due respect intended.
 
  • #477
The law doesn't work that way. His vandalism trial doesn't have anything to do with 3MW as far as sentencing, etc. His lawyer would have a field day if the judge wanted to give a harsh sentence over suspected guilt in another crime.
.

Exactly, the law does not work that way so even if Suzie was questioned in that trial it could of only been about the vandalism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #478
Ok, you say "It had nothing to do with Joe", like you KNOW who it DID HAVE something to do with.
Unless one of you were with Joe that night, how can you make that statement.
Do you "KNOW" that it had nothing to do with Joe, based on "OTHER INFORMATION"?
Just asking. And asking with all due respect intended.

In that statement I was questioned by Ozark on why I was defending him. I stated my DEFENDING HIM had nothing to do with Joe and only the truth.
 
  • #479
I think that's the one that starts out with the reporter standing in front of Janelle K's house, and the same one in which JK say's "That Other Girl". Isn't it? Detective Asher was the one going through the pictures, and makes a mention that some of the pictures were a little "Racy". Personally I didn't get a "Creepy Vibe" out of Det. Asher. He just seemed like a simple country guy, that raised "Sheep/Goats" (Can't remember), lived a simple life, and worked as a Detective. I did however, get a creepy vibe from the person who owned the photo business, who was sitting with Asher when he was looking at the pictures. I also found it odd, that Asher makes a point to mention that a couple o the photos were "Missing". Not that any of this has anything to do with anything.
The 48hrs video is the video I think you're referring to.
Someone may have to refresh my memory on this one though......but I think the 48hrs video was the one.

I linked it earlier in the thread I don't know if you or anyone wants me to repost it. It's all over the place it has Stacy's family, interviews, a taped polygraph then it's got psychics, missing kids that were returned, and the sheep/goats it's like huh? I didn't like his assumptions about Suzie while staring at her pictures. Actually just voicing his opinions about her just came off as unprofessional.
 
  • #480
Exactly, the law does not work that way so even if Suzie was questioned in that trial it could of only been about the vandalism.
Again we go back to this: criminals magically know what is/isn't going to be discussed in a trial? A lot of them aren't that bright.

But also, that aside, they could ask about non-vandalism topics if it pertained to how they know certain people. Which is the entire point. I believe they were abducted to be scared into not saying things to the cops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
3,562
Total visitors
3,646

Forum statistics

Threads
632,609
Messages
18,628,962
Members
243,213
Latest member
bleuuu_
Back
Top