MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/11/11

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holy Cannoli. That's some messed up stuff right there. Hmmm...wonder who besides DB would want to know what is on her voicemail?

One thing I've been keeping in mind, if the phones were even taken, is that the phones could have been taken because someone wanted to know what they were up to or who they were talking to. Read email, check voicemail, see what they are saying. this would obviously only in a case where emotions are involved- someone scorned or personally upset. I have never been convinced it was at all about not being able to call 911. I just know that if someone wanted to know what I was up to, my phone would be the absolute best things to look at.
 
BBM: Exactly ... :waitasec: and WHY... IF you just kidnapped a baby, would you need to use the internet ?

Makes no sense at all ...

MOO ...

.....or be interested in Deb's voicemail and KNOW her password to get into it?
 
Ok back to the cell phones...

Restricted has always meant (with all 4 carriers I've been with)...

No internet access (I'm not even sure how they could log someone attempting to access the internet, because mine had NO internet signal when I had restricted service).

No outgoing calls. They would always go straight to customer service or an automated system to pay by phone.

However, I could usually receive incoming calls. I could not access my voicemail though. And I could not send/receive texts.

This would last anywhere from 2-3 days before I had no service at all.

And if anybody missed it, I've been a customer of Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, and now T-Mobile, and each one has operated exactly like this. HTH.
 
the call went TO MW not from - and if as you say she used MW's phone I would figured because hers weren't working...why would she try to access voice mail??

What I meant was, DB tried to reach someone dialing MW's phone. I'll go back and clarify.
 
That's GREAT news! That will move this thing forward, for sure, I believe.


ppffftttt....DB and JI have known all along they could have their attorney, they don't want separate interviews.
 
peeps... this is the msm thread... I am also a culprit of general discussion.. but can we please put our thoughts and discussion in the appropriate places and leave this open for msm? thanks so much.
 
Lying purposely, leading LE on the wrong road.........how about this--

DB told interviewers on GMA she may have blacked out.
A lie or the truth?
Going to sleep and blacking out are 2 entirely different things.
The truth was possibly DB drank too much and fell asleep.

DB said she put the baby to bed at 6:30-or was it 10:30 --oops she changed the story.
One is correct the other is a lie.

Another probable lie.......... I reprogramed the phones.

Another.....the phones were stolen by the 'kidnapper'.
lastly,
The baby was kidnapped. IMOO biggest lie yet. IMO
 
Let me clarify by internet signal, I mean 3g/4g through the cell company itself. I have not attempted to use my T-Mobile phone with my wi-fi at the house because if it goes restricted, I pay the bill the same day.
 
Well, we have another "but" because BS said they could...........let me get the link. He said they were "red-lined" and could only receive calls.......... This is from today also..........

http://video.foxnews.com/v/12707393...s-released-of-irwin-family/?playlist_id=87937
Thanks. Not arguing with YOU but I think we can say BS is full of BS with a lot he says. I wonder if he really even knows or is speculating like we have caught him in previous interviews. I would rather even hear from JT than him - NOT that I want to hear from JT though. I do believe the other local attorney that the phones were restricted though as he stated the FBI showed him the records and that could easily be disproved.
 
What if DB didn't realize the phone bill was behind or she knew they were late,but didn't realize they had been restricted until she tried to make the calls that night,then tried to get her VM ,to see if that worked.
If I suddenly couldn't make a call out I would try other phone features to see what was wrong.
 
cell phone thread: [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153145"]Missing Cell Phones #2 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

:nurse:
 
You know what I want to see? Her phone records for the 2 days before it. I would want to see if there was nothing, nada, zilch on them leading up to this night bc of restriction- or if they had been in use. And I'd like to know if the phones were, in fact, restricted.
 
When I tried to dial long distance on her phone, the message I received used the words "restricted service". She also has Verizon. Does this fit into this discussion? I don't know.

I don't think Jeremy, Deb, and their lawyers can be relied upon for truthfulness related to their phones....and other things.



From the parents interview at the time Lisa went missing they stated the cell phones were taken and were NOT working/restricted. If one of these phones has evidence of attempted calls vm and internet access it doesnt make sense. Either DB made these calls so therefore the phones were not restricted OR an abductor attempted to use the restricted phone.

My question on the latter is why would an abductor be so stupid as to attempt to use a stolen phone after abducting a baby.

None of facts or speculation in this case mae any sense and I am still as baffled as I was three weeks ago :banghead:
 
Missing Baby Lisa Irwin: Police and Parents Spar on Tot's Birthday


When asked if he thought police consider parents Deborah Bradley, 25, and Jeremy Irwin, 29, suspects, criminal defense attorney John Picerno replied, "Absolutely. They've told them as much, Debbie in particular."

Picerno said he was "not at liberty" to elaborate further on the issue.

The Kansas City Police Department denies the claim that Bradley and Irwin are suspects.

"We don't have any suspects," Police Capt. Steve Young told ABCNews.com today. "We still would like to speak to them again."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-ba...attorneys-claim/story?id=14931954#.Tr2h_0NTl9


:banghead::banghead: :floorlaugh::floorlaugh: :seeya:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
619
Total visitors
792

Forum statistics

Threads
626,030
Messages
18,515,966
Members
240,896
Latest member
jehunter
Back
Top