- Joined
- Apr 28, 2005
- Messages
- 12,378
- Reaction score
- 32,467
No, Leila, but the SA did mention she hoped it would take place later this year, with a furtive glance at JBaez.
Thanks! I had a feeling that the trial might be late 2009 or early 2010.
No, Leila, but the SA did mention she hoped it would take place later this year, with a furtive glance at JBaez.
Thanks to everyone for keeping this thread updated and to Patty G!
What happened to the other motions which were not addressed? I realize the one motion over the defense witness list was taken care of, but what happened to the others? JG's is one in particular I wanted to hear about and it sounds as if they didn't even bring it up.
This was as MN was speaking of TES searching for the remains of Caylee, saying her name, & she is behaving as a schoolgirl throwing a pen, smirking, flirting with Counsel, in the court regarding the MURDER of her daughter:furious::furious:
I'm sorry, this should be in the Rant page, but this ##### defies description, or logic of a Mother. How in God's name does she come off as soooo ABOVE it all without any emotions. This can't be new, her mother condoned & nourished this behavior. I can't help always going back to Cindy, & I hold her responsible for this disgusting display of a human being!
Caylee is in a better place compared to this Madness!:furious::furious:
JMO
Not making fun of her because I have to watch my weight
all the time but it looks like Casey as gained alot weight in her
backside anyone else see that are is it just me seeing things.
That big smile she had on her face made me sick I don't think
she even thinks about Caylee only herself and in her dumb
mind I think she thinks it's all a game and one day she will
be set free...But jail now and later prison for a lifetime .
She did it and she needs to pay for what she did.
Shades of Lady Macbeth.. "out, out, da*n spot"
Bold by me.
But I am sorry something was just not right there.
I certainily hope Baez is above such low tactics. I have seen no reason to believe he would do that, at this point and certainly wouldn't judge him without cause. Maybe he wouldn't but Florida's Sunshine Law certainly would.
How could they expect to remain anonymous if they stepped into public, and met with the search team? The minute you walk out the door you expose yourself to being involved in what ever is going on, especially what you choose to participate in. They shouldn't have any problem with helping justice along. I have never tried to remain anonymous about searching, heck I've told everyone because it was one of the most rewarding experiences of my life and I'm 67 years old and I'm all for helping justice along.
Yes, they are taking the chance that something unfair could happen. Not really!
I have no problem with the defense knowing my name and the fact I searched but they have no right to my personal information.
There are many people that have spent many years in jail unjustly. Is that what we want? Of course not but knowing my personal information is not going to keep someone out of jail!
I don't and would be willing to take my chances, in order to do my duty as a citizen and fellow human being. Again how is knowing my personal information going to keep Casey out of jail??
Yes, she is a fellow human being too.
You are so right but you know what so was CAYLEE!!!
In fact, who knows...you and I might both find our mitochondrial DNA is the same as hers, whether tracing back to Eve or Lilith. Doubt that very much!!
Don't mean to sound harse but this is personal! I think anyone who searched would come forward on their own if they searched the exact area in question but we all know that exact area was not searched because TM has stated many times it was called off due to the water and he has been backed up by many others.
GRANNYL
Love & Light
Connie
Of course not.
But, if appearances didn't matter, lawyers wouldn't need to tell their clients how to dress for court.
The defense wanted Casey to look as young and professional as possible.However despite the obvious prepping, LKB forgot to tell JB and Casey not to carry on while the cameras were rolling. I bet when LKB sees THOSE video clips she will be fuming.
I think courtroom strategy (which includes making an unsympathetic defendant more appealling) is interesting.
JMO
Did anyone else notice that KC seemed to be trying so hard NOT to smile, like this is so amusing to her. It makes me sick! :furious::sick:
I'm not at all sure this is an accurate statement. They organised the search in co-operation with OSCO. ie, they used the information that LE had collected. That is not the same as taking orders.
That's what I thought... it just such a manipulative statement... ie. just pretend to be interested. All for show.
Everyone keeps reference a playful interaction btw JB & KC... can someone tell me at what time in the video it occurs? I missed it.
thanks
And this type of behavior may be the reason JB was trying to keep her from attending the hearings. MNJ is speaking about "searching for remains of Caylee"..."the remains of a child"......"the remains of a child (again)".......and Casey playfully tosses her pen onto the paperwork in front of JB and SMILES!!!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk4GS4rTUZk
at the 44 seconds mark, give or take. While Mark Nejame is addressing the court about the TES searches.
Another question (I'm sorry I'm obviously law-challenged) why do some lawyers address the judge as "Your Honor", and JB sometimes says "Judge" and other times "Your Honor"?
"Judge" doesn't sound as respectful somehow. Is that OK, etiquette-wise?
Question about the logistics of seating in the hearing....
Is there a protocol in the hearing proceedings, of who sits where, other that the obvious- Prosecution on one side, defense on the other. It seemed MN, BC were on the side behind the Prosecution. Does that have some significance?
Casey took useless notes to appear as if she is smart. Heh. The suit thing was probably an "in your face, court" statement.
Question about the logistics of seating in the hearing....
Is there a protocol in the hearing proceedings, of who sits where, other that the obvious- Prosecution on one side, defense on the other. It seemed MN, BC were on the side behind the Prosecution. Does that have some significance?